Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Old Habits Die Hard!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Old Habits Die Hard!

    Kurdistan Observer
    Oct 23 2004


    KurdistanObserver.com

    Old Habits Die Hard!

    By: Dr. Nazhad Khasraw Hawramany


    The President:
    The Iraqi interim president Sheikh al-Yawar must thank the Kurdish
    people and Kurdish leadership for the tremendous support they have
    given him during the thorny process of electing an interim President.
    As usual the Kurdish leadership's rivalry made them prefer an Arab
    president instead of uniting and agreeing among themselves on a
    Kurdish candidate. The new president is an Iraqi tribal chief who is
    wearing an Arab robe and head dress is apparently adamant on his
    identity, ignoring the fact that he is supposed to be a president( ad
    interim) of all constituents of Iraqi mosaic( Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen,
    Christians) and not emphasizing the Arab domination of Iraqi destiny.
    The shocking interview of Mr. Al-Yawar to the Arab satellite
    television station ( Al-Arabiya) lately, in which he labeled the
    Kurdish demonstrators of the Kurdish Referendum Movement, who were
    calling for the right of self-determination of Kurdish people in
    Iraq, as traitors and threatening to crush any such movement with
    force has sent shock waves through Iraqi Kurdistan (and I hope
    through the Kurdish leadership too!), and reminded them of the ugly
    Arab chauvinism in Iraq which was too often expressed and implemented
    by previous Iraqi presidents like Abdulsalam Arif , Ahmad Hassan
    Al-Bakr and Saddam Hussein. Mr. Al-Yawar ( being newly wed into a
    prominent Kurdish woman minister) could not hide his true
    chauvinistic nature and his contempt for the right of Kurdish people
    to express openly and in a democratic way their ambitions and
    aspirations. Mr. President actually should have congratulated the
    Kurdish people for resorting to democratic means of expression. This
    is certainly not the model of democracy the Kurds and Iraqi peoples
    are looking for in the new post-Saddam Iraq!.

    The Governor:
    The governor of Diyala province in the north east of Iraq, is bitter
    that the Kurds in parts of Kurdistan annexed to his governorate(
    Khanaquin, Mandali, Shahraban, Saadiah) are adamant on redressing the
    ill effects of the ugly Arabization campaigns of Saddam Hussein, he
    wants the Arab settlers who fled the region after the downfall of
    their Godfather Saddam Hussein to be allowed back into Kurdish lands
    and is antagonizing those Kurds who reclaim their lands and
    properties which were confiscated by the Baath regime and given to
    Arab settlers brought from central and south Iraq. Ten young Kurdish
    recruits from Khanaquin were lured to the building of Diyala
    governorate by the cronies of Diyala governor and were brutally
    murdered under the watching eyes of Arab police forces there. The
    governor is continuing the Arabization policies of Saddam Hussein
    there, he is refusing to appoint Kurdish citizens for the public
    posts, he is depriving the Kurdish towns from any reconstruction
    projects, he has even refused to open Mortgage Banks in the Kurdish
    towns of his province although it was opened in all the other Arab
    towns in the same province, just to deprive the Kurds from any
    chances to build new homes. The central Iraqi government is
    apparently endorsing such discriminatory actions of the governor. How
    could we allow such an affront to continue!.

    The Neighbour:

    Our northern neigbours apparently haven't wake up from the joy of
    their barbaric massacres against Armenians and Kurds at the onset of
    the last century, which the world even today is hesitant to condemn
    and acknowledge as they did for example for the Holocoust of the Jews
    during the Nazi reign in Germany. The Turks did get away almost
    unscathed and that encourages them to continue their ultranationalist
    and backward ideology of one state-one nation-one culture-one
    language, depriving the Kurdish children of having Kurdish names and
    learning their mother tongue in schools, still ignoring the existence
    of a second major ethnic group in Turkey ( the Kurds) which
    constitutes more than one third of the population with own
    distinctive culture and language which is entirely different from
    Turkish culture and language. The Turks are not satisfied with the
    immense oppression and discrimination they perpetrated on their
    Kurdish citizens in Northern Kurdistan, they are trying to extend
    their hatred towards Iraqi Kurds in South Kurdistan and keep meddling
    in in the internal affairs of South Kurdistan, they have nominated
    themselves as the godfather of Iraqi Turkmen and are shedding
    crocodile tears about the fate of Turkmen in the Kurdistani city of
    Kirkuk, and how some of the 300,000 Kurds deported from Kirkuk during
    Arabization campaigns of Saddam Hussein are returning back to Kirkuk
    to claim their homes and properties und to the Turkish taste
    upsetting the demographic realities of Kirkuk, deliberately ignoring
    the facts that the Turkmen have never been better as their current
    situation in Iraqi Kurdistan (including Kirkuk). The Turks want the
    Kurdish victims of Saddam Hussein to relinquish their rights to go
    back to their ancestral hometown , just to satisfy the chauvinistic
    kamalistic ego of the sick Turkish republic. The Turks are giving
    themselves the right to interfere in the future of Kirkuk, they are
    still behaving with the Ottoman colonialist mentality. The Destiny of
    Kirkuk and the procedures to settle the disputes about Kirkuk is an
    Iraqi issue and is elaborated in detail in the Transitional
    Administrative Law (TAL), the interim constitution of Iraq. Iraqi
    peoples certainly does not need the greedy neighbors, the previous
    collaborators of Saddam regime to interfere in the affairs of the new
    Iraq. The events in Iraq shows that foreign adventures could cost
    them dearly.

    The Super Power:
    Since the artificial establishment of the Iraqi state in 1921 and the
    subsequent forcible annexation of Iraqi Kurdistan to Iraq against the
    will of Kurdish people, Iraq has been dominated by the Arab Sunni
    minority subjecting the other main constituents of Iraqi society
    mainly the Arab Shiite and the Kurds to all kinds of discrimination
    and oppression culminating in use of WMD against Kurds in Halabja
    1988, genocidal Anfall campaigns against Kurds 1986-1988, the
    indiscriminate murdering of Shiites in 1991. The fall of Saddam
    regime on the 9th April 2003 has caused the fall of the old Iraqi
    establishment and with it the new forces are now trying to remodel
    the Iraqi state on a federal basis or in worst case scenario the
    alternative is to disintegrate into 3 states, Kurdish in the north
    and north east, Sunni in central and west Iraq and Shiite in South
    Iraq. The only way to keep Iraq as a unitary state seems in building
    a democratic federal Iraq which is equally shared between Kurds,
    Sunnis and Shiites, and this constitutes a huge insurmountable task
    taking into consideration the restrictive and intolerant mentality of
    the Middle East peoples. The American administration so far is
    clinching to the prospect of keeping Iraq united at any cost , not
    the least to satisfy its neighbors, such a policy could be impossible
    to implement considering the current turmoil in Iraq, the Americans
    must be ready to sketch plan B and that is to divide Iraq into 3
    states, a conference between those different groups should decide the
    division of Iraqi wealth between those states. Times are changing ,
    old policies and doctrines must also change.

    Dr.Nazhad Khasraw Hawramany
    Switzeralnd

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X