Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

F18News Summary: Eastern Europe; Kazakhstan; Ukraine; Uzbekistan;

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • F18News Summary: Eastern Europe; Kazakhstan; Ukraine; Uzbekistan;

    FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway
    http://www.forum18.org/

    The right to believe, to worship and witness
    The right to change one's belief or religion
    The right to join together and express one's belief

    =================================================

    1 June 2005
    EASTERN EUROPE: OSCE CONFERENCE ON INTOLERANCE REGIONAL SURVEY
    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=574
    As delegates prepare for the forthcoming OSCE Conference on Anti-Semitism
    and on Other Forms of Intolerance, Forum 18 News Service notes that
    religious believers face intolerance in the form of attacks on their
    internationally agreed rights to religious freedom - mainly from their
    governments - in many countries of the 55-member OSCE. Despite binding
    OSCE commitments to religious freedom, in some OSCE member states
    religious communities are still being vilified, fined and imprisoned for
    peaceful exercise of their faith, religious services are being broken up,
    places of worship confiscated and even destroyed, religious literature
    censored and religious communities denied state registration and hence the
    domestic legal right to exist. Events in Uzbekistan offer one warning of
    what the persistent intolerance of religious freedom and other
    internationally agreed human rights can lead to.
    * See full article below. *


    30 May 2005
    KAZAKHSTAN: OFFICIALS ENFORCING RELIGION LAW BEFORE IT IS PASSED
    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=572
    The harsh new religion law has not yet been passed, but the authorities
    are already behaving as if it is law Forum 18 News Service has found.
    Religious communities do not yet need state registration - a requirement
    imposed by the new law. But a Protestant church in the Caspian Sea port of
    Aytrau is the latest religious community to be attacked because it does not
    have registration. Diyaz Sultanov, the prosecutor's assistant, told Forum
    18 that "it is impermissible for a church to operate without
    registration." Another proposal put forward - but then apparently
    withdrawn - allowed religious communities to be closed without a court
    hearing. New Life Protestant Church, close to Almaty, has been "banned" by
    local administration chief Raspek Tolbayev, who told Forum 18 that "I will
    take the decision whether or not to open the church." Parliamentary
    deputies Forum 18 has spoken to described the new law as a weapon against
    the "ideological diversity" of the West.


    30 May 2005
    UKRAINE: PEOPLE BARRED ENTRY ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS NOW FREE TO APPEAL
    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=573
    In a new move, the SBU security police has told Forum 18 News Service that
    people barred entry by other CIS countries - including Russia - on
    religious and other grounds can now appeal against any visa bar to
    Ukraine. Appeals can be made either to the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry or
    the SBU, Forum 18 was told. The move follows the ending of an entry ban
    against Japanese Buddhist monk Junsei Teresawa. The SBU refused to tell
    Forum 18 why Teresawa had originally been denied entry, but insisted it
    was not for religious reasons and denied that there is a religious
    category for blacklisting. Not every religious figure blacklisted by
    Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan has been barred from Ukraine and
    Latvian-based Pastor Aleksei Ledyayev - barred by Russia, Belarus and
    Kazakhstan - is now in Ukraine. One of the most prominent recent deportees
    from Russia was Catholic Bishop Jerzy Mazur, a Polish citizen, but the SBU
    told Forum 18 that "no-one with the surname Mazur is on the Ukrainian
    blacklist".


    2 June 2005
    UZBEKISTAN: PROTESTANTS IN NORTH-WEST "ILLEGAL"
    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=575
    The last legal Protestant church in north-west Uzbekistan has been closed
    by the Karakalpakstan region's Justice Ministry, Forum 18 News Service has
    learnt. As all unregistered religious activity in Uzbekistan is illegal,
    the church cannot now legally operate. Klara Alasheva, first deputy
    Justice Minister, denied that her ministry's closure of the church was
    persecution of the Protestant minority. "We warned the church last year
    not to conduct missionary activity but they carried on regardless," she
    told Forum 18. Alasheva also denied that Uzbekistan's ban on missionary
    activity violated its international human rights commitments. "That's what
    you're claiming, but we're legal specialists," she told Forum 18. The
    authorities in north-west Uzbekistan have long conducted an anti-Christian
    campaign, but Protestants in the region are known to still be active.
    Catholic sources have denied a claim by Alasheva that there is a
    registered Catholic parish in Nukus.


    1 June 2005
    EASTERN EUROPE: OSCE CONFERENCE ON INTOLERANCE REGIONAL SURVEY

    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=574
    By Felix Corley, Editor, Forum 18 News Service

    The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), which has
    as members all the states of Europe, Central Asia and North America, works
    not by coercion but by consensus and persuasion. Membership is not
    compulsory: states have the free choice whether to accept the binding OSCE
    commitments by joining or not. The commitment of all OSCE states to respect
    freedom of of thought, conscience, religion or belief is clear and has been
    repeatedly reaffirmed. One of the most important sets of human rights
    commitments that members states have agreed to are the 'Copenhagen
    Commitments,' which, amongst other things, state that:

    "Everyone will have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
    religion. This right includes freedom to change one's religion or belief
    and freedom to manifest one's religion or belief, either alone or in
    community with others, in public or in private, through worship, teaching,
    practice and observance. The exercise of these rights may be subject only
    to such restrictions as are prescribed by law and are consistent with
    international standards."

    Yet government intolerance against religious believers, through denial of
    their rights to religious freedom - rights agreed to by these same
    governments - remains disturbingly pervasive throughout many member
    countries of the OSCE.

    As delegates assemble in Cordoba in Spain for the OSCE Conference on
    Anti-Semitism and on Other Forms of Intolerance on 8 and 9 June, many ask
    how violators of these fundamental OSCE commitments - especially
    Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, Azerbaijan and Armenia - can be allowed
    to continue as members of an organisation whose fundamental principles they
    blatantly flout. OSCE officials argue off the record that it is better to
    keep violators in, with the hope that they can be persuaded to mend their
    ways, rather than expel them, abandoning local people to the clutches of
    their governments. The result is that persecuted believers Forum 18 News
    Service www.forum18.org has spoken to in a number of states now have
    little faith in what the OSCE can and will do for them to protect their
    right to religious freedom.

    The OSCE has reaffirmed that intolerance of and discrimination against
    religious believers is as unacceptable as intolerance of and
    discrimination against ethnic or other social groups or individuals.
    Meeting in the Dutch city of Maastricht in 2003, the OSCE Ministerial
    Council stressed in its Decision No. 4 on Tolerance and Non-Discrimination
    that it

    "[a]ffirms the importance of freedom of thought, conscience, religion or
    belief, and condemns all discrimination and violence, including against
    any religious group or individual believer"

    and "[c]ommits to ensure and facilitate the freedom of the individual to
    profess and practice a religion or belief, alone or in community with
    others, where necessary through transparent and non-discriminatory laws,
    regulations, practices and policies".

    The ministerial council also emphasised what it believed is the importance
    of a "continued and strengthened interfaith and intercultural dialogue to
    promote greater tolerance, respect and mutual understanding".

    But in much of the OSCE region the most serious discrimination and
    intolerance against religious believers of all faiths comes from
    governments themselves. In many states discrimination is enshrined in law
    and in official practice (from national to local level). Believers will
    only be free of such discrimination if such discriminatory laws are
    abolished or amended, and if other laws and international commitments
    guaranteeing religious freedom are put into actual practice.

    Social intolerance of religious minorities does exist - for example among
    Orthodox in Georgia, among Muslims in Central Asia, and among ethnic
    Albanians (whether Muslim or Catholic) in Kosovo. Governments clearly have
    a duty to address this and promote tolerance in society, and many claim to
    do so. But the claims of some governments to be against intolerance are
    rendered worthless by their persistent, repeated failure to either improve
    their own behaviour towards their own citizens, or to honour the
    international commitments they have freely chosen to abide by.

    In considering religious intolerance and hatred, it is important to
    remember that criticising the beliefs of religious or non-religious
    people, whether from a religious or non-religious perspective, does not of
    itself constitute religious hatred. This can only reasonably be said to
    exist where violence is incited leading to acts of violence being
    committed. An absolutely vital element of religious freedom is the right
    peacefully to expound and promote one's own beliefs, including setting out
    how they differ from the beliefs of others, as well as why one believes
    ones own beliefs to be truer than other beliefs.

    In the run-up to the September 2004 OSCE Conference on Tolerance and the
    Fight against Racism, Xenophobia and Discrimination in Brussels, Forum 18
    News Service www.forum18.org surveyed some, but not all, of the continuing
    abuses of religious freedom in the eastern half of the OSCE region (see
    F18News 9 September 2004
    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=407). Discrimination against
    believers also occurs in other OSCE countries (such as the About-Picard law
    in France, restrictions on newer religious communities in Belgium and
    discrimination against minority faiths in Turkey). It is disturbing that
    nearly one year on, almost all the abuses Forum 18 noted in 2004 have
    continued unchecked. Current abuses are outlined thematically below. The
    situations and incidents given are examples and not a comprehensive list
    of religious freedom violations.

    RELIGIOUS WORSHIP: An alarming number of states raid religious meetings to
    close down services and punish those who take part. Uzbekistan is one of
    the worst offenders: unregistered religious services and meetings are
    often raided and participants beaten and fined. Christian bible study
    groups - and small meetings of other faiths - in homes are illegal.
    Large-scale co-ordinated raids took place against Jehovah's Witnesses
    worshipping in April. Islam remains under very tight government control.
    Despite allowing some religious minority communities to register over the
    past year, Turkmenistan restricts the freedom to conduct religious worship
    and meetings - they remain banned in private homes. Even registered
    religious communities - such as the Hare Krishna community in Ashgabad -
    has been banned from meeting, while the Seventh-day Adventists could not
    meet legally for six months after gaining registration. Religious
    communities are pressured to venerate the president's book, Ruhnama,
    despite the fact that many religious believers consider it to be
    blasphemous. Belarus specifically bans unregistered religious services,
    while numerous Protestant congregations - some numbering more than a
    thousand members - cannot meet because they cannot get a registered place
    to worship. In Kazakhstan the new national security amendments now
    completing passage through parliament will similarly ban unregistered
    religious services (administrative fines have already been imposed for
    this). Azerbaijan also on occasion raids places where worship is being
    conducted, either in religious buildings or private homes. In Macedonia,
    members of the Serbian Orthodox Church have difficulty holding public
    worship and leaders have been prosecuted. In Russia and some other states,
    minority faiths are often denied permission to rent publicly-owned
    buildings available to other groups.

    PLACES OF WORSHIP: Opening a place of worship can be impossible in some
    states. Turkmenistan is the worst offender: not only is it almost
    impossible to open a place of worship for non-Muslim and non-Russian
    Orthodox communities, those that existed before harsh new regulations came
    in from the mid-1990s saw those places of worship confiscated, while Hare
    Krishna, Muslim and Adventist places of worship were even bulldozed. More
    than half a dozen mosques were destroyed in 2004. Uzbekistan has closed
    down thousands of mosques since 1996 and often denies Christian groups'
    requests to open churches. Azerbaijan obstructs the opening of Christian
    churches and tries to close down some of those already open, while in 2004
    it seized a mosque in Baku from its community and tried to prevent the
    community meeting elsewhere. Belarus makes it almost impossible for
    religious communities without their own building already - or substantial
    funds to rent one - to find a legal place to worship. An Autocephalous
    Orthodox church (which attracted the anger of the government and the
    Russian Orthodox Church) was bulldozed in 2002. In Slovenia, which
    presently chairs the OSCE, the Ljubljana authorities have long obstructed
    the building of a mosque, as have the authorities in the Slovak capital
    Bratislava. In Bulgaria, in July 2004 the police stormed more than 200
    churches used by the Alternative Synod since a split in the Orthodox
    Church a decade ago, ousting the occupants and handing the churches over
    to the rival Orthodox Patriarchate without any court rulings.

    REGISTRATION: Where registration is compulsory before any religious
    activity can start (Turkmenistan, Belarus and Uzbekistan, with Kazakhstan
    likely to follow soon) or where officials claim that it is (Azerbaijan),
    life is made difficult for communities that either choose not to register
    (such as one network of Baptist communities in the former Soviet
    republics) or are denied registration (the majority of religious
    communities in Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan). Registration in Turkmenistan
    is all but impossible, despite the reduction in 2004 from 500 to 5 in the
    number of adult citizens required to found a community. In countries such
    as Azerbaijan or Uzbekistan, registration for disfavoured communities is
    often made impossible - officials in the sanitary/epidemiological service
    are among those with the power of veto in Uzbekistan. Belarus, Moldova,
    Slovenia, Slovakia, Macedonia, Russia and Latvia are also among states
    which to widely varying degrees make registration of some groups
    impossible or very difficult. Moscow has refused to register the Jehovah's
    Witnesses in the city, despite their national registration. Some countries
    - including the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria, with plans for
    similar moves in Serbia - grant full status as religious communities to
    favoured religious communities only. Faiths with smaller membership or
    which the government does not like have to make do with lesser status and
    fewer rights.

    RELIGIOUS LITERATURE: Belarus and Azerbaijan require compulsory prior
    censorship of all religious literature produced or imported into the
    country. Azerbaijani customs routinely confiscate religious literature,
    releasing it only when the State Committee for Work with Religious
    Organisations grants explicit written approval for each title and the
    number of copies authorised. Forbidden books are sent back or destroyed
    (thousands of Hare Krishna books held by customs for seven years have been
    destroyed). Even countries without formal religious censorship - eg.
    Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan - routinely confiscate imported religious
    literature or literature found during raids on homes. Uzbekistan has burnt
    copies of the Bible confiscated as travellers arrive in the country.
    Uzbekistan routinely bars access to websites it dislikes, such as foreign
    Muslim sites.

    INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: Believers from minority religious communities in
    institutions such as prisons, hospitals or the army may face difficulties
    obtaining and keeping religious literature, praying in private and
    receiving visits from spiritual leaders and fellow-believers. In
    Uzbekistan, even Muslim prisoners have been punished for praying and
    fasting during Ramadan. Death-row prisoners wanting visits from Muslim
    imams and Russian Orthodox priests have had requests denied, even for
    final confession before execution. In Kazakhstan, Protestant
    schoolchildren under 18 are denied their right to worship and their
    parents are denied the right to bring their children up in their own
    faith.

    DISCRIMINATION: Turkmenistan has dismissed from state jobs hundreds of
    active Protestants, Jehovah's Witnesses and members of other religious
    minorities. Turkmen, Azeri, Kazakh and Uzbek officials try to persuade
    people to abandon their faith and "return" to their ancestral faith
    (Islam). Although the order has now reportedly been rescinded, Armenia
    ordered local police chiefs to persuade police officers who were members
    of faiths other than the Armenian Apostolic Church to abandon their faith.
    If persuasion failed, such employees were to be sacked. Belarus has
    subjected leaders of independent Orthodox Churches and Hindus to pressure
    - including fines, threats and inducements - to abandon their faith or
    emigrate. Officials in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus and Macedonia
    repeatedly attack disfavoured religious minorities in the media, insulting
    their beliefs, accusing them falsely of illegal or "destructive"
    activities, as well as inciting popular hostility to them.

    RELIGIOUS SCHOOL CLASSES: Some states have allowed the dominant faith to
    determine the content of compulsory religious education classes and
    textbooks in state-run schools. In Belarus, minority faiths complain their
    beliefs are inaccurately and insultingly presented. In Georgia, classes
    often became denominational Orthodox instruction, with teachers taking
    children to pray in the local Orthodox church. In Russia, Old Believers
    and Protestants have complained of the way religious history is presented
    in Foundations of Orthodox Culture classes which have been partially
    introduced in schools.

    GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE: Many governments meddle in the internal affairs
    of religious communities. Central Asian governments insist on choosing
    national and local Muslim leaders. Turkmenistan ousted successive chief
    muftis in January 2003 and August 2004. Turkmenistan imposes the
    president's book Ruhnama on religious communities, while Uzbekistan allows
    imams at Friday prayers only to deliver officially-produced addresses and
    maintains almost total control of Islamic religious education. Tajikistan
    has conducted "attestation tests" of imams, ousting those who failed.
    Islamic schools are tightly controlled (in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan,
    schools have either been closed or access to them restricted).
    Turkmenistan obstructs those seeking religious education abroad. Some
    countries with large Orthodox communities (but not Russia or Ukraine), try
    to bolster the largest Orthodox Church and obstruct rival jurisdictions
    (Belarus, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Georgia, Moldova). Russia has prevented
    communities from choosing their leadership, expelling a Catholic bishop
    and several priests, a Lutheran bishop, and dozens of Protestant and other
    leaders, while the security service tried to influence the choice of a new
    Old Believer leader in February 2004.

    PROTECTION FROM VIOLENCE: Law enforcement agencies fail to give religious
    minorities the same protection as major groups. Between 1999 and 2003,
    Georgia suffered a wave of violence by self-appointed Orthodox vigilantes,
    with over 100 attacks on True Orthodox, Catholics, Baptists, Pentecostals
    and Jehovah's Witnesses in which believers were physically attacked,
    places of worship blockaded and religious events disrupted. Mob protests
    against religious minorities still continue. The authorities - who know
    the attackers' identity - have punished only a handful of people with
    relatively light sentences. In some cases, police cooperated with attacks
    or failed to investigate them. In Kosovo the Nato-led peacekeeping force
    and United Nations police have repeatedly failed to protect Serbian
    Orthodox churches in use and graveyards, especially during the upsurge in
    anti-Serb violence in March 2004, when some 30 Orthodox sites were
    destroyed or heavily damaged. Few attackers have been arrested or
    prosecuted.

    DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MIGRANTS: Many religion laws restrict the rights of
    legal residents who are not citizens, requiring founders and leaders of
    religious organisations to be citizens. Azerbaijan provides for
    deportation of foreigners and those without citizenship who have conducted
    "religious propaganda", while Kazakhstan's new national security laws
    tighten restrictions on foreign "missionaries". In the past decade,
    Turkmenistan has deported hundreds of legally-resident foreigners known to
    have taken part in religious activity, especially Muslims and Protestants.
    Some states (including Russia and Belarus) have denied visas to foreign
    religious leaders chosen by local religious communities, while others such
    as Kazakhstan have banned short-term visitors invited by local
    communities.

    LACK OF TRANSPARENCY: Major laws and decrees affecting religious life are
    drawn up without public knowledge or discussion. Examples are the
    restrictive laws on religion of Belarus and Bulgaria in 2002, new national
    security amendments in Kazakhstan in 2005 which will add harsh restrictions
    to the religion law, and planned new laws in Georgia, Serbia, Azerbaijan
    and Moldova. International organisations, such as the OSCE or the Council
    of Europe may be consulted but governments often refuse to allow their
    comments to be published or ignore them (as, most recently, in
    Kazakhstan). Many countries retain openly partisan and secretive
    government religious affairs offices. Between 1999 and 2003, Slovenia's
    religious affairs office refused to register any new religious
    communities. Azerbaijan's has stated which communities it will refuse to
    register and what changes other communities will have to make to their
    statutes and activities to gain registration. For many years Armenia
    refused to register the Jehovah's Witnesses, while Moldova still refuses
    to register Muslim and True Orthodox communities.

    RELIGIOUS NGOs: Non-governmental organisations which touch on religion are
    often treated with suspicion and can be denied legal status. Azerbaijan has
    persistently refused registration to the local affiliate of the
    International Religious Liberty Association (IRLA), local religious
    freedom group Devamm and Religion and Democracy, a group of intellectuals
    interested in religion. Even NGOs conducting religious surveys of the
    population are harassed. Religious charities are regarded with suspicion
    across the region, especially in Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.
    In most countries religious communities and their leaders are banned from
    taking part in political activities and religiously-affiliated political
    parties are banned.

    RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORTING: Those reporting on religious freedom such as
    Forum 18 News Service www.forum18.org and groups campaigning on the issue
    face lack of cooperation, obstruction and harassment. Those suspected of
    passing on news of violations have been threatened in Turkmenistan,
    Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan, with the aim of forcing silence. In a region
    without much government transparency or a genuinely free media, officials
    involved in harassing religious communities often refuse to explain to
    journalists what they have done and why. Local religious freedom
    campaigning groups are denied registration or kept waiting. Azerbaijan has
    for many years refused to register a local affiliate of the International
    Religious Liberty Association (IRLA), as well as other religious freedom
    groups. Demonstrators protesting in Belarus against the restrictive 2002
    religion law were fined. In September 2004, the Belarus bureau of the
    Union of Councils for Jews in the Former Soviet Union, which included
    monitoring religious persecution in its work, was denied registration.
    Government reports on religious freedom issues to bodies such as the OSCE
    or Council of Europe are often confidential and closed to public scrutiny.


    CONCLUSION: Government-directed intolerance against religious communities
    remains endemic in many OSCE countries. Many actions to deny
    internationally agreed rights to religious freedom are - as in the case of
    the repression currently being carried out in Uzbekistan - claimed to be
    for reasons of "national security" or "counter-terrorism." But as many of
    these actions predate the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks - and 1999
    Islamic-inspired incursions into Central Asia - these arguments are
    clearly invalid. The comprehensive nature of many of these measures shows
    the hostility of some OSCE member states to the right to exercise the
    faith of one's choice freely, something described by the European Court of
    Human Rights in 1993 as "one of the foundations of a democratic society".
    Events in Uzbekistan offer one warning of what the persistent intolerance
    of religious freedom and other internationally agreed human rights can
    lead to.

    Surveys of countries' religious freedom situation are available on the
    Forum 18 website at http://www.forum18.org/Analyses , along with reporting
    of events at http://www.forum18.org and personal commentaries on religious
    freedom issues at http://www.forum18.org/Commentaries .

    You can subscribe free to the weekly summary or full editions of the news
    service at http://www.forum18.org/Subscribe .
    (END)

    © Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855
    You may reproduce or quote this article provided that credit is given to
    F18News http://www.forum18.org/

    Past and current Forum 18 information can be found at
    http://www.forum18.org/
    =================================================

    --Boundary_(ID_J0SP65Y4qlCqB0+ISH53VA)--
Working...
X