RESULTS OF PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION OF ARMENIAN OFFICER'S MURDERER RAMIL SAFAROV LIKELY TO BE ANNOUNCED IN MAY
YEREVAN, APRIL 7, NOYAN TAPAN. The results of the second psychiatric
examination on the murder of the RA Armed Forces officer Gurgen
Margarian in Bydapest are unlikely to be announced soon - it is
not ruled out that they will be made public only at the trial
to be restarted on May 10. NT correspondent was informed about
this by the representative of the aggrieved party, lawyer Nazeli
Vardanian. According to her, the Azeri experts may be present at the
second examination to be conducted in Budapest next week only with the
Hungarian doctors' permission. N. Vardanian reminded that the court
rejected the Azeri side's petition to participate in the examination
and preparation of its conclusion. To recap, according to a psychiatric
conclusion on the case of Gurgen Margarian's murder committed by Ramil
Safarov with extreme brutaly, R. Safarov was recognized healthy. The
doctors who had conducted the examination were questioned in the
court. They assert they are ready to insist on their conclusion.
YEREVAN, APRIL 7, NOYAN TAPAN. The results of the second psychiatric
examination on the murder of the RA Armed Forces officer Gurgen
Margarian in Bydapest are unlikely to be announced soon - it is
not ruled out that they will be made public only at the trial
to be restarted on May 10. NT correspondent was informed about
this by the representative of the aggrieved party, lawyer Nazeli
Vardanian. According to her, the Azeri experts may be present at the
second examination to be conducted in Budapest next week only with the
Hungarian doctors' permission. N. Vardanian reminded that the court
rejected the Azeri side's petition to participate in the examination
and preparation of its conclusion. To recap, according to a psychiatric
conclusion on the case of Gurgen Margarian's murder committed by Ramil
Safarov with extreme brutaly, R. Safarov was recognized healthy. The
doctors who had conducted the examination were questioned in the
court. They assert they are ready to insist on their conclusion.