Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

90years after the 'Great Slaughter' Armenians still seek recognition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 90years after the 'Great Slaughter' Armenians still seek recognition

    Associated Press Worldstream
    April 14, 2005 Thursday 8:35 PM Eastern Time

    90 years after start of 'Great Slaughter,' Armenians still seek
    recognition of genocide

    MIKE ECKEL; Associated Press Writer

    YEREVAN, Armenia

    At 102, Gulinia Musoyan is still horrified when she thinks of what
    happened to her as a child in Ottoman Turkey - rousted from her home
    in the middle of the night, forced to trudge shoeless for days
    through the desert alongside thousands of others, with the weak
    killed or left to die in the blazing, rocky wastelands.

    Ninety years later, the suffering endured by Musoyan and hundreds of
    thousands of other Armenians is gaining sympathy worldwide, but not
    the judgment sought by the victims and their descendants: that the
    mass slayings of up to 1.5 million Armenians be declared a genocide
    carried out by Turkey, which the Turks vehemently deny.

    For Armenia and its diaspora, there is only one way to describe what
    happened - "Mets Eghern," the Great Slaughter.

    Armenians demand that Turkey take responsibility for a
    state-sponsored, premeditated attempt to liquidate this minority
    people in the Ottoman Empire over four years starting in 1915.
    Despite the passing of decades, Armenians say the issue must be
    resolved, and they're pressing the European Union to make Turkey's
    acknowledgment of genocide a condition for EU membership.

    "The first tragedy is when you cause this atrocity. Second is when,
    after 90 years, you don't accept this tragedy," said Nikolai
    Hovhanisian, a scholar at the Armenian Academy of Sciences. "The
    Armenians want their own Nuremberg."

    While some Turks have wavered in their views, officialdom has not.
    Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul has called the genocide charge
    slanderous. And Deniz Baykal, a leading opposition politician, said:
    "We cannot accept these allegations Turkey won't be held responsible
    for something we never did."

    ---

    Armenia once was a vast kingdom, extending from the Black Sea to the
    Caspian, but by 1915 it had been subjugated and divided - parts of it
    absorbed into Russia and others into Ottoman Turkey. As the Ottoman
    Empire disintegrated among the blood and smoke of World War I,
    Turkish nationalism soared and Armenians were regarded as potential
    subversives. The Muslim Ottoman rulers feared the Christian Armenians
    were siding with the Christian Russia of Czar Nicholas II, the enemy
    of German-allied Turkey in the war.

    On April 24, 1915, the Young Turks regime that was in power in
    Ottoman Turkey ordered hundreds of Armenian intellectuals and
    cultural leaders arrested in Constantinople, now Istanbul. Many
    eventually were killed, and Armenians mark the date as Genocide
    Remembrance Day.

    Violence spread through Armenian regions in eastern and southern
    Turkey.

    Musoyan, 12 at the time, recalled that fearful rumors of attack -
    "Those who will cut you will come" - circulated for months in her
    village of Kessab along the Mediterranean coast north of Latakia in
    present-day Syria.

    Finally, soldiers came in the middle of the night, Musoyan said. By
    daybreak, they had gathered some 6,000 Armenian women, children and
    weak or older men and started driving them out of town, "like
    beasts."

    "It was hot, the sun beat down on us, we were thirsty and they gave
    us nothing to drink, we had only the bread we took from home," she
    said.

    "The Turkish soldiers used whips and sabers to beat us. Those who
    were too weak to keep up were killed or left for the dead," she said.

    Musoyan said it took days - maybe a week - for her, her older sister,
    her younger brother and her mother to arrive at the town of Hamah,
    Syria, some 160 kilometers (100 miles) southeast of Kessab.

    Hundreds of thousands of Armenians were driven across the Syrian
    desert to Deir ez-Zor, near the present-day border with Iraq, where
    Armenian activists say many were slain or died of hunger and disease
    in concentration camps.

    Others managed to flee eastward, across the Araxas River into
    Russian-held Armenia.

    Varazdat Harutyunian, 95, says he and his family fled to Echmiadzin,
    the town that is the seat of the Armenian Apostolic Church. He
    remembers an endless procession of burials as thousands of people
    died of cholera and hunger; in a cool basement near the cathedral
    "bodies were stacked like firewood," he said.

    Turkey acknowledges many Armenians were killed, but says the numbers
    are exaggerated and the victims died in civil unrest, not as a result
    of genocide.

    ---

    Huge numbers of Armenians fled to other countries, notably the United
    States, France and Lebanon. But the tragedy of 1915-19 links the
    far-flung diaspora communities and the Armenians still in their
    historic homeland; it is a grim counterpart to the bright pride that
    Armenians take in their unique alphabet, love of literature and
    traditions of hospitality.

    "The memory sits in every Armenian's subconscious," said Sonia
    Mirzonian, vice director of the Armenian National Archives. "If
    you're Armenian, you can immediately see the fear and understanding
    in any other (Armenian) you meet."

    Historian Ashot Melkonian, with the Armenian Academy of Sciences,
    said the genocide is a prism through which the Armenians perceive
    many events. For instance, the devastating 1988 earthquake that
    killed 25,000 Armenians is often described as a genocidal cataclysm,
    he said.

    Armenians largely see the six-year war over the Armenian enclave of
    Nagorno-Karbakh in Azerbaijan as a conceptual extension of Turkish
    genocide, and broadly refer to the Muslim Azeris as "Turks."

    But although the deaths loom large for Armenians, they've received
    comparatively little attention elsewhere. Historical evidence was
    scattered and political considerations may have dampened
    investigative energy.

    The Armenians' tragedy garnered wide attention in Europe and the
    United States in the early 1920s. But it fell from notice as the
    Great Powers redrew the postwar borders of the collapsed Ottoman
    Empire and Russia convulsed in revolution and civil war.

    Following World War II, as Turkey allied itself with the West against
    the Soviet Union, Ankara was able to keep the issue dormant.
    Armenians under Soviet rule could not openly discuss the events until
    1965 when Moscow allowed the construction of a massive granite
    memorial in Yerevan.

    Richard Hovannisian, an Armenian historian at the University of
    California, Los Angeles, called the lack of full understanding of the
    Armenians' plight "amnesia" or the "subversion of memory" - owing to
    the complex politics following World War I and Turkey's keystone
    position in Cold War politics.

    Armenia gained independence in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet
    Union, but the country has long languished due to the loss of
    subsidies from Moscow, the war over Nagorno-Karbakh and the border
    blockade by Turkey - Azerbaijan's ally. Much of Armenia's wealth now
    comes from the support of the diaspora.

    Now, Genocide Remembrance Day is observed annually on April 24 with
    processions and speeches in Armenia and diaspora communities. A
    growing number of countries - including France, Russia and Greece -
    have officially acknowledged the killings as genocide. The United
    States, which has one of the largest populations of expatriate
    Armenians, has not - in large part, Armenians say, because Turkey is
    a vital NATO ally it cannot afford to offend.

    However, some scholars in Turkey and elsewhere say evidence is
    accumulating that supports Armenians' contentions.

    Roger Smith, a genocide scholar and professor emeritus at the College
    of William and Mary in Virginia, said a "convergence of evidence" now
    supports a planned genocide.

    "There is ample documentation of the genocidal intent of the Ottoman
    authorities," agreed Taner Akcam, a Turkish-born history scholar who
    teaches at the University of Minnesota.

    Akcam also said more Turks are coming to re-examine the events 90
    years ago because they've become more interested in their own history
    as a result of growing democratization and freedom of speech.

    "Every day more intellectuals ... publicly deplore the mass killing
    of the Armenians," Akcam said. "People want to know what really
    happened. You cannot suppress this in a continuous way. The Turkish
    people want to know."
Working...
X