Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paper Sees Armenian Leader's Georgian Visit as Betrayal of Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paper Sees Armenian Leader's Georgian Visit as Betrayal of Russia

    PAPER SEES ARMENIAN LEADER'S GEORGIAN VISIT AS BETRAYAL OF RUSSIA

    Aravot, Yerevan
    23 Oct 04


    Text of Tigran Avetisyan's report entitled "An obvious misfortune" by
    the Armenian newspaper Aravot on 23 October

    Robert Kocharyan's official visit to Georgia is a very difficult
    one. The reason for that is that during the visit he is forced to
    "betray" Moscow a little. But as it is known such things make our
    senior "partner" very nervous. For instance, under today's protocol,
    Robert Kocharyan laid wreaths at the grave of the heroes who died
    fighting for "Georgia's territorial integrity ". It is known that a
    great majority of these heroes were killed in Abkhazia when they were
    fighting against the Abkhaz separatists, that is, against Russia. It
    turns out that the Armenian leader showed his respect for the memory
    of those who fought against his country's partner, Russia, and by this
    he indirectly recognized Tbilisi's power over Abkhazia. But there is
    yet another aspect of the problem.

    A difficult situation can be avoided if one tackles things with
    circumspection. It is no secret that different state officials voice
    opinions about Armenia's foreign policy which seldom coincide.

    Let us say, a top Foreign Ministry official said that we should have
    good relations with all our neighbours and especially with Georgia,
    because the main roads connecting Armenia with the outside world go
    through this country. Having such a clever diplomat is not enough to
    keep us happy. Then one deputy said that it is necessary to restore
    the Yerevan-Sukhumi-Tbilisi railway. What do you think Tbilisi's
    attitude to us will be after such a statement from the Armenian top
    official? Although such statements complicate relations between
    Armenia and Georgia (which are conditioned by a third party) they are
    also evidence of the fact that the Armenian political thinking has
    depreciated a lot.

    Let us try to understand: who is the above mentioned call for the
    opening of the railway directed at? Is it Georgia? But even a baby can
    see that until relations between Georgia and Abkhazia improve, Tbilisi
    will be unable to open the railway irrespective of the statements by
    "prominent" Armenian officials.

    In that case, was the call directed at Moscow? As awful as this might
    sound, that was probably the case. It turns out that the Armenian
    parliament demands from Russia that it enter forcefully into Georgia
    and via its territory to establish a railway link between Armenia and
    Russia. Now imagine the kind of treatment received by Kocharyan in
    Tbilisi, if Armenia does not keep in check "deep" political ideas of
    some politicians.
Working...
X