Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Envoy Vague On Reported U.S. Push For Karabakh Peace

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Envoy Vague On Reported U.S. Push For Karabakh Peace

    Envoy Vague On Reported U.S. Push For Karabakh Peace
    By Hrach Melkumian and Karine Kalantarian 18/06/2004 11:14

    Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic
    June 18 2004

    U.S. Ambassador John Ordway stopped short Thursday of explicitly
    confirming or refuting reports that the United States is pushing for
    a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict that would require an
    Armenian pullout from occupied Azerbaijani lands before agreement on
    the disputed region's status.

    Armenian opposition leaders and some media have claimed over the past
    week that Washington has suggested that Azerbaijan lift its economic
    blockade of Armenia in exchange for getting back three of its seven
    districts surrounding Karabakh which were occupied by Armenian forces
    during the 1991-94 war. They said the plan was put forward by Steven
    Mann, the U.S. co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, during a visit to
    Yerevan late last month.

    The speculation was heightened by Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian's
    talks in Washington this week with U.S. Secretary of State Colin
    Powell and President George W. Bush's top national security adviser,
    Condoleeza Rice. The U.S. State Department said Karabakh topped the
    agenda of the talks.

    Asked by RFE/RL to comment on the claims, Ordway said: "The [U.S.,
    French and Russian] co-chairs have not made any specific proposals in
    this most recent round of discussions and negotiations. Normally it's
    not my role or responsibility to comment on the work of the co-chairs.
    So I think that's the best answer I can provide to you and still
    not start going into the details of the negotiations, which is not
    appropriate for me to do."

    "But if [my interpreter] has done his job and you look at it very
    carefully, I think you will find the answer to your question," he
    added without elaborating.

    Azerbaijani officials had said earlier that the conflicting parties and
    the international mediators are discussing the possibility of reverting
    to the so-called "step-by-step" strategy of conflict resolution,
    preferred by Baku. Armenian officials have not explicitly denied this,
    while making it clear that they still stand for a "package" peace
    accord on all contentious issues, including Karabakh's status. Oskanian
    and his Azerbaijani counterpart, Elmar Mamedyarov, are scheduled to
    meet in Prague on June 21 for the third time this year.

    Ordway said it is up to the conflicting parties to choose between
    the package and phased formulas. "Either variant would be fine with
    us if it produced a settlement," he said.

    The Prague talks will take place against the backdrop of an escalation
    of tension on the westernmost section of the heavily militarized border
    between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Armenian military has reported
    that one of its officers was shot dead in a clash with Azerbaijani
    forces last week. Azerbaijan's Defense Ministry admitted on Wednesday
    that its troops also sustained casualties.

    "But the enemy suffered more," the ministry spokesman, Ramiz Melikov,
    told RFE/RL. "We don't want to talk about numbers. They are not
    important." Melikov denied Armenian claims that the Azerbaijani army
    violated the regime of ceasefire in the area by occupying a hill
    in a no-man's land overlooking a major water reservoir in Armenia's
    northeastern Tavush region.

    But Colonel-General Mikael Harutiunian, chief of the Armenian army
    staff, insisted on Yerevan's version of events according to which
    Armenian units had to dig in closer to the Azerbaijani positions to
    forestall any damage to a facility which pumps irrigation water to
    nearby villages. Harutiunian was due to visit Tavush later on Thursday.

    Ordway described the fighting as "very worrisome" and urged both
    sides to exercise "restraint."
Working...
X