Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia's "rose revolution" fails to put down roots

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenia's "rose revolution" fails to put down roots

    Agence France Presse
    April 21, 2004 Wednesday 8:06 AM Eastern Time

    Armenia's "rose revolution" fails to put down roots

    by MARIAM HARUTUNIAN

    YEREVAN


    As opposition supporters in Armenia's capital prepared late last week
    for a rally calling for the resignation of President Robert
    Kocharian, staff in a computer salesroom on the city's Abovian Street
    were too busy smoking cigarettes to pay much attention.

    They said they had no intention of joining the protests. "They'll
    just get hit on the head by police and go home," said Samvel, the
    store manager, while he watched an opposition leader on the
    television set in his office. "So what?"

    This indifference from Armenia's middle classes is one of the
    reasons, analysts say, why Armenia is highly unlikely to emulate the
    "rose revolution" in its neighbour Georgia which swept that country's
    unpopular rulers from power last year.

    On the face of it, Armenia, a former Soviet republic of three million
    people in the Caucasus mountains, has all the makings of a
    Georgian-style revolution.

    Like in Georgia, Armenia's economy is still reeling from the collapse
    of the Soviet Union. According to World Bank figures, 49 percent of
    the population lives below the poverty line.

    Like its neighbour, Armenia has a massive gulf between the rich and
    poor -- something many people blame on official corruption.

    And as in Georgia, the government stands accused of rigging elections
    to preserve its power. A presidential election last year which gave
    Kocharian a second term in office was flawed, according to
    international observers.

    When a coalition of opposition parties began a campaign of mass
    demonstrations this month, comparisons were quickly drawn with
    Georgia's revolution.

    Some protesters even carried chrysanthemums, mimicking their Georgian
    counterparts who demonstrated with rose stems in their hands.

    Yet Armenia's opposition campaign has failed to capture the popular
    imagination. At the latest rally in the capital, Yerevan, last
    Friday, the core of opposition support -- mostly low-income,
    middle-aged people with a preponderance of women -- was out in force.

    But the students and well-heeled members of the middle class who gave
    Georgia's revolution its unstoppable momentum stayed at home.

    "I do not think that all these demonstrations can lead to a change in
    power," said analyst Gevorg Pogossian. "A large part of the
    population ... is continuing to behave like distant observers and not
    active participants."

    Analysts point to several factors. The first is that unlike his
    ousted Georgian counterpart, 50-year-old Kocharian has a tight grip
    on the state machinery.

    This means that though pensions and state sector wages are miserly,
    they are at least paid on time. It also gives Kocharian the
    confidence to use the police against protesters, as he did earlier
    this month when water cannon and truncheons were used to disperse an
    opposition rally.

    Another factor, say analysts, is that Armenia's opposition lacks a
    charismatic figure like Georgia's Mikhail Saakashvili, who led that
    country's protests and went on to become president.

    "Our opposition is very weak and not very convincing," said Rolan
    Minassian, a 59-year-old scientist.

    The opposition does not have the advantage its Georgian counterparts
    had of regular access to the television airwaves. All of Armenia's
    television stations are loyal to the president.

    Finally, though many Armenians grumble about low living standards
    they blame not Kocharian, but a crippling economic blockade imposed
    on the country by two of its neighbours, Turkey and Azerbaijan.

    The blockade is linked to a row about pogroms against ethnic
    Armenians in Ottoman Turkey at the start of the last century, and a
    still-unresolved war with Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of
    Nagorno-Karabakh.

    For now at least, most ordinary people are fully behind Kocharian in
    opposing any concessions which could see the blockade lifted.

    "After upheavals like these, the collapse of the Soviet Union, the
    Karabakh war, the blockade, no president could have put the country
    and the people back on its feet," said Sergei Arutyunian, a
    74-year-old pensioner.
Working...
X