Tweet
The New York Times
February 23, 2005 Wednesday
Late Edition - Final
The Secret Genocide Archive
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF.
Photos don't normally appear on this page. But it's time for all of
us to look squarely at the victims of our indifference.
These are just four photos in a secret archive of thousands of photos
and reports that document the genocide under way in Darfur. The
materials were gathered by African Union monitors, who are just about
the only people able to travel widely in that part of Sudan.
This African Union archive is classified, but it was shared with me
by someone who believes that Americans will be stirred if they can
see the consequences of their complacency.
The photo at the upper left was taken in the village of Hamada on
Jan. 15, right after a Sudanese government-backed militia, the
janjaweed, attacked it and killed 107 people. One of them was this
little boy. I'm not showing the photo of his older brother, about 5
years old, who lay beside him because the brother had been beaten so
badly that nothing was left of his face. And alongside the two boys
was the corpse of their mother.
The photo to the right shows the corpse of a man with an injured leg
who was apparently unable to run away when the janjaweed militia
attacked.
At the lower left is a man who fled barefoot and almost made it to
this bush before he was shot dead.
Last is the skeleton of a man or woman whose wrists are still bound.
The attackers pulled the person's clothes down to the knees,
presumably so the victim could be sexually abused before being
killed. If the victim was a man, he was probably castrated; if a
woman, she was probably raped.
There are thousands more of these photos. Many of them show attacks
on children and are too horrific for a newspaper.
One wrenching photo in the archive shows the manacled hands of a
teenager from the girls' school in Suleia who was burned alive. It's
been common for the Sudanese militias to gang-rape teenage girls and
then mutilate or kill them.
Another photo shows the body of a young girl, perhaps 10 years old,
staring up from the ground where she was killed. Still another shows
a man who was castrated and shot in the head.
This archive, including scores of reports by the monitors on the
scene, underscores that this slaughter is waged by and with the
support of the Sudanese government as it tries to clear the area of
non-Arabs. Many of the photos show men in Sudanese Army uniforms
pillaging and burning African villages. I hope the African Union will
open its archive to demonstrate publicly just what is going on in
Darfur.
The archive also includes an extraordinary document seized from a
janjaweed official that apparently outlines genocidal policies. Dated
last August, the document calls for the ''execution of all directives
from the president of the republic'' and is directed to regional
commanders and security officials.
''Change the demography of Darfur and make it void of African
tribes,'' the document urges. It encourages ''killing, burning
villages and farms, terrorizing people, confiscating property from
members of African tribes and forcing them from Darfur.''
It's worth being skeptical of any document because forgeries are
possible. But the African Union believes this document to be
authentic. I also consulted a variety of experts on Sudan and shared
it with some of them, and the consensus was that it appears to be
real.
Certainly there's no doubt about the slaughter, although the numbers
are fuzzy. A figure of 70,000 is sometimes stated as an estimated
death toll, but that is simply a U.N. estimate for the deaths in one
seven-month period from nonviolent causes. It's hard to know the
total mortality over two years of genocide, partly because the
Sudanese government is blocking a U.N. team from going to Darfur and
making such an estimate. But independent estimates exceed 220,000 --
and the number is rising by about 10,000 per month.
So what can stop this genocide? At one level the answer is technical:
sanctions against Sudan, a no-fly zone, a freeze of Sudanese
officials' assets, prosecution of the killers by the International
Criminal Court, a team effort by African and Arab countries to
pressure Sudan, and an international force of African troops with
financing and logistical support from the West.
But that's the narrow answer. What will really stop this genocide is
indignation. Senator Paul Simon, who died in 2003, said after the
Rwandan genocide, ''If every member of the House and Senate had
received 100 letters from people back home saying we have to do
something about Rwanda, when the crisis was first developing, then I
think the response would have been different.''
The same is true this time. Web sites like www.darfurgenocide.org and
www.savedarfur.org are trying to galvanize Americans, but the
response has been pathetic.
I'm sorry for inflicting these horrific photos on you. But the real
obscenity isn't in printing pictures of dead babies -- it's in our
passivity, which allows these people to be slaughtered.
During past genocides against Armenians, Jews and Cambodians, it was
possible to claim that we didn't fully know what was going on. This
time, President Bush, Congress and the European Parliament have
already declared genocide to be under way. And we have photos.
This time, we have no excuse.
February 23, 2005 Wednesday
Late Edition - Final
The Secret Genocide Archive
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF.
Photos don't normally appear on this page. But it's time for all of
us to look squarely at the victims of our indifference.
These are just four photos in a secret archive of thousands of photos
and reports that document the genocide under way in Darfur. The
materials were gathered by African Union monitors, who are just about
the only people able to travel widely in that part of Sudan.
This African Union archive is classified, but it was shared with me
by someone who believes that Americans will be stirred if they can
see the consequences of their complacency.
The photo at the upper left was taken in the village of Hamada on
Jan. 15, right after a Sudanese government-backed militia, the
janjaweed, attacked it and killed 107 people. One of them was this
little boy. I'm not showing the photo of his older brother, about 5
years old, who lay beside him because the brother had been beaten so
badly that nothing was left of his face. And alongside the two boys
was the corpse of their mother.
The photo to the right shows the corpse of a man with an injured leg
who was apparently unable to run away when the janjaweed militia
attacked.
At the lower left is a man who fled barefoot and almost made it to
this bush before he was shot dead.
Last is the skeleton of a man or woman whose wrists are still bound.
The attackers pulled the person's clothes down to the knees,
presumably so the victim could be sexually abused before being
killed. If the victim was a man, he was probably castrated; if a
woman, she was probably raped.
There are thousands more of these photos. Many of them show attacks
on children and are too horrific for a newspaper.
One wrenching photo in the archive shows the manacled hands of a
teenager from the girls' school in Suleia who was burned alive. It's
been common for the Sudanese militias to gang-rape teenage girls and
then mutilate or kill them.
Another photo shows the body of a young girl, perhaps 10 years old,
staring up from the ground where she was killed. Still another shows
a man who was castrated and shot in the head.
This archive, including scores of reports by the monitors on the
scene, underscores that this slaughter is waged by and with the
support of the Sudanese government as it tries to clear the area of
non-Arabs. Many of the photos show men in Sudanese Army uniforms
pillaging and burning African villages. I hope the African Union will
open its archive to demonstrate publicly just what is going on in
Darfur.
The archive also includes an extraordinary document seized from a
janjaweed official that apparently outlines genocidal policies. Dated
last August, the document calls for the ''execution of all directives
from the president of the republic'' and is directed to regional
commanders and security officials.
''Change the demography of Darfur and make it void of African
tribes,'' the document urges. It encourages ''killing, burning
villages and farms, terrorizing people, confiscating property from
members of African tribes and forcing them from Darfur.''
It's worth being skeptical of any document because forgeries are
possible. But the African Union believes this document to be
authentic. I also consulted a variety of experts on Sudan and shared
it with some of them, and the consensus was that it appears to be
real.
Certainly there's no doubt about the slaughter, although the numbers
are fuzzy. A figure of 70,000 is sometimes stated as an estimated
death toll, but that is simply a U.N. estimate for the deaths in one
seven-month period from nonviolent causes. It's hard to know the
total mortality over two years of genocide, partly because the
Sudanese government is blocking a U.N. team from going to Darfur and
making such an estimate. But independent estimates exceed 220,000 --
and the number is rising by about 10,000 per month.
So what can stop this genocide? At one level the answer is technical:
sanctions against Sudan, a no-fly zone, a freeze of Sudanese
officials' assets, prosecution of the killers by the International
Criminal Court, a team effort by African and Arab countries to
pressure Sudan, and an international force of African troops with
financing and logistical support from the West.
But that's the narrow answer. What will really stop this genocide is
indignation. Senator Paul Simon, who died in 2003, said after the
Rwandan genocide, ''If every member of the House and Senate had
received 100 letters from people back home saying we have to do
something about Rwanda, when the crisis was first developing, then I
think the response would have been different.''
The same is true this time. Web sites like www.darfurgenocide.org and
www.savedarfur.org are trying to galvanize Americans, but the
response has been pathetic.
I'm sorry for inflicting these horrific photos on you. But the real
obscenity isn't in printing pictures of dead babies -- it's in our
passivity, which allows these people to be slaughtered.
During past genocides against Armenians, Jews and Cambodians, it was
possible to claim that we didn't fully know what was going on. This
time, President Bush, Congress and the European Parliament have
already declared genocide to be under way. And we have photos.
This time, we have no excuse.