Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Peter Principles: Prisoner's base

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Peter Principles: Prisoner's base

    United Press International
    May 7, 2004 Friday

    The Peter Principles: Prisoner's base

    By PETER ROFF

    WASHINGTON, May 7 (UPI)


    The Bush administration's public standing appears badly damaged by
    the unfolding scandal that was kicked off by the discovery of
    photographs seeming to show U.S. military personnel mistreating
    inmates at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison.

    Since the revelations, Bush's approval rating in the Gallup Poll
    dropped 3 points, from 52 percent in mid-April to 49 percent in early
    May. Those who said they disapproved of the way he is handling his
    job as president increased by the same amount.

    Like Claude Raines in Casablanca, there are any number of people who
    claim they are "shocked, shocked" to discover that prisoners may have
    been tortured or abused. While upsetting -- and a potentially
    damaging revelation as far as U.S. diplomatic relations with the Arab
    world are concerned -- the news is hardly Earth shaking. Anyone with
    an even passing knowledge of what occurs in U.S. correctional
    facilities on a daily basis is aware that prisons are not, to put it
    mildly, nice places.

    Prisoners are assaulted -- and worse -- on a regular basis by other
    inmates and, if some claims are to be believed, also by their
    warders. The same is true in countless prisons and detention
    facilities throughout the world, some of the worst of which were
    located in Saddam Hussein's Iraq. There, prisoners were routinely
    tortured in unspeakable ways for political reasons or simply for
    amusement.

    While the purported incidents in the Abu Ghraib prison are disturbing
    by U.S. standards, they are fairly benign when measured against what
    goes on in the rest of the world. In reality, it is President George
    Bush's reaction that should really give the world pause, because it
    explains yet again why the United States is different from most other
    nations.

    In remarks following his meeting with King Abdullah II of Jordan,
    comments certain to be broadcast throughout the Arab world, Bush
    addressed the issue at length. The two leaders talked, Bush said,
    "about what has been on the TV screens recently, not only in our own
    country, but overseas -- the images of cruelty and humiliation."

    "I told His Majesty as plainly as I could that the wrongdoers will be
    brought to justice," Bush said, "and that the actions of those folks
    in Iraq do not represent the values of the United States of America."

    "I told him I was sorry for the humiliation suffered by the Iraqi
    prisoners, and the humiliation suffered by their families. I told him
    I was equally sorry that people who have been seeing those pictures
    didn't understand the true nature and heart of America."

    And, in what may be one of the most remarkable admissions ever made
    by a U.S. leader in wartime, "I assured him Americans, like me,
    didn't appreciate what we saw, that it made us sick to our stomachs.
    I also made it clear to His Majesty that the troops we have in Iraq,
    who are there for security and peace and freedom, are the finest of
    the fine, fantastic United States citizens, who represent the very
    best qualities of America: courage, love of freedom, compassion and
    decency."

    In the Arab world, where much worse torture and abuse is routine if
    not required, the president's words must come as a true revelation.
    The leader of the world's most powerful nation humbled himself and
    his country not just before its own citizens but before the people of
    the world, admitting that an injustice had been done, not by another
    nation but by the United States itself. More importantly is Bush's
    commitment that the perpetrators of the abuse would be punished and
    that steps would be taken to insure that the abuse would not occur
    again.

    Other nations are rarely if ever as public in their expressions of
    humility.

    The People's Republic of China has not apologized for the 1989
    massacre of pro-democracy demonstrators in Tiananmen Square. The
    Turkish government has never apologized for the slaughter of
    Armenians. Neither the Soviets nor the members of the Commonwealth of
    Independent States that succeeded it have fully atoned for the gulags
    or uttered meaningful expressions of remorse for the pogroms
    committed by the Czars against Russia's once considerable Jewish
    population.

    The Japanese have never fully atoned for the infamous 1937 "Rape of
    Nanking." The British are still silent about their invention of the
    concentration camp during the Boer War, the violence they perpetrated
    against the Irish people over centuries and for not doing all they
    could to alleviate 1942's Bengal famine that killed at least 2
    million people.

    An even longer list of similar atrocities, against which the alleged
    abuses in Abu Ghraib prison pale by comparison, could be assembled.
    What is unique to the Abu Ghraib incident is not the abuse but the
    apology.

    That Abu Ghraib matters, not even but especially at the highest
    levels of the U.S. government, should stand as proof before the world
    that the United States is a great nation full of good people who can
    do amazing things. It is not just a matter of not letting the single
    bad apple spoil the entire barrel but a triumph of the idea that, in
    the view of the United States, all men are created equal and should
    be treated accordingly, with respect.

    (The Peter Principles is a regular column on politics, culture and
    the media by Peter Roff, UPI political analyst and 20-year veteran of
    the Washington scene.)

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X