Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Analysis: EU's Turkish challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Analysis: EU's Turkish challenge

    BBC News
    Oct 6 2004

    Analysis: EU's Turkish challenge

    By Paul Reynolds
    BBC News Online world affairs correspondent


    Turkey's accession to the European Union would not only bring a huge
    Muslim population into the EU, but would extend its boundaries deep
    into the Caucasus mountains and down towards the plains of ancient
    Mesopotamia.

    Turkey - a bridge between East and West?

    The EU would have borders with Syria, Iraq, Iran, Georgia and
    Armenia.

    For some this would be a good thing. Turkey was once the "sick man of
    Europe" as its empire began to decay and other powers circled around,
    fighting each other, as in Crimea.



    Turkey as a bridge

    Now it would be a link between East and West, between a continent
    with a Christian history and a land of Muslim faith in which both
    would respect religion, but not rely on religion to determine the
    course of government.

    It would extend the ties developed with Turkey through Nato into the
    more fundamental ties of political association.

    It would build on the strong secular nature of Turkish public life
    forged by the great Kemal Ataturk, who fought the British at
    Gallipoli before leaving a legacy of modernism influential to this
    day.



    Turkey's acceptance, it is felt, would erase the centuries of
    conflict in which the Ottoman Empire sought to stretch its hand into
    Europe and where memories of battles against the Turk still linger.


    The EU, after all, is designed not to forget history but to overcome
    it.


    The siege of Vienna

    Only recently was one such battle, the siege of Vienna in 1683,
    invoked by a European commissioner to argue against Turkish entry.

    "The liberation of 1683 would have been in vain," declared Dutch
    commissioner Frits Bolkenstein.

    In that siege, it was the Polish King Jan Sobieski who led a force
    which drove the Turks away. How appropriate, those favouring Turkish
    entry now argue, that Catholic Poland and Muslim Turkey might one day
    join together in the Union.

    How much more compelling would be a final rapprochement between
    Greece and Turkey - and a settlement in Cyprus which would obviously
    have to be part of any accession agreement.


    An enlargement too far?


    For others, Turkey would be an enlargement too far. Turkey is not
    really a European country, they argue, despite its foothold on the
    European continent across the Bosphorus.

    The reforms are sufficient for talks, but not yet sufficient for
    membership

    Your say: Should Turkey join?

    Its population, already 69 million, is second only to that of
    Germany, which has 82m. But projections for Turkey's people go up and
    for Germany's go down so that by mid-century, Turkey would probably
    have the largest population in the EU.

    That population, it is further argued, would be mainly Muslim and
    despite the influence of the secular Ataturk, the influence of the
    fervent Enver Pasha might one day prevail.

    Enver Pasha, one of the "Young Turks" who overthrew the remnants of
    the Ottoman sultanate, had a vision of extending Turkish and Muslim
    rule to the peoples of the Caucasus. During World War I, he threw his
    lot in with the central powers of Germany and Austria and attacked
    the Russians during a winter campaign, which proved disastrous.

    The Armenian people of eastern Turkey were force-marched south and
    west, in one of the earliest examples of ethnic cleansing in the 20th
    Century.

    But it is not the past as much as the future which worries some
    modern European governments.

    One basic rule of the EU is the free movement of goods and people.
    The prospect of millions of poor Anatolians flooding into the EU is
    one which easily raises European concerns. Restrictions on such
    movement for some years might well form part of accession conditions.



    The third view


    There is a third view - that accession talks might not even lead to
    Turkish membership.

    John Palmer, political director of the European Policy Centre in
    Brussels, said: "It is certain that the EU will set a date for
    negotiations with Turkey at the summit in December.

    "The reforms are sufficient for talks, but not yet sufficient for
    membership. They will be unusual talks. Both sides agree that it will
    be 15 to 20 years before a decision is required. In my opinion,
    Turkey will not worry about the time. What matters is that the
    process of Turkish transformation is linked to the process of
    negotiation.

    "The separate question is whether at the end of this, there will be a
    yes decision by both sides. I do not think that there is a
    pre-ordained outcome to that."


    Turkey will force the EU to debate what it is and what it wants to
    be.

    I first became aware that Turkey might not be a welcome member of the
    European club in 1984, when Claude Cheysson, who had just ended a
    spell as French foreign minister, asked a group of British
    correspondents over an excellent dinner in Strasbourg: "Is Turkey
    European?"

    Being an accomplished diplomat, he had avoided giving a direct reply
    about Turkish membership and accompanied his own question with a
    shrug of the shoulders and a quizzical smile. Turkey was something to
    be left for another year - or century. We moved on to the cheese.

    His question has not yet been fully answered.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3719418.stm
Working...
X