PROPAGANDA IN AZERI MASS MEDIA HAS SYSTEM NATURE, IT IS CHAOTIC IN ARMENIAN MASS MEDIA
YEREVAN, JULY 19. ARMINFO. Negative statements and expressions
concerning Armenia in Azeri mass media exceed four times than
in Armenian mass media concerning Azerbaijan, data of mass media
monitoring prove. Chairman of the Yerevan press-club Boris Navasardyan
says that one can see in Azeri mass media the "enemy" term concerning
neutral subjects, which cannot by military, "enemy football team",
"enemy newspaper", etc. Besides, Azeri newspapers actively use inverted
commas concerning NKR's political institutions.
According to observers, stereotypes in Armenian press rather show
moods of Armenian journalists or editors of one or another mass media,
than the coordinated propaganda of authorities.
Navasardyan noted that mass cases of misinformation have been
registered from both parties. He expressed regret for absence of
transformation of frames of mind in Armenian press. Armenian-Azeri
relations in Armenian press are covered through the stereotype of
Turks' and Azeris' animosity.
Monitoring of mass media was crossed: Georgian and Azeri colleagues
of Navasardyan studied Armenian mass media. In Navasardyan's opinion,
negative influence of mass media in Transcaucasian republics upon
frames of mind is explained by that information subjects had been
formed not under the market's but political field's impact there. Thus,
according to the monitoring group, propaganda but not information is
the main function of mass media.
YEREVAN, JULY 19. ARMINFO. Negative statements and expressions
concerning Armenia in Azeri mass media exceed four times than
in Armenian mass media concerning Azerbaijan, data of mass media
monitoring prove. Chairman of the Yerevan press-club Boris Navasardyan
says that one can see in Azeri mass media the "enemy" term concerning
neutral subjects, which cannot by military, "enemy football team",
"enemy newspaper", etc. Besides, Azeri newspapers actively use inverted
commas concerning NKR's political institutions.
According to observers, stereotypes in Armenian press rather show
moods of Armenian journalists or editors of one or another mass media,
than the coordinated propaganda of authorities.
Navasardyan noted that mass cases of misinformation have been
registered from both parties. He expressed regret for absence of
transformation of frames of mind in Armenian press. Armenian-Azeri
relations in Armenian press are covered through the stereotype of
Turks' and Azeris' animosity.
Monitoring of mass media was crossed: Georgian and Azeri colleagues
of Navasardyan studied Armenian mass media. In Navasardyan's opinion,
negative influence of mass media in Transcaucasian republics upon
frames of mind is explained by that information subjects had been
formed not under the market's but political field's impact there. Thus,
according to the monitoring group, propaganda but not information is
the main function of mass media.