Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Nationalist hysteria covers-up US cooperation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Nationalist hysteria covers-up US cooperation

    Turkish Press
    April 29 2005

    Nationalist hysteria covers-up US cooperation

    29/04/2005 Bianet.org

    In spite of discrepancies regarding US occupation of Iraq, Ankara
    inks military agreement of USD 1.1 billion value with Washington for
    upgrading 117 war planes. "Ankara covers up collaboration with the
    aggressor with manipulated nationalism" critics say.

    BIA (Istanbul) - Military agreement with the US of USD 1.1 billion
    dollar value for the modernization of 117 Turkish air force F-16 war
    planes, sparks public debate regarding Turkey's strategic relations.

    Filiz Koçali, head of the Socialist Democracy Party skeptically
    points out the coincidence of the recent surge of nationalist
    hysteria and the military agreements concluded with the US.

    `Whilst public attention was channeled into the ongoing nationalism
    frenzy, first the government decree providing broader US use of the
    southern Incirlik air base is was issued to be followed by the F-16
    upgrading agreement.

    `A mutual trade-off: Bush refrains from pronouncing the word
    `Armenian genocide', and gets Incirlik and 1,1 billion in return'.

    A joint US-Turkish military installation in the Incirlik district of
    the Southern town of Adana, Incirlik air base has been a major US
    facility during the Cold War. Its operation for major military
    undertakings, by a 1979 `Defense and Economic Cooperation Agreement'
    (DECA) between the US and Turkey, is conditioned with special Turkish
    parliament decisions. Turkish parliament in March 2002 refused
    involvement in the US war on Iraq, thus closing Incirlik base for US
    air force flights directed at Iraq.

    A recent Turkish government decree, introducing a more liberal
    interpretation of the DECA, provides legal framework for broader
    usage of the base for US forces operating in Iraq.

    Some analysts, like Koçali, are of the opinion that, the abrupt
    upsurge of nationalist hysteria across the country, particularly
    after official denouncement by Chief of Staff General Hilmi Özkök of
    burning of a Turkish flag during, the Kurdish New Year, Newroz
    celebrations by kids in the Mediterranean port city of Mersin has
    distracted public attention from fundamental issues.

    Military analyst Serdar Sen is of the opinion that the recent
    tightening of ties with the US should be interpreted within the Bush
    government's scheme of `Cooperation for a Mutual Future and Progress
    for the Extended Middle East and the North Africa' (CMFPEMENA).

    Formerly dubbed as `Greater Middle East' project the initiative was
    designated by the Bush government as a reply to the 9/11 events for
    `introducing peace and democracy' to the Muslim world, then
    reassessed to include North Africa as well.

    Meanwhile, Cengiz Aktar an expert on the European Union integration
    process, says that the relations between Turkey and the US cannot be
    viewed in the same context since the beginning of negotiations with
    the European Union for membership.

    Strategic attitudes never changed!

    Recalling that the Turkish Armed Forces' modernization continues for
    some time now, Sen believes that a recent speech by Gen. Özkök at the
    Military Academy provides significant insight for Ankara's attitudes.
    Sen affirms that Turkey assumes a vital role in the `Greater Middle
    East' scheme and the claims that Turkey was giving the cold shoulder
    to the US is nullified with Özkök's latest speech.

    `When we levy the main theme of the speech, we can say that Turkey is
    moving ahead towards globalization through regionalism. This firmly
    fits the US strategy of the Greater Middle East project. The US,
    through this strategy via the military reinvents its historical
    relations with Turkey once more.

    If Turkey is to become the `fairy tale land'...

    For Turkey to become a strong country asserting its might in the
    Middle East and Caucasus, `its military infrastructure must be
    complete and made comprehensive' says Sen, and adds, `If Turkey is
    going to be the fairy tale land anticipated in the project, it will
    require such mighty infantry'.

    Sen points out that CMFPEMENA project is not totally `peaceful', but
    foresees a certain dose of conflict. He views this dose as mostly
    `armed deterrence', but not war. According to Sen's point of view,
    Turkey is the most suitable candidate for warding off possible
    threats in the framework of its new defense plan, which the US
    formulates as a remedy for combating terrorism and security issues.

    Underlining Turkey's role in the process of integrating Syria and
    Iran to the world market, Sen says that `If this course of action
    cannot succeed as planned, the use of force might come into the
    agenda. Hence, the modernization of the Turkish Armed Forces might
    have critical importance in intervening to a possible chaos arising
    in the Caucasus and the Caspian region'.

    There are no problems between the US and Turkey

    The leader of the Socialist Democracy Party (SDP) Filiz Koçali states
    that the `The course of events shows that, just as the Chief of Staff
    Özkök says, we do not have any problems in our relations with the
    United States.

    `First the government decree on Incirlik is issued, and now the F-16
    issue is on the agenda. This is mutual trade-off. In return for
    opting out of saying the word `Armenian genocide', Bush gets Incirlik
    base and 1,1 billion dollars'.

    In Koçali's perspective, Turkey does not stick to peaceful policies
    in neither its domestic nor foreign policy.

    `There are secret agreements between Turkey and the US. For example,
    the Incirlik decree will not be published in the Official Gazette.
    Among the topics these secret handshakes concern, there is not only
    Armenian question, but the Kurdish one as well. We demand such
    clandestine agreements become public'.

    Turkey cannot step back from the EU path

    "The relations between Turkey and the US, which commenced in 1918,
    could not continue along the same trail, as negotiations with the
    European Union began in 1999.

    If Turkey would retain its position a prime US ally, it would not
    have gained the support of the European countries. The EU would not
    tolerate another Britain within its boundaries' analyzes the European
    Union integration process expert Cengiz Aktar.

    Articulating that Turkey must have another look at its foreign policy
    priorities, Aktar appraises that the US is not a country that one can
    ignore. However, Turkey must maintain fine balances between the two
    foremost sources of global power he believes.

    In Aktar's opinion, the new circumstances arising out of Incirlik and
    the modernization of F-16's, are of a `tactical' not a `strategic'
    nature. Turkey does not have strong arguments for shifting towards
    any other target than the European Union membership, he told bianet.

    In reply to the question regarding Turkey' presumed role in the
    Greater Middle East project and prospective increase in its military
    strength, Aktar says: `Could Turkey ever have uphold its political
    and economical stability by such policies in its history? How can it
    do so now? The Turkish Armed Forces and successive governments must
    have realized this reality by now'.

    Arms purchases from Israel

    In the wake of the F-16 modernization agreement of USD 1,1 billion
    dollar value with the US, Turkey is reported to conclude a USD 200
    million dollar accord with Israel for purchasing unmanned war planes.
    The agreement will reportedly be signed by Prime Minister Recep
    Tayyip Erdoğan in May when he pays an official visit to this country.
    (AK/EÜ/EK/SAÖ/YE)

    BIA News Center
Working...
X