Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AAA: Sen. Mcconnell Urges Strenghtening US-Armenia Ties

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AAA: Sen. Mcconnell Urges Strenghtening US-Armenia Ties

    Armenian Assembly of America
    122 C Street, NW, Suite 350
    Washington, DC 20001
    Phone: 202-393-3434
    Fax: 202-638-4904
    Email: [email protected]
    Web: www.armenianassembly.org

    PRESS RELEASE
    May 7, 2004
    CONTACT: Christine Kojoian
    E-mail: [email protected]

    SENATOR McCONNELL URGES STRENGTHENING U.S.-ARMENIA RELATIONS
    DURING NATIONAL PAN-ARMENIAN CONFERENCE

    Washington, DC - Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell (R-KY), as the
    featured luncheon speaker at a major non-partisan, pan-Armenian conference
    April 19, pledged to work towards increasing Armenia's funding level above
    the Bush Administration request of $62 million for FY 2005. McConnell, a
    well-known advocate of Armenian issues, also said he supports current
    legislation granting permanent normal trade relations to Armenia.

    The Conference, a three-day advocacy push led by the community's major
    non-partisan organizations - the Armenian Assembly of America, the Armenian
    General Benevolent Union (AGBU) and the Eastern and Western Diocese of the
    Armenian Church, brought hundreds of activists to the nation's capital for
    this first-ever gathering.

    McConnell, who holds the second most powerful position in the United States
    Senate, was introduced by Armenian Assembly Board of Directors Chairman
    Anthony Barsamian, who hailed the Senator as, "an extraordinary friend of
    our community."

    Below is the full text of Senator McConnell's speech:

    "Well, thank you very much. It's great to see all of you again. I see some
    old friends that I've been involved in a few wars with. Hirair Hovnanian,
    thank you for being here. I'm proud of the work that you do on the East
    coast and of course one of my best friends and buddies - the guy you just
    described as being in charge of me - Albert Boyajian and his wife Tove. I
    had the opportunity to go to Armenia with them a few years ago. If you are
    not Armenian, there is nothing like going to Armenia with somebody who is
    Armenian because it really adds a lot to the experience while you're there
    and Albert I thank you for teaching me about Armenia and for being my friend
    and always being there when I need you. I think he does an extraordinary job
    of making sure all of us who are not of Armenian decent understand the
    history of Armenia and the importance of the U.S./Armenia relationship which
    is, of course, what I'd like to talk about today."

    "I visited Nagorno Karabakh. I've been to Azerbaijan as well and I've had a
    chance to spend some time with President Kocharian and others, none of which
    I would argue makes me an expert but I suppose I know a little bit more
    about Armenia than most Americans. I must say that I think it has enormous
    potential in large measure because of the Armenian-American community and I
    want to thank all you for what you're doing for the place from which you all
    came at one point or another. Without you, the story of Armenia simply
    would not be told in America."

    "I also want to encourage you to lobby Armenia to continue to move in the
    direction of a closer relationship with the United States. It's no secret
    when I tell you that the Azeris work very hard to cultivate a good
    relationship with the United States. They have been very cooperative in the
    war on terror and as you all know, since 9/11, a lot of U.S. foreign policy
    tends to be viewed through the prism of how committed are you to the war on
    terror and how much are you helping us on the war on terror and I know we
    have representatives from the Armenian government today and I want to
    encourage you to be - to work with us as closely as you possibly can in the
    war on terror because I think it is pretty apparent after 9/11 and the other
    attacks that have occurred around the world. This is not just something that
    happened to the United States - that this is the central challenge of the
    21st century. This level of radicalism is a threat to the civilized world
    and we simply must stand up to it."

    "Now there are sort of two schools of thought here in the United States.
    There are some that think this is kind of a law enforcement problem. You
    know, maybe what you ought to do is try to arrest somebody and maybe give
    them Johnny Cochran's card so they'll be properly represented. There are
    others who view it as clearly a wartime issue. So let's go back to 9/11. I
    am a little bit exasperated with the 9/11 commission because they're
    spending an awful lot of time, it seems to me, formerly prominent politicos
    enjoying being interviewed and telling us what we already know which is that
    Al-Qaeda did it. We know that. We knew it on the day of the attack. These
    absurd suggestions by the media and the press that the president should
    apologize - I don't recall FDR being asked to apologize for Pearl Harbor.
    What does the president need to apologize for? There's no question that
    during the eight years of the Clinton Administration and the 200 and some
    odd days of the Bush Administration, we were not on a war footing with
    Al-Qaeda. Monday morning quarterbacks always call the best plays and
    hindsight is always 20-20. I think we can all agree that if we'd been on a
    war footing against the terrorists before 9/11, we might have had a chance
    of preventing it. Although, Richard Clarke, the president's most persistent
    critic, when asked the question - if President Bush had done everything you
    asked him to when he was sworn in, would the attack have been prevented? -
    he said no. He said no."

    "So I think more important is where do we go from here? The president
    believed that it was an act of war, not a law enforcement matter, although
    law enforcement is certainly a part of conducting the war on terror. And the
    president felt we needed to get on offense. Since many of you are basketball
    fans - I know that Albert [Boyajian] tries never to miss a Lakers home game
    if he can avoid doing that - let me offer another analogy. In order to have
    a good team, you've got to have an offense and a defense. But I think we can
    all stipulate that it's easier to score on offense. We have been working to
    improve our defense. We passed the Patriot Act which broke down the barriers
    between the FBI and the CIA so they could communicate with each other, made
    it possible for us to update such things as the inability to get a warrant
    to tap a cell phone. That's how old the laws were. That's been fixed. We
    created the Department of Homeland Security which is all about defense,
    having a better defense here at home in trying to protect us from attacks.
    It's easier to score on offense and so the president called out the military
    and we went into Afghanistan and we liberated Afghanistan - something the
    British had a hard time with and something the Soviets had an extremely hard
    time with. Your military here in the United States did a superb job.
    Afghanistan has a new constitution, it's going to have elections next
    summer, little girls are back in school after 6 years of being denied the
    opportunity to be educated and Afghanistan has a chance of realizing its
    aspirations to be a normal, civilized country."

    "And then next on the list, if you want to drain the swamp of the
    terrorists, you couldn't ignore Iraq - a country that had used weapons of
    mass destruction twice, that had started two wars, one with the Iranians and
    one with the Kuwaitis - a war we had to end by liberating Kuwait led by a
    man who tried to assassinate former President Bush and in general was
    looking for a way to do us harm again. Some of the critics are now saying
    you acted too soon. Scratch your head a minute and think about 9/11.
    President Bush is being criticized for acting too late on 9/11 and being
    criticized for acting too soon on Iraq. When is the best time to deal with a
    terrorist state, before or after they attack you? I rest my case. It's
    before. And so we knew the problem with Iraq was coming and the president
    concluded it's better to deal with it beforehand rather than afterwards and
    the same people who are criticizing him for going too soon in Iraq, believe
    me, would have been criticizing him for going too late in Iraq had he waited
    until after something happened. I was in Iraq in October and Afghanistan in
    October and my wife who is a member of the president's cabinet, was in Iraq
    in February and I can tell you that a lot more is going right there than you
    think. Unfortunately they teach them in journalism school that only bad
    news is news. This reminds me of the story of President Bush out fishing
    with the Pope. A strong wind came along and blew the Pope's hat off and
    President Bush stepped out of the boat, walked across the water, picked up
    the Pope's hat, brought it back to him and the Pope put it back on his head.
    And the next day the headline in the New York Times was "Bush can't swim."
    You get my drift. The interest of the media in Iraq is only writing bad
    things and certainly we do have a security problem."

    "There is no denying that and there are some remnants of the old Bathist
    regime that certainly don't want to go easily and it's a challenging
    situation. On the other hand, when I was there in October, some six months
    ago, we'd already rebuilt 1500 schools - we've done many more than that now.
    The head of the 101st division, airborne division, the famous 101st
    airborne, which happens to be headquartered in my state, they were up in the
    northern part of the country, did a marvelous job and they've already had
    local elections up there. They've now come home but their leader, General
    Petraeus, is going back to head up the development of the Iraqi military.
    The reason I'm spending a good deal of time on the war on terror is because
    it seems to me that the key to the U.S./Armenia relationship is cooperation
    on the war on terror and I want to encourage again, those of you who are
    activists on behalf of Armenia and who go there frequently and the Armenian
    government representatives who are here today, look for ways to help us win
    this battle because Armenia will not be exempt. No civilized country will be
    exempt in the future from this kind of outrageous effort to try to move us
    back to the middle ages. And I think particularly, I say to you women in
    the audience, if the terrorists had their way, you would have no rights at
    all - none. You would not be seen and you would not be heard. They really
    want to go back to the middle ages. This kind of fanaticism needs to be
    stood up to. It's the only way to deal with it and I hope that Armenia will
    move in that direction.

    As was indicated, I tried to make sure Armenia had adequate foreign
    assistance from the United States. The request in the present budget this
    year was $62 million. I'll be trying to increase that amount. Armenia
    received $75 million last year and that is considerably more than
    Azerbaijan, an imbalance that I don't apologize for, and we will try to
    achieve such an imbalance again this year. (applause) But let me reiterate
    that I think it really is the key to the U.S./Armenia relationship -really
    is cooperation in the war on terror.

    With regard to permanent trade status for Armenia, let me just say that
    right now, with all of this talk about out sourcing going on in the United
    States - we can discuss whether that's a real or an imaginary issue - free
    trade agreements are not moving much this year because of the political
    environment. Having said that, I'm not running away from free trade
    positions. I think free trade agreements are good, both for the United
    States and for the country entering into it with us and I hope that we'll be
    able to move this legislation although I must say I don't think we'll be
    able to move it this calendar year but I hope we'll be able to move this
    legislation in the near future."

    "Finally, let me just say in conclusion how much I thank all of you for what
    you're doing for this country. America is a country of immigrants. As some
    of you know, my wife came to this country as many of you did. She came at
    age eight, didn't speak a word of English and there are all kinds of
    interesting stories about her early life in Queens, New York in a little
    apartment with her sisters and her parents. One of my favorite ones is when
    there was a knock on the door one night and they opened the door and there
    are these sort of medium sized to small people dressed up in these costumes
    with bags. They thought they were being robbed and they were so frightened,
    they gave all the food in the refrigerator to them in order to get them to
    go away. So I've heard scores of these coming to America stories from my
    Chinese-American in-laws but of course many of you have had similar
    experiences coming here. Immigration renews and invigorates America and as I
    go around the country in the course of my work, it seems to me, and this is
    just anecdotal, I can't prove it by any survey or anything - anecdotally,
    that the people that got here the most recent seem to be the most gung-ho,
    you know the most excited about the opportunities in America. I think other
    countries look at us - and many of them don't like us because it's purely a
    case of envy - we've done very well but there are people in America from
    almost every country in the world who've come here and realized the American
    dream."

    "Now why is that? Why is that? It's because of the system. The system. And
    it is constantly renewed and reinvigorated by people who come here from
    abroad and who haven't gotten accustomed to it like many of us who've been
    here many generations have - haven't gotten accustomed to it, really
    appreciate it and enthusiastically and vigorously pursue the American dream
    and then the pattern is, as these new arrivals of second generation folks do
    better and better here in America, they want to help the country that they
    came from or that their ancestors came from and I find that exciting. I
    know that many of you have spent a good deal of time every single day trying
    to do something, not only for America but for Armenia because you love it
    and you want it to realize its dreams and you want it to become a country
    like America. I assure you, with your energetic participation, some day,
    that's going to happen and some day they are going to be everything you hope
    they will be and you'll be the reason for it. Those of you who've gone back
    there, who've invested there, who've employed people there, who've done so
    much, will have a lot to be proud of in the coming years. So thank you for
    what you're doing, not only for America, but for Armenia. It's a privilege
    to be with you today and I look forward to seeing you again soon."

    Thank you.

    The Armenian Assembly of America is the largest Washington-based nationwide
    organization promoting public understanding and awareness of Armenian
    issues. It is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt membership organization.

    NR#2004-042
Working...
X