Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Senate Passes Bill Granting Armenia Permanent Normal Trade Relations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Senate Passes Bill Granting Armenia Permanent Normal Trade Relations

    UNINFO.GOV
    19 November 2004

    Senate Passes Bill Granting Armenia Permanent Normal Trade Relations
    Bill also includes provisions on Laos, dumping law repeal, tariff
    suspensions
    Washington -- The Senate has passed a bill that would make normal trade
    relations (NTR) -- otherwise known as most-favored nation status --
    permanent for Armenia
    The bill would also extend NTR to Laos and repeal a 1916 law that was ruled
    by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a violation of U.S. obligations.
    President Bush is expected to sign the bill into law.
    The 299-page bill, passed by the House of Representatives October 8,
    comprises hundreds of tariff suspensions on imports of goods not produced
    domestically and traded in small volumes.
    A provision of the bill would grant permanent NTR for Armenia, which has had
    temporary NTR, approved year-to-year by the president.
    "I hope that we will be able to consider similar treatment for Azerbaijan in
    the very near future," said Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican chairman of
    the Finance Committee.
    During Senate debate on normal trade relations for Laos, Grassley spoke in
    favor and argued that it would help alleviate poverty and bring the country
    into the global marketplace. Laos is one of only four countries worldwide
    and the only least-developed country to which the United States has not
    granted NTR.
    Senators from Wisconsin, home of about 33,000 Hmong refugees, argued against
    NTR because of what they called credible reports of Laotian army atrocities
    against the Hmong, a people inhabiting the mountainous regions of southern
    China and adjacent areas of Vietnam, Laos and Thailand.
    The Bush administration had pressed for passage of the NTR provisions and
    for repeal of the 1916 antidumping law.
    The WTO had ruled against the 1916 law, which was challenged by the European
    Union (EU) and Japan. Under the law -- never actually used from 1916 until
    the 1990s -- U.S. companies can sue foreign producers for triple damages for
    dumping goods on the U.S. market with the intent of injuring U.S. industry.
    To date no plaintiff has ever collected damages under the 1916 law although
    a recent verdict against a Japanese newspaper press manufacturer remains
    under appeal.
    The bill would repeal the 1916 law, but would not overturn any case already
    decided or pending under it. Whether Japan or the EU would accept such a
    non-retroactive change is not known.
    Miscellaneous tariff bills typically pass each session of Congress
    routinely, but this one was held up over a succession of issues for three
    years.
    Some other provisions of the bill would:
    -- Extend the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) to allow duty-free
    treatment for hand-woven and hand-knotted carpets, a provision designed
    primarily to help Afghanistan and Pakistan;
    -- Correct a mistake in the Trade Act of 2002 that inadvertently raised
    duties on certain Andean goods under the Andean Trade Preferences Act
    (ATPA);
    -- Clarify the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), extending
    retroactively to October 2000 duty-free treatment for collars and cuffs;
    -- Prohibit U.S. imports of archaeological, cultural and other rare items
    from Iraq to prevent illegal shipment of looted antiquities;
    -- Amend U.S. regulatory law concerning cellar treatment for both domestic
    and imported natural wine in line with a 2001 international agreement to
    eliminate testing of wine for reasons other than health and safety.
    Congressional sources have indicated they intended this provision to provide
    leverage in negotiations with the European Union to accept U.S. wine-making
    practices.
    (Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
    Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
Working...
X