Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In the Shadow of Moscow: Armenia Rebuilt by its Diaspora

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • In the Shadow of Moscow: Armenia Rebuilt by its Diaspora

    In the Shadow of Moscow

    Armenia Rebuilt by its Diaspora

    Le Monde diplomatique
    January 2004

    By Vicken Cheterian

    If you had been in Yerevan, the Armenian capital, last summer, you
    wouldn't have been able to visit any museums, since they were shut for
    restoration; city streets and pavements were closed while being
    rebuilt. Thanks to a generous donation from the US-Armenian
    billionaire, Kirk Kerkorian, the city has been given a new look. Since
    2001 Ker kor ian, owner of MGM studios in Hollywood and hotels in Las
    Vegas, has allocated $170m for roads and housing in this vulnerable
    earthquake region. Money has been lent to small businesses and to
    provide employment for 20,000 people. The sum is a third of the annual
    national budget.

    Gerard Cafesjian, another US-Armenian, is spending $25m to renovate
    the Cascade, a complex of stairways and workshops linking central
    Yerevan with the Monument district, where he plans to build a modern
    art museum (1). The diaspora is starting to return to Armenia, and its
    activities make a difference. The population of Armenia is 3.8 million
    but there are twice that many in the diaspora, with major
    concentrations in Russia, the US, Georgia, France, Iran and
    Lebanon. After the earthquake of 1988, which killed more than 25,000
    and destroyed a third of the industrial potential, the diaspora sent
    immediate massive aid. In the past two years investments have replaced
    aid, supporting economic activities from software companies to hi-tech
    medicine.

    Politically, relations between Armenia and its diaspora are
    complex. Traditional political parties from the diaspora have
    influence in the country, for example the Armenian Revolutionary
    Federation (Tashnaktsoutyun) and the Liberal Democratic party
    (Ramgavars), which have branches and media. But there are major
    divergences and misunderstandings.

    In 1988, at the beginning of the popular movement in Armenia, the
    diaspora parties called for calm, in tacit support for the Soviet
    authorities. With their traditional fear of their Turkish neighbour,
    the Armenian parties thought that the weakening of the Soviet
    (Russian) power in Armenia would expose the country to a Turkish
    threat.

    After the Soviet collapse, Armenians from Marseille, Cairo or Boston
    came to Armenia and suffered from culture shock. They wanted to invest
    but did not understand the subtleties of Soviet bureaucracy, the new
    rules of a wild market economy, or the corruption or rela tivity of
    the laws. Many lost their investments within months. The
    disappointment was so great that some started talking of taking refuge
    elsewhere. To make matters worse, the first president, Levon
    Ter-Petrossian, did not appreciate the presence of organised diaspora
    organisations in Armenia. In December 1994 a number of Tashnak
    activists were arrested, their media closed and party activities
    abolished. With Robert Kocharian's accession in 1999, relations
    improved: the activists were released and the Tashnaktsoutyun became a
    junior partner in the government. It now has three ministers.

    To change things, the Armenian state organised two major conferences
    in 1999 and 2002, inviting the diaspora to invest. The current foreign
    minister, Vartan Oskanian, born in Syria and US-educated, played a key
    role in both (2). A number of organisations actively lobby for the
    Armenian cause, increasing the importance of this tiny nation
    internationally. The Armenian Assembly of America and the Armenian
    National Committee of America, two powerful lobby groups in
    Washington, are struggling for the recognition of the genocide of 1915
    and for a favourable US policy towards Armenia.

    Recently Aram Abrahamian, an Armenian-Russian oligarch, launched the
    World Organisation of Armenians with the direct blessing of President
    Vladimir Putin of Russia. In Yerevan they fear this is another
    manoeuvre by the Kremlin to increase its influence, not just on
    Armenia, but on worldwide Armenian communities. Other analysts think
    that, in this period of Duma elections, Putin is interested in winning
    the favours of 2.5 million Russian citizens of Armenian origin (3).

    The enormous effort by the diaspora to support Armenia has taken funds
    away from its community organisation just as its identity was starting
    to change under pressure from new migration trends and in a decade of
    globalisation. This has weakened traditional Armenian community
    structures, such as the parties, church and schools (4). Though the
    overall influence of the diaspora is increasing in Armenia, its impact
    on political, social and economic decision-making remains limited.


    Vicken Cheterian is a journalist in Yerevan.

    NOTES

    (1) See www.cmf.am

    (2) The Armenian foreign ministry and its policy were influenced by
    the diaspora. The first foreign minister was US-Armenian Raffi
    Hovannesian, son of the famous historian Richard Hovannesian. After
    his resignation in 1992, foreign policy was mainly the domain of the
    presidential adviser, political scientist Gerard Libaridian, born in
    Lebanon and later a US resident.

    (3) See Sophie Lambroschini, "Russia: Putin Plays To Armenian
    Diaspora, But For What Purpose?" RFE/RL, Prague, 13 October 2003.

    (4) There are 390 Armenian schools outside Armenia, according to
    ArmenPress, Yerevan, 20 November 2003.

    http://mondediplo.com/2004/01/07armeniabox?var_recherche=Armenian
Working...
X