Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First Euro Armenian Convention Declares Values, Views, Advocacy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • First Euro Armenian Convention Declares Values, Views, Advocacy

    EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION
    for Justice and Democracy
    Avenue de la Renaissance 10
    B - 1000 BRUSSELS
    Tel. +32 (0)2 732 70 26
    Tel. /Fax. +32 (0)2 732 70 27
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Website: www.eafjd.org


    PRESS RELEASE

    For Immediate Release
    Contact: Talline Tachdjian
    Tel. +32 (0)2 732 70 26
    October 19th, 2004


    FIRST EUROPEAN ARMENIAN CONVENTION ISSUES DECLARATION AFFIRMING ITS
    VALUES, VIEWS, AND ADVOCACY AGENDA

    BRUSSELS. BELGIUM (October 19th, 2004) - The first Convention of
    European Armenians, convened at the European Parliament, closed today
    with the adoption of a final declaration affirming its support for
    fundamental European values, the need for the increased promotion of
    Armenian identity within Europe, the further integration of Armenia into
    the European family of nations, and strong opposition to
    Turkey's candidacy for membership in the European Union.

    These points were agreed to by acclamation by the more than two hundred
    and fifty delegates to the European Armenian Federation for Justice and
    Democracy (EAFJD) Convention, the first of its kind on the European
    continent. The declaration will be sent to the twenty-five member
    states of the European Union.

    The challenges of the EU enlargement process

    Today's progam opened with a panel on `The challenges of
    the EU enlargement process,' moderated by Phillipe Kalfayan, the
    Deputy Secretary General of the International Federation of Human Rights
    (FIDH). In a sweeping introduction to this topic, Kalfayan touched on
    the security, religious and cultural dimensions to Turkey's
    candidacy for membership in the European Union, as well as the impact of
    internal Turkish policy on its relations with European institutions.

    The first speaker was Prof. Bernard Coulie, a noted historian and the
    Rector of the Catholic University of Louvain. Drawing on a reservoir of
    historical understanding of Armenia's longstanding relations
    with Europe, Prof. Coulie discussed the prospects for Armenia -
    and, with it, the Armenian Diaspora, - drawing closer to the
    European Union. He noted with certainty that Armenia will either be in
    or on the border with the European Union, as a member or close neighbor.
    The Armenian communtiy of Europe, he explained, will play an
    increasingly vital catalyst role in bringing Armenia and Europe closer
    together.

    The second speaker of the day was Jean Varoujan Sirapian, the Chairman
    of the Armenian Liberal Democratic (Ramgavar) Party in France. He
    spelled out, in a point by point analysis, why Turkey's
    acceptance into the European Union would contradict the spirit of the
    Union's founding and, ultimately, undermine the interests and
    values of this vital institution. He sharply criticized the recent
    reports issued by the European Commission about Turkey which point out
    its many failures, but nonetheless still recommended opening talks on
    membership. He announced the publication of a report by the Chobanian
    Institute that makes the case against Turkey's acceptance into
    the EU.

    The next speaker, Harlem Desir, was the Vice-President of the Socialist
    Group in the European Parliament. He stressed the twin points that
    Turkey must be held accountable for meeting the EU criteria, but that,
    once these points have been met, Turkey could rightfully be considered
    for membership. He stressed his efforts and the work of his Party in
    pressing Turkey to recognize the Armenian Genocide and noted his regret
    that the EU did not formally set Armenian Genocide recognition as a
    precondition for membership. Desir made the point that Turkey must do
    what Germany and France have done, namely come to terms with their
    history. Doing so will not be a setback for Turkey, but rather a
    victory for truth. The EU, he noted, should use Turkey's
    interest in membership as leverage to secure continued reforms.

    In a spirited and compelling presentation, the next speaker, Frank
    Biancheri, analyzed the practical prospects for Turkey's
    acceptance into the EU. Biancheri, the Chairman of the think tank
    TIESweb, argued that - for a myriad of domestic and
    international reasons - Turkey's membership was highly
    unrealistic during the next twenty years. The fact is, he said, that
    the forces against Turkey's membership have set forth arguments
    that have resonance across Europe, while pro-Turkey elements have been
    limited to parts of ruling European elites. Given the likelihood of
    referendums on Turkey's acceptance, the chances for approval are
    very low. He argued, instead, for a Priviledged Partnership
    relationship as a realistic alternative.

    The final speaker on the panel was Charles Papazian, representing the
    Western Europe branch of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation. His
    remarks on Turkey's EU candidacy argued that its acceptance
    would run counter to European values and public opinion across the
    continent. He outlined the basis for this opposition, on issues ranging
    from genocide denial, blockades, human rights, treatment of minorities,
    the continued occupation of Cyprus, and the role of religion in Turkish
    society. He stressed the growing gap on this issue between governing
    European elites and the broad cross section of popular opinion. He
    closed by discussing the ARF's advocacy and grassroots efforts
    in Brussels and throughout Europe in opposing Turkey's
    membership, culmintating in a December 17th demonstration outside of the
    European Commission building.

    The question and answer period was especially spirited and lasted nearly
    two hours. Among the issues raised were the lowering of EU standards
    for Turkey, the role of public opinion on Turkey's candidacy,
    and the sincerity of pronouncements by members of Turkey's
    governing elites concerning the EU. During this discussion, remarks
    were offered by Charles Tannock, MEP (Christian Democrat, UK), who
    criticized the moral double standard being applied to Turkey. He warned
    of the large costs of bringing Turkey into the Union and stressed that
    serious attention should be devoted to the issues of fundamental
    cultural differences, and the role of Islam in Turkey. He predicted
    that the top-driven agenda of getting Turkey in the EU will come to a
    halt as national referendums are held on this issue.
    Declaration
    Following the question and answer session, Hilda Tchoboian, the
    Chairperson of the EAFJD, read the Charter of the Convention of
    European-Armenians and the Declaration of the Convention, which were
    approved unanimously by acclamation. Her comments were followed by
    closing remarks by Garo Armenian, member of the ARF Bureau and the
    Chairman of the Armenian National Committee international coordinating
    body. In his comments, Armenian praised this historic beginning and
    noted the progress made by Europe's Armenian community in
    emerging as a political force on the European stage. He stressed the
    success of the EAFJD in developing a Europe-wide consensus, and
    organizing focused and effective advocacy in the key European capitals.
    He closed his comments by noting for all in attendance that the real
    work for Europe's increasingly vibrant Armenian community lies
    ahead.
    Press Conference

    Following the formal program, Hilda Tchoboian and EAFJD Executive
    Director Laurent Leylekian held a press conference for the several dozen
    print and broadcast journalists at the Convention.


    ######
    Enclosures:
    - Charter of the Convention of European-Armenians (in Armenian)

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X