Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Istanbul 2nd Magistrates Court Rules in Favor of Armenian Patriarcha

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Istanbul 2nd Magistrates Court Rules in Favor of Armenian Patriarcha

    LRAPER Church Bulletin
    Armenian Patriarchate
    TR-34130 Kumkapi, Istanbul
    Contact: Deacon V. Seropyan
    T: +90 (212) 517-0970
    F: +90 (212) 516-4833
    E-mail: [email protected]
    or [email protected]


    Istanbul 2nd Magistrates Court Rules in Favor of Armenian Patriarchate

    In view of many accusatory, unfounded, reprehensible, discriminatory,
    provocative and false assertions made regarding His Beatitude the Patriarch
    and the Armenian community in an article by Soner Yigit entitled, "Former
    Eminonu Mayor Lutfi Kibiroglu: They Want To Turn Kumkapi Into Balat" which
    appeared in the 25 April 2004 issue of the daily Anadolu'da Vakit
    newspaper, Armenian Patriarchate lawyer and Patriarchate Press Spokesperson
    Luiz Bakar sent a notarized declaration of falsehood to the aforementioned
    newspaper on the 30th of April.

    In consequence of application made to the Istanbul 2nd Magistrates Criminal
    Court when the newspaper did not print the declaration of falsehood, the
    court found in favor of the request for a declaration of falsehood and
    rendered the verdict that the declaration of falsehood be printed in the
    next issue on the same page and in the same columns as the original article.
    As is well known, both the former and present mayors of Eminönü also
    declared the news item to be untrue.

    The text of the declaration of falsehood is as follows:

    THEY DO NOT WANT TO TURN KUMKAPI INTO BALAT
    "THE ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST MY CLIENT, MESROB MUTAFYAN, THE ARMENIAN
    PATRIARCH OF TURKEY, IN THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN THE 25 APRIL 2004 ISSUE
    (NO. 872) OF YOUR NEWSPAPER ARE UNFOUNDED, REPREHENSIBLE, DISCRIMINATORY AND
    UNTRUE."

    The article, "They Want To Turn Kumkapý Into Balat," written in an obviously
    one-sided fashion, is a concrete example of an irresponsible editorial
    philosophy that abuses persons' freedom and right to be informed.

    In the news article you published on page 10 with a large-point headline, to
    have former mayor of Eminonu Kibiroglu state that there was a sneaky plot
    behind the burning of historic buildings, that the buildings that burned
    down in Eminonu had been purchased by Armenian citizens, that a church was
    going to be built in place of the buildings that burned down and that the
    Patriarchate, the official office my client, the Patriarch, intended to
    establish an area that would be a center for 'proselytism' like the one in
    Balat; and to have the Patriarch say 'We want to get a place in Kumkapi,
    repair it and set it up; we're expanding,' represents your own false,
    unfounded, one-sided, non-factual, discriminatory, racist and fabricated
    interpretations, which constitute a provocation meant to create enmity
    between Muslim Turks and Armenian citizens of the Republic of Turkey.

    First of all, just as the Armenian Patriarchate, over which my client the
    Patriarch presides, has no intention of establishing a center for
    proselytism in Kumkapi and has engaged in no such undertaking, so also my
    client the Patriarch did not say "I want to establish a center for
    proselytism."

    Furthermore my client, the Patriarch and the Patriarchate which he
    represents, did not make any devious plan nor did they, for the sake of this
    plan, have buildings burned down or arson committed. The historic buildings
    that burned down in Eminonu were not bought by Armenian citizens of the
    Republic of Turkey. My client, the Patriarch, did not say, "We want to get a
    place in Kumkapi, repair it and set it up; we're expanding." The
    Patriarchate has no intention of having a church built on the site where the
    buildings burned down and no such activity exists.

    Your news article, which is reprehensible from start to finish, violates the
    principles of professionalism in journalism by creating an atmosphere that
    incites hatred and enmity, not just towards my client the Patriarch, but
    toward citizens of Armenian descent living in Turkey and against their
    institutions. Your news article, which is contrary to the truth, is clearly
    written from a partisan perspective which targets Armenians and belittles
    them and aims to stir up resentment and enmity. Your publication constitutes
    a clear attack on human rights. It exceeds the acceptable bounds of
    interpretation and criticism.

    As your publication has damaged the honor, personal dignity and public
    respect of my client, the Patriarch, to alleviate the moral damage done to
    my client's honor and respectability and person, you shall, by printing
    unchanged the text of this reply and correction statement, make known to the
    public that my client Does Not Want To Turn Kumkapi Into Balat, that he has
    no intention of building a church on the site of any burned down buildings,
    that he has not been involved in any devious plot, that he did not have old
    buildings burned down or arson committed, and that he did not want to create
    a center for proselytism in Kumkapi. I hope that you will not cast a shadow
    upon the respectability of the press and that you will put an end to such
    partisan publications.

    Respectfully,

    Att. Luiz Bakar
Working...
X