Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crisis Profile - Why is tension resurfacing in Georgia?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crisis Profile - Why is tension resurfacing in Georgia?

    Reuters AlertNet, UK
    Nov 19 2004

    CRISIS PROFILE-Why is tension resurfacing in Georgia?

    By Theresa Freese


    People enjoy the view of old Tbilisi under the moon.
    Photo by DAVID MDZINARISHVILI

    What's the problem?

    Stability in the South Caucasus republic of Georgia is looking shaky
    in the semi-autonomous regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

    Where exactly is the South Caucasus?

    The South Caucasus consists of three states - Georgia, Armenia, and
    Azerbaijan. All are former Soviet republics pinned between the
    Russian Federation and the Middle East from north to south and the
    Black Sea and Caspian Sea from east to west.

    The Caucasus Mountains range divides and, Georgians claim, protects
    the country from its northern neighbour.

    Lying just beyond these mountains are the North Caucasus republics of
    Russia: Chechnya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, North Ossetia,
    Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachai-Cherkessia, and Adygheia.

    Why are there so many disputes in this region?

    It's a familiar story of Soviet nationalities policies and
    ethnopolitical tensions tearing apart states. Most of the disputes go
    back to when the Soviet Union broke apart in 1991, when autonomous
    republics and regions clamoured for independence.

    Ossetia was integrated into the Russian Empire in the late 18th
    century, but divided between 1922 and 1924, when the South became an
    autonomous region of Georgia and the North an autonomous republic of
    Russia.

    About 60,000 people live in South Ossetia. The population of North
    Ossetia is more than 700,000.

    When Georgia became a sovereign state after the collapse of the
    Soviet Union, South Ossetia's leadership seceded from Georgian rule
    and went to war.

    Thousands of people were killed and displaced between 1989 and 1992,
    but South Ossetia's population won de facto independence - but with
    amorphous borders.

    Abkhazia's 1992-1993 war was much bloodier, claiming some 10,000
    lives and uprooting tens of thousands of people - but the republic
    achieved a solid boundary with Georgia.

    Why do people in South Ossetia and Abkhazia reject Georgia?

    They have grown accustomed to independence and fear Georgia will
    attempt to retake their territories by force. They worry about
    becoming a marginalised ethnic minority within Georgia.

    Russia's economic and political involvement complicates the
    situation.

    What is Russia's involvement?

    Both South Ossetia and Abkhazia owe their autonomy largely to Russian
    backing.

    Russia provides their inhabitants with Russian passports and
    residency documents, allowing free movement into Russia.

    Through them, the Abkhaz and Ossetians receive Russian pensions,
    which are much higher than pensions from the Georgian state.

    Georgians allege they receive military training and equipment.

    In addition to its peacekeeping bases in South Ossetia and Abkhazia,
    Russia maintains military bases in Georgia proper.

    Some government officials are direct imports from Russia. The
    currency is the Russian ruble, and there are Russian flags and
    posters of Russian President Vladimir Putin everywhere.

    Why is Russia doing this?

    Mostly for geopolitical reasons. Many regional experts claim they
    provide Russia with a foothold south of the Caucasus mountains.

    At the same time, Russia is concerned about separatist movements in
    its federation. If Abkhazia or South Ossetia successfully became
    breakaway states, Chechnya's calls for independence could be
    validated.

    However, Russia apparently does not want to see Abkhazia and South
    Ossetia fall back under Georgian sovereignty. Instead, it avoids
    officially recognising Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent
    republics but provides other types of support.

    Why is the tension rising now?

    President Mikheil Saakashvili came to power in the `rose revolution'
    of November 2003, after mass demonstrations prompted by flawed
    parliamentary elections resulted in the bloodless removal of his
    predecessor, Eduard Shevardnadze

    Whereas Shevardnadze is widely seen as having let the conflicts
    freeze -- and even allowing his government to profit from them --
    Saakashvili promised to re-establish Georgia's territorial integrity
    by bringing three breakaway regions under control.

    Georgia needs to settle these conflicts and get foreign troops off
    its soil in order to achieve its long-term aim of joining NATO and
    the European Union. It stands to reduce corruption, crime and the
    trade in contraband, narcotics and weapons that results from porous
    borders. Both the Abkhaz and Ossetians, as well as many Georgians,
    survive on smuggling numerous products between Russia and Georgia.

    How did the president start his campaign?

    President Saakashvili's first target was the autonomous republic of
    Ajaria.

    He succeeded in regaining control in May 2004, when the region's
    leader -- Aslan Abashidze -- fled to Russia.

    Unlike Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Ajaria had had no history of
    conflict with Georgia proper, and the majority of residents are
    ethnic Georgians.

    When did things begin heating up in South Ossetia?

    The tension started rising in June 2004, and the conflict heated up
    in August. The mid-October shooting of peacekeepers in South Ossetia
    signaled a return to violence after a summer of fighting had given
    way to tenuous peace.

    The September massacre of more than 330 hostages after armed men
    seized a school in Beslan, North Ossetia, was another blow to
    stability.

    Arguably overconfident after its success in Ajaria, Georgia moved
    quickly without a well-planned strategy.

    The Georgian crackdown on smuggling from Russia was designed to cut
    off income to Ossetian authorities in Tskhinvali, South Ossetia's
    capital.

    However, it also damaged the livelihoods of Ossetian and Georgian
    communities and severed the only real interaction between them.

    The Georgian government launched humanitarian aid and cultural
    initiatives to garner popular support among Ossetians, but since
    authorities were always accompanied by journalists, their activities
    were perceived as show.

    Armed Ossetians responded by closing roads linking disputed
    territories. They detained Georgians on or near Ossetian lands, and
    prevented Georgian media from operating freely.

    Many Ossetians ceased communication with their Georgian neighbors,
    reportedly under threat of being detained or losing their jobs or
    pensions.

    So is it just a question of coming to some agreement?

    Ossetians and the Abkhaz firmly reject Georgian rule, while Georgian
    residents in South Ossetia are adamant that they will never live
    under Ossetian authority.

    Georgian authorities say they never intended for events to degenerate
    into a conflict. But the conflict incited fears in both Abkhazia and
    South Ossetia that Georgia's new leadership could be aggressive.

    They are offering South Ossetia and Abkhazia wide autonomy within
    Georgia, but cannot define this.

    The population of Abkhazia halved after the 1992-1993 war, when
    ethnic Georgians left or were driven out. Only a small group of
    Georgians remains in the disputed Gali district - under Abkhazian
    authority.

    The republic has less than 250,000 inhabitants, compared with 536,000
    before the war. The population of the Abkhaz capita, Sukhumi, was
    also cut in half.

    South Ossetia remains ethnically mixed, but Georgian-controlled
    villages remain in its centre.

    What are the humanitarian consequences of the tension?

    People living on both the Georgian and South Ossetian sides of the
    conflict zone are suffering.

    Many buildings have been heavily hit by shelling.

    People in the region -- particularly those with damaged homes --
    worry about surviving the winter for lack of firewood. Venturing into
    the woods is dangerous. Villagers have disappeared, been killed by
    landmines, beaten, detained or bribed.

    Georgians are worried about Ossetian forces targeting their schools,
    since some were heavily hit over the summer, and some families are
    moving or sending their children elsewhere to study.

    Georgia's crackdown on contraband has left many people without
    incomes. Some are unable to buy staple food items such as flour,
    cooking oil and sugar.

    Information on the situation in South Ossetia is difficult to obtain
    or verify but Ossetians are reportedly experiencing similar problems.


    At least eight civilians and peacekeepers have been killed or wounded
    since the ceasefire began in South Ossetia on August 19.

    What is going on in Abkhazia?

    Abkhazia has been on the brink of civil unrest since disputed
    presidential elections in early October 2004.

    Abkhazia may pose a more difficult challenge to Saakashvili's
    government than South Ossetia. Given its Black Sea coast, it has
    greater strategic, economic, and historical importance for Russia.

    Peace in Abkhazia has been shaky since its 1993 cease-fire agreement.
    A May 1998 special operation in Gali almost threw the republic back
    into a full-scale war.

    Worsening matters, the Abkhaz defense ministry reports that Georgia
    is building up its forces along its border with Abkhazia.

    What are the effects on regional stability?

    Neighbouring North Caucasus republics could get involved, either to
    call for independence from Russia or to support the Abkhaz or
    Ossetians.

    Former fighters from Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachai-Cherkessia, and
    Adygheia are already politically involved in Abkhazia's election
    dispute.

    Chechens supported the Abkhaz in their war against Georgia. Some say
    they might now support Georgia against Russia in South Ossetia.

    North Ossetia, meanwhile, has territorial disagreements with
    Ingushetia and could get stuck in a two-front war if the South
    Ossetia conflict escalates.

    Who's keeping the peace?

    In South Ossetia, a Joint Control Commission representing Georgia,
    South Ossetia, North Ossetia and Russia, as well as Joint
    Peacekeeping Forces representing Georgia, Russia, and North Ossetia
    are meant to prevent the escalation of the South Ossetia conflict.

    Because Russia backs the Ossetians, Georgia claims it stands alone in
    these institutions.

    Georgia has signed an agreement with South Ossetia's leader, Eduard
    Kokoeti, that would prevent all armed formations except peacekeepers
    and police inside the South Ossetia conflict zone.

    But this will be difficult, many say impossible, to achieve.
    Moreover, definition of the conflict zone is currently being
    contested by Georgia.

    The Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) is
    seen by many analysts as the only objective body operating in South
    Ossetia.

    However, since Russia is an OSCE member state, it is difficult for
    the organisation to expand its mandate to increase its observation
    capabilities.

    With only five military observers on the ground, the OSCE has little
    chance of covering the region effectively.

    The United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) performs a
    similar function in Abkhazia and faces analagous obstacles.

    It gave the peacekeeping mandate to the Commonwealth of Independent
    States, and the contingent is entirely made up of Russians.
    Negotiations between Georgia and Abkhazia on this point have come to
    a halt since Saakashvili became president.
Working...
X