Tweet
CICEK UNMOVED ON ARMENIAN CONFERENCE - PART II
Kemal Balcı
The New Anatolian / Ankara
New Anatolian, Turkey
Aug 30 2005
Cicek: My opinion hasn't changed about the Armenian conference.
Justice Ministry's Cicek calls on nationalists to protest against
the conference.
Claiming that irresponsible broadcasts and reports by the media have
provoked social tension based on ethnic discrimination, Cicek said
that the govt has remained silent to prevent such incidents and to
keep them out of the public eye
Justice Minister Cemil Cicek said that he hasn't changed his mind
about the Armenian Conference, postponed in April and now scheduled
for next month bringing the issue to for once more. Cicek remarked
that such a tendentious and a narrow-scoped conference couldn't be of
a scientific approach. The minister is imploring those who deny the
"genocide" to protest against the conference, as well as political
parties and associations with "nationalism" in their names. He also
wants scientists and intellectuals to follow suit. Defending the idea
that irresponsible broadcasts and reports by the media have provoked
social tension over Turkish-Kurdish discrimination, Cicek clarified
why the government has remained silent on these events saying that it's
an attempt to prevent such incidents and to keep them off the agenda.
The justice minister spoke to TNA:
TNA: You protested against the Armenian conference by saying that
it's tendentious and succeeded in postponing it. However now the
conference will be held at the personal request of the premier. What
do you think about what's happened?
CICEK: No, no. I don't ever get involved in disputes with the prime
minister. I'm a man of my word. That conference wasn't aiming
to search for the truth. Now we'll have another opportunity to
see whether it's tendentious or whether it encompasses different
opinions. When the conference was again brought to public attention,
I phoned many people. For instance, I called Yusuf Halacoglu (head of
the Turkish Historical Society, TTK) and he said that he hadn't been
invited. What's this conference supposed to be then? Is a gathering
of those who share the same idea or a search for truth? This is what
I think.
TNA: The government seems to be indulging in a bit of opportunism.
It's trying to use the conference as a platform that could reshape
Turkey's image before Oct. 3.
CICEK: No, no. I'm just giving my opinion and I'll go on talking. The
"genocide" claims will be irresponsibly imposed on this country and
in return no one will have a say. I wonder for how long the public
will go on like this without saying anything. If there are people
who are offended by the so-called Armenian genocide, then they should
say so. I don't think that people have voiced their opinions enough.
TNA: You're calling on the public to protest against the conference.
However, isn't there a chance that you'll provoke them?
CICEK: All of my statements are made within the legal framework.
Everyone should get up and say out loud what they think in a civilized
manner. It's not enough for just one person to voice an opinion on
everyone's behalf. People should voice their opinions within legal
boundaries. I mean, the public shouldn't wait for the justice minister
to lash out.
TNA: Have you ever discussed this issue with Foreign Minister and
Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Gul?
CICEK: No, he issued his own statement. He said that he would attend
the conference if its participation were widened. What he means by
'widened participation' doesn't concern the number of those there but
rather the variety of participants' opinions. Let's see whether or
not different opinions will be represented at the conference. Until
now though there's been no indication of this. Why would this be Cemil
Cicek's issue? There are hundreds of historians and academics in this
country. Everyone should voice their opinions, without affronting
others or proposing illegal activities, to show their sensitivity to
the issue. There are parties and associations which have "nationalist"
phrases in their names and people who have adopted nationalistic
views. They shouldn't take this lying down.
TNA: What do you expect from Oct. 3?
CICEK: We're waiting for the talks to be set out. It's expected to be
a very tough period. If those against Turkey's full European Union
membership come to power then things will be harder than before.
However we've been given a promise by the EU. They go back on their
word. We believe that the accession talks will start.
TNA: If the negotiations don't start, does Turkey have any other
options than the EU?
CICEK: We haven't come to that point yet so it's inappropriate to
comment on it. Otherwise we would be opening the way for those who
are anti-Turkey. We've kept our promises. If they don't keep theirs
then how can they talk about modern values?
TNA: As discussed at the last National Security Council (MGK) meeting,
are you worried about potential threats to our neighbors Iran and
Iraq in the short term?
CICEK: Every development in Iraq already concerns Turkey. Developments
in Iran not only concern Turkey but the whole world, such as the use
of atomic energy. Our desire is to establish peace through meetings
without causing tension. I think this is what globalization means. Even
when you don't have any effect on or have contribution to make to
an issue, the consequences could also affect you. For instance, if
you've predicted that a barrel of petrol will cost a maximum of $40
while drawing up the budget, but it shoots up to $70 a barrel, you
could be negatively affected by the increase in price, especially as
Turkey is a petrol importer. They're our neighbors and developments,
whether good or bad, affect us too. We always hope for the best.
TNA: There's been serious public tension recently. Does it concern you?
CICEK: Even if there is a problem, if you exaggerate it, the problem
will become grow out of proportion. The media has real responsibility
on this issue. If you repeat reports of an event 50 times, exaggerating
them, then people may be provoked. I'm not accusing the media but
they have a big role in raising or lowering tension. If events are
reported on without being exaggerated, then they'll remain local and
the problem can be solved by the security forces. The same scenes of
incidents are broadcast at least 50 times a day on TV programs. There
are some programs that behave irresponsibly. Of course, we [political
figures] have also made some irresponsible statements.
TNA: Don't you think that the government is partly responsible for
some of this? The government gives the impression that it's out of
touch with the public and appears to underestimate incidents based
on ethnic discrimination which are spreading regionally.
CICEK: No, this isn't true. How can you conclude that we haven't
noticed? Asking questions is easy but the answers aren't always
that easy. You can't drive me into a corner with your questions! A
statement such as that, claiming we didn't take heed of incidents,
is all wrong. If you place too much focus on an issue, then you're
leaving the door wide open for an issue to be overexposed. Medical
experts once warned me, while I was preparing an anti-drug campaign,
that if the publicity was overdone then it could backfire and have a
reverse effect. If we discuss this issue too much then we could well
increase the number of such incidents.
--Boundary_(ID_30CYIPqygssSFVJoPCxAew)--
Kemal Balcı
The New Anatolian / Ankara
New Anatolian, Turkey
Aug 30 2005
Cicek: My opinion hasn't changed about the Armenian conference.
Justice Ministry's Cicek calls on nationalists to protest against
the conference.
Claiming that irresponsible broadcasts and reports by the media have
provoked social tension based on ethnic discrimination, Cicek said
that the govt has remained silent to prevent such incidents and to
keep them out of the public eye
Justice Minister Cemil Cicek said that he hasn't changed his mind
about the Armenian Conference, postponed in April and now scheduled
for next month bringing the issue to for once more. Cicek remarked
that such a tendentious and a narrow-scoped conference couldn't be of
a scientific approach. The minister is imploring those who deny the
"genocide" to protest against the conference, as well as political
parties and associations with "nationalism" in their names. He also
wants scientists and intellectuals to follow suit. Defending the idea
that irresponsible broadcasts and reports by the media have provoked
social tension over Turkish-Kurdish discrimination, Cicek clarified
why the government has remained silent on these events saying that it's
an attempt to prevent such incidents and to keep them off the agenda.
The justice minister spoke to TNA:
TNA: You protested against the Armenian conference by saying that
it's tendentious and succeeded in postponing it. However now the
conference will be held at the personal request of the premier. What
do you think about what's happened?
CICEK: No, no. I don't ever get involved in disputes with the prime
minister. I'm a man of my word. That conference wasn't aiming
to search for the truth. Now we'll have another opportunity to
see whether it's tendentious or whether it encompasses different
opinions. When the conference was again brought to public attention,
I phoned many people. For instance, I called Yusuf Halacoglu (head of
the Turkish Historical Society, TTK) and he said that he hadn't been
invited. What's this conference supposed to be then? Is a gathering
of those who share the same idea or a search for truth? This is what
I think.
TNA: The government seems to be indulging in a bit of opportunism.
It's trying to use the conference as a platform that could reshape
Turkey's image before Oct. 3.
CICEK: No, no. I'm just giving my opinion and I'll go on talking. The
"genocide" claims will be irresponsibly imposed on this country and
in return no one will have a say. I wonder for how long the public
will go on like this without saying anything. If there are people
who are offended by the so-called Armenian genocide, then they should
say so. I don't think that people have voiced their opinions enough.
TNA: You're calling on the public to protest against the conference.
However, isn't there a chance that you'll provoke them?
CICEK: All of my statements are made within the legal framework.
Everyone should get up and say out loud what they think in a civilized
manner. It's not enough for just one person to voice an opinion on
everyone's behalf. People should voice their opinions within legal
boundaries. I mean, the public shouldn't wait for the justice minister
to lash out.
TNA: Have you ever discussed this issue with Foreign Minister and
Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Gul?
CICEK: No, he issued his own statement. He said that he would attend
the conference if its participation were widened. What he means by
'widened participation' doesn't concern the number of those there but
rather the variety of participants' opinions. Let's see whether or
not different opinions will be represented at the conference. Until
now though there's been no indication of this. Why would this be Cemil
Cicek's issue? There are hundreds of historians and academics in this
country. Everyone should voice their opinions, without affronting
others or proposing illegal activities, to show their sensitivity to
the issue. There are parties and associations which have "nationalist"
phrases in their names and people who have adopted nationalistic
views. They shouldn't take this lying down.
TNA: What do you expect from Oct. 3?
CICEK: We're waiting for the talks to be set out. It's expected to be
a very tough period. If those against Turkey's full European Union
membership come to power then things will be harder than before.
However we've been given a promise by the EU. They go back on their
word. We believe that the accession talks will start.
TNA: If the negotiations don't start, does Turkey have any other
options than the EU?
CICEK: We haven't come to that point yet so it's inappropriate to
comment on it. Otherwise we would be opening the way for those who
are anti-Turkey. We've kept our promises. If they don't keep theirs
then how can they talk about modern values?
TNA: As discussed at the last National Security Council (MGK) meeting,
are you worried about potential threats to our neighbors Iran and
Iraq in the short term?
CICEK: Every development in Iraq already concerns Turkey. Developments
in Iran not only concern Turkey but the whole world, such as the use
of atomic energy. Our desire is to establish peace through meetings
without causing tension. I think this is what globalization means. Even
when you don't have any effect on or have contribution to make to
an issue, the consequences could also affect you. For instance, if
you've predicted that a barrel of petrol will cost a maximum of $40
while drawing up the budget, but it shoots up to $70 a barrel, you
could be negatively affected by the increase in price, especially as
Turkey is a petrol importer. They're our neighbors and developments,
whether good or bad, affect us too. We always hope for the best.
TNA: There's been serious public tension recently. Does it concern you?
CICEK: Even if there is a problem, if you exaggerate it, the problem
will become grow out of proportion. The media has real responsibility
on this issue. If you repeat reports of an event 50 times, exaggerating
them, then people may be provoked. I'm not accusing the media but
they have a big role in raising or lowering tension. If events are
reported on without being exaggerated, then they'll remain local and
the problem can be solved by the security forces. The same scenes of
incidents are broadcast at least 50 times a day on TV programs. There
are some programs that behave irresponsibly. Of course, we [political
figures] have also made some irresponsible statements.
TNA: Don't you think that the government is partly responsible for
some of this? The government gives the impression that it's out of
touch with the public and appears to underestimate incidents based
on ethnic discrimination which are spreading regionally.
CICEK: No, this isn't true. How can you conclude that we haven't
noticed? Asking questions is easy but the answers aren't always
that easy. You can't drive me into a corner with your questions! A
statement such as that, claiming we didn't take heed of incidents,
is all wrong. If you place too much focus on an issue, then you're
leaving the door wide open for an issue to be overexposed. Medical
experts once warned me, while I was preparing an anti-drug campaign,
that if the publicity was overdone then it could backfire and have a
reverse effect. If we discuss this issue too much then we could well
increase the number of such incidents.
--Boundary_(ID_30CYIPqygssSFVJoPCxAew)--