Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

House Passes Bill Repealing 1916 Dumping Law WTO Ruled Illegal: Norm

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • House Passes Bill Repealing 1916 Dumping Law WTO Ruled Illegal: Norm

    House Passes Bill Repealing 1916 Dumping Law WTO Ruled Illegal

    Normal trade relations for Armenia, Laos among hundreds of provisions

    Washington File
    12 October 2004

    By Bruce Odessey, Washington File Staff Writer

    Washington -- The House of Representatives has given final passage to a bill
    that would repeal a dumping law that was ruled illegal by the World Trade
    Organization (WTO) and would extend permanent normal trade relations to
    Armenia and Laos.

    To become law the bill would have to be passed by the Senate and signed by
    the president. Whether the Senate will consider the bill when Congress
    returns November 16 from its election recess is not known.

    Most of the 299-page bill, passed by the House late October 8 without
    debate, comprises hundreds of tariff suspensions on imports of goods not
    produced domestically and traded in small volumes.

    Repeal of the 1916 antidumping law was slipped into the final version of the
    miscellaneous tariffs bill by House and Senate negotiators even though
    neither chamber had earlier passed such a provision.

    The House Judiciary Committee had approved the provision, however, and U.S.
    Trade Representative Robert Zoellick had urged its passage.

    The WTO had ruled against the 1916 antidumping law, which was challenged by
    the European Union (EU) and Japan. Under the law, never actually used from
    1916 until the 1990s, U.S. companies can sue foreign producers for triple
    damages for dumping goods on the U.S. market with the intent of injuring
    U.S. industry.

    To date no plaintiff has ever collected damages under the 1916 law. In May,
    however, a U.S. federal court upheld a jury verdict ordering a Japanese
    newspaper press manufacturer to pay its U.S. rival more than $30 million,
    triple the damages from dumping as calculated by the jury. That case remains
    under appeal.

    The provision in the miscellaneous tariffs bill would repeal the 1916 law
    but would not overturn any case already decided or pending under the law.
    Whether Japan or the EU would accept such a nonretroactive change is not
    known.

    The WTO had already authorized retaliation by the EU against any final
    judgment ordered under the law against an EU company.

    Another provision of the miscellaneous tariffs bill would grant permanent
    normal trade relations for Armenia. Normal trade relations (NTR), otherwise
    known as most-favored-nation treatment, prohibit discrimination among a
    country's trading partners. Armenia has had temporary NTR, approved year to
    year by the president.

    The bill would also extend NTR to Laos, bringing into force a 1997 U.S.-Laos
    trade agreement. Laos remains one of only four countries worldwide and the
    only least-developed country to which the United States does not extend NTR.

    Miscellaneous tariff bills typically pass each session of Congress
    routinely, but this one was held up over a succession of issues for three
    years. One senator from a southern textile-producing state delayed Senate
    action, for example, until he achieved a change requiring clearer
    country-of-origin labeling for socks.

    Following are some other provisions of the bill:

    -- A provision that would correct a mistake in the Trade Act of 2002 that
    inadvertently raised duties on Andean handbags, luggage, flat goods, work
    gloves and leather wearing apparel under the Andean Trade Preferences Act
    (ATPA).

    -- A provision that would clarify the African Growth and Opportunity Act
    (AGOA), extending retroactively to October 2000 duty-free treatment for
    collars and cuffs.

    -- A provision that would temporarily prohibit U.S. imports of
    archaeological, cultural and other rare items from Iraq to prevent illegal
    shipment of such antiquities.

    -- In line with a 2001 international agreement to eliminate testing of wine
    for reasons other than health and safety, a provision that would amend U.S.
    regulatory law concerning cellar treatment for both domestic and imported
    natural wine.

    The EU has refused to accept U.S. wine-making practices and has waived its
    rules to allow wine imported from the United States but only through 2005.
    Congressional negotiators have indicated they intended this provision as
    leverage in U.S.-EU negotiations, which have achieved no agreement so far.

    -- A provision that would require the U.S. customs agency in the Department
    of Homeland Security to establish integrated border inspection areas along
    the U.S.-Canadian border. In these areas U.S. customs officers could inspect
    vehicles before they entered the United States from Canada, and Canadian
    customs officials could inspect vehicles before they entered Canada from the
    United States.


    (The Washington File is a product of the Bureau of International Information
    Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
Working...
X