Tweet
The Washington Post
July 16, 2004 Friday
Final Edition
House Votes Down Cut In Military Aid to Egypt;
Administration Officials Pressed Hill on Issue
Dan Morgan, Washington Post Staff Writer
The House yesterday rejected a $570 million cut in U.S. military aid
to Egypt after Secretary of State Colin L. Powell issued a
last-minute warning to lawmakers that the action would damage
relations with a close Middle East ally "at a very sensitive moment
in the region."
Although the 287 to 131 vote was lopsided, the administration and
military contractors who sell U.S.-financed weaponry to Egypt took
seriously the threat of a cut and worked behind the scenes to head it
off.
Before the vote, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice made
calls to some lawmakers, who were also on notice from arms companies
that the shift could result in job losses in home districts. "It was
a full-court press," said Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), who offered the
amendment to the $19.4 billion foreign aid bill for 2005.
His bill would have shifted the military aid to economic assistance,
which he said is "desperately needed" in Egypt. "The last thing this
society [Egypt] needs is the ultimate in high-tech weaponry," Lantos
said.
The debate brought out highly ambivalent feelings about Egypt. The
House's pro-Israel forces used the opportunity to vent frustration
with the Egyptian government's role during hostilities between Israel
and the Palestinians. Among those supporting the cut was House
Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), one of the strongest supporters
of Israeli interests in Congress.
Lawmakers took the floor to rebuke the Egyptian government for
tolerating anti-Semitism, limiting its cooperation with the United
States in the war on terrorism and failing to prevent gun-smuggling
to militant Palestinian groups.
But Powell and senior lawmakers in both parties warned that the
action would send the wrong signal at a time when Egypt has begun
working closely with Israel to assure a smooth transition as Israel
plans to withdraw from Gaza.
In a letter to Congress, Powell noted that a unilateral reduction
would weaken the balanced military aid to Egypt and Israel that is a
"cornerstone" of the 1979 Camp David peace accords. In 2005, Israel
and Egypt are set to receive $2.2 billion and $1.3 billion in grants,
respectively, under the formula.
"Our credibility in this relationship depends to a great degree upon
being a reliable provider of assistance to the Egyptian military,"
Powell wrote.
"This puts a finger in the eye of our friends in Egypt," said Rep.
John D. Dingell (D-Mich.)
Jewish House members were divided on the issue. Rep. Nita M. Lowey
(D-N.Y.) questioned why the United States was providing lavish
military assistance to Egypt even though "it has no real enemies" and
its government tolerates "TV shows that perpetuate anti-Semitism."
But she said she was reluctantly opposing the aid cut because of its
timing, noting that Egypt has lately signaled its intention to play a
more constructive Middle East role.
However, Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), in backing Lantos's proposal,
said years of U.S. aid to Egypt have done little to curb anti-Israel
rhetoric in the country's media.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the principal
pro-Israel lobby in the United States, took no official position on
the issue. Earlier in the day, AIPAC won at least a symbolic victory
when it helped push through the House a resolution that was critical
of a July 9 advisory judgment from the International Court of Justice
holding Israel's security wall to be illegal. The resolution
indicated that the ruling was a result of improper political pressure
from members of the U.N. General Assembly. The vote was 361 to 45.
Later yesterday, Republican leaders helped the underlying foreign aid
bill get passed by a 365 to 41 vote. Tight budget restrictions forced
the House to cut $2 billion from President Bush's request, but the
measure still provides a record $2.2 billion to fight HIV/AIDS,
malaria and tuberculosis -- nearly $60 million more than last year.
The president got only half the $2.5 billion he requested for his
signature foreign aid initiative, the Millennium Challenge
Corporation. The corporation establishes a new way to dispense
foreign aid to countries that qualify by meeting a list of criteria
such as commitment to free-market economies and democratic
institutions.
The bill provides $900 million in aid to Afghanistan, and continues a
waiver that allows continued bilateral economic assistance to
Azerbaijan despite that country's economic blockage of Armenia.
July 16, 2004 Friday
Final Edition
House Votes Down Cut In Military Aid to Egypt;
Administration Officials Pressed Hill on Issue
Dan Morgan, Washington Post Staff Writer
The House yesterday rejected a $570 million cut in U.S. military aid
to Egypt after Secretary of State Colin L. Powell issued a
last-minute warning to lawmakers that the action would damage
relations with a close Middle East ally "at a very sensitive moment
in the region."
Although the 287 to 131 vote was lopsided, the administration and
military contractors who sell U.S.-financed weaponry to Egypt took
seriously the threat of a cut and worked behind the scenes to head it
off.
Before the vote, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice made
calls to some lawmakers, who were also on notice from arms companies
that the shift could result in job losses in home districts. "It was
a full-court press," said Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), who offered the
amendment to the $19.4 billion foreign aid bill for 2005.
His bill would have shifted the military aid to economic assistance,
which he said is "desperately needed" in Egypt. "The last thing this
society [Egypt] needs is the ultimate in high-tech weaponry," Lantos
said.
The debate brought out highly ambivalent feelings about Egypt. The
House's pro-Israel forces used the opportunity to vent frustration
with the Egyptian government's role during hostilities between Israel
and the Palestinians. Among those supporting the cut was House
Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), one of the strongest supporters
of Israeli interests in Congress.
Lawmakers took the floor to rebuke the Egyptian government for
tolerating anti-Semitism, limiting its cooperation with the United
States in the war on terrorism and failing to prevent gun-smuggling
to militant Palestinian groups.
But Powell and senior lawmakers in both parties warned that the
action would send the wrong signal at a time when Egypt has begun
working closely with Israel to assure a smooth transition as Israel
plans to withdraw from Gaza.
In a letter to Congress, Powell noted that a unilateral reduction
would weaken the balanced military aid to Egypt and Israel that is a
"cornerstone" of the 1979 Camp David peace accords. In 2005, Israel
and Egypt are set to receive $2.2 billion and $1.3 billion in grants,
respectively, under the formula.
"Our credibility in this relationship depends to a great degree upon
being a reliable provider of assistance to the Egyptian military,"
Powell wrote.
"This puts a finger in the eye of our friends in Egypt," said Rep.
John D. Dingell (D-Mich.)
Jewish House members were divided on the issue. Rep. Nita M. Lowey
(D-N.Y.) questioned why the United States was providing lavish
military assistance to Egypt even though "it has no real enemies" and
its government tolerates "TV shows that perpetuate anti-Semitism."
But she said she was reluctantly opposing the aid cut because of its
timing, noting that Egypt has lately signaled its intention to play a
more constructive Middle East role.
However, Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), in backing Lantos's proposal,
said years of U.S. aid to Egypt have done little to curb anti-Israel
rhetoric in the country's media.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the principal
pro-Israel lobby in the United States, took no official position on
the issue. Earlier in the day, AIPAC won at least a symbolic victory
when it helped push through the House a resolution that was critical
of a July 9 advisory judgment from the International Court of Justice
holding Israel's security wall to be illegal. The resolution
indicated that the ruling was a result of improper political pressure
from members of the U.N. General Assembly. The vote was 361 to 45.
Later yesterday, Republican leaders helped the underlying foreign aid
bill get passed by a 365 to 41 vote. Tight budget restrictions forced
the House to cut $2 billion from President Bush's request, but the
measure still provides a record $2.2 billion to fight HIV/AIDS,
malaria and tuberculosis -- nearly $60 million more than last year.
The president got only half the $2.5 billion he requested for his
signature foreign aid initiative, the Millennium Challenge
Corporation. The corporation establishes a new way to dispense
foreign aid to countries that qualify by meeting a list of criteria
such as commitment to free-market economies and democratic
institutions.
The bill provides $900 million in aid to Afghanistan, and continues a
waiver that allows continued bilateral economic assistance to
Azerbaijan despite that country's economic blockage of Armenia.