Tweet
The US war with Iran has already begun
(MT Edit -- "The road to Tehran leads through Baku")
Aljazeera.net
Sunday 19 June 2005
By Scott Ritter
Americans, along with the rest of the world, are starting to wake up to
the uncomfortable fact that President George Bush not only lied to them
about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (the ostensible excuse for
the March 2003 invasion and occupation of that country by US forces),
but also about the very process that led to war.
On 16 October 2002, President Bush told the American people that "I have
not ordered the use of force. I hope that the use of force will not
become necessary."
We know now that this statement was itself a lie, that the president, by
late August 2002, had, in fact, signed off on the 'execute' orders
authorising the US military to begin active military operations inside
Iraq, and that these orders were being implemented as early as September
2002, when the US Air Force, assisted by the British Royal Air Force,
began expanding its bombardment of targets inside and outside the
so-called no-fly zone in Iraq.
These operations were designed to degrade Iraqi air defence and command
and control capabilities. They also paved the way for the insertion of
US Special Operations units, who were conducting strategic
reconnaissance, and later direct action, operations against specific
targets inside Iraq, prior to the 19 March 2003 commencement of hostilities.
President Bush had signed a covert finding in late spring 2002, which
authorised the CIA and US Special Operations forces to dispatch
clandestine units into Iraq for the purpose of removing Saddam Hussein
from power.
The fact is that the Iraq war had begun by the beginning of summer 2002,
if not earlier.
This timeline of events has ramifications that go beyond historical
trivia or political investigation into the events of the past.
It represents a record of precedent on the part of the Bush
administration which must be acknowledged when considering the ongoing
events regarding US-Iran relations. As was the case with Iraq pre-March
2003, the Bush administration today speaks of "diplomacy" and a desire
for a "peaceful" resolution to the Iranian question.
But the facts speak of another agenda, that of war and the forceful
removal of the theocratic regime, currently wielding the reigns of power
in Tehran.
As with Iraq, the president has paved the way for the conditioning of
the American public and an all-too-compliant media to accept at face
value the merits of a regime change policy regarding Iran, linking the
regime of the Mullah's to an "axis of evil" (together with the newly
"liberated" Iraq and North Korea), and speaking of the absolute
requirement for the spread of "democracy" to the Iranian people.
"Liberation" and the spread of "democracy" have become none-too-subtle
code words within the neo-conservative cabal that formulates and
executes American foreign policy today for militarism and war.
By the intensity of the "liberation/democracy" rhetoric alone, Americans
should be put on notice that Iran is well-fixed in the cross-hairs as
the next target for the illegal policy of regime change being
implemented by the Bush administration.
But Americans, and indeed much of the rest of the world, continue to be
lulled into a false sense of complacency by the fact that overt
conventional military operations have not yet commenced between the
United States and Iran.
As such, many hold out the false hope that an extension of the current
insanity in Iraq can be postponed or prevented in the case of Iran. But
this is a fool's dream.
The reality is that the US war with Iran has already begun. As we speak,
American over flights of Iranian soil are taking place, using pilotless
drones and other, more sophisticated, capabilities.
The violation of a sovereign nation's airspace is an act of war in and
of itself. But the war with Iran has gone far beyond the
intelligence-gathering phase.
President Bush has taken advantage of the sweeping powers granted to him
in the aftermath of 11 September 2001, to wage a global war against
terror and to initiate several covert offensive operations inside Iran.
The most visible of these is the CIA-backed actions recently undertaken
by the Mujahadeen el-Khalq, or MEK, an Iranian opposition group, once
run by Saddam Hussein's dreaded intelligence services, but now working
exclusively for the CIA's Directorate of Operations.
It is bitter irony that the CIA is using a group still labelled as a
terrorist organisation, a group trained in the art of explosive
assassination by the same intelligence units of the former regime of
Saddam Hussein, who are slaughtering American soldiers in Iraq today, to
carry out remote bombings in Iran of the sort that the Bush
administration condemns on a daily basis inside Iraq.
Perhaps the adage of "one man's freedom fighter is another man's
terrorist" has finally been embraced by the White House, exposing as
utter hypocrisy the entire underlying notions governing the ongoing
global war on terror.
But the CIA-backed campaign of MEK terror bombings in Iran are not the
only action ongoing against Iran.
To the north, in neighbouring Azerbaijan, the US military is preparing a
base of operations for a massive military presence that will foretell a
major land-based campaign designed to capture Tehran.
Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld's interest in Azerbaijan may have
escaped the blinkered Western media, but Russia and the Caucasus nations
understand only too well that the die has been cast regarding
Azerbaijan's role in the upcoming war with Iran.
The ethnic links between the Azeri of northern Iran and Azerbaijan were
long exploited by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and this vehicle
for internal manipulation has been seized upon by CIA paramilitary
operatives and US Special Operations units who are training with
Azerbaijan forces to form special units capable of operating inside Iran
for the purpose of intelligence gathering, direct action, and mobilising
indigenous opposition to the Mullahs in Tehran.
But this is only one use the US has planned for Azerbaijan. American
military aircraft, operating from forward bases in Azerbaijan, will have
a much shorter distance to fly when striking targets in and around Tehran.
In fact, US air power should be able to maintain a nearly 24-hour a day
presence over Tehran airspace once military hostilities commence.
No longer will the United States need to consider employment of Cold
War-dated plans which called for moving on Tehran from the Arab Gulf
cities of Chah Bahar and Bandar Abbas. US Marine Corps units will be
able to secure these towns in order to protect the vital Straits of
Hormuz, but the need to advance inland has been eliminated.
A much shorter route to Tehran now exists - the coastal highway running
along the Caspian Sea from Azerbaijan to Tehran.
US military planners have already begun war games calling for the
deployment of multi-divisional forces into Azerbaijan.
Logistical planning is well advanced concerning the basing of US air and
ground power in Azerbaijan.
Given the fact that the bulk of the logistical support and command and
control capability required to wage a war with Iran is already forward
deployed in the region thanks to the massive US presence in Iraq, the
build-up time for a war with Iran will be significantly reduced compared
to even the accelerated time tables witnessed with Iraq in 2002-2003.
America and the Western nations continue to be fixated on the ongoing
tragedy and debacle that is Iraq. Much needed debate on the reasoning
behind the war with Iraq and the failed post-war occupation of Iraq is
finally starting to spring up in the United States and elsewhere.
Normally, this would represent a good turn of events. But with
everyone's heads rooted in the events of the past, many are missing out
on the crime that is about to be repeated by the Bush administration in
Iran - an illegal war of aggression, based on false premise, carried out
with little regard to either the people of Iran or the United States.
Most Americans, together with the mainstream American media, are blind
to the tell-tale signs of war, waiting, instead, for some formal
declaration of hostility, a made-for-TV moment such as was witnessed on
19 March 2003.
We now know that the war had started much earlier. Likewise, history
will show that the US-led war with Iran will not have begun once a
similar formal statement is offered by the Bush administration, but,
rather, had already been under way since June 2005, when the CIA began
its programme of MEK-executed terror bombings in Iran.
Scott Ritter is a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq, 1991-1998, and
author of Iraq Confidential: The Untold Story of America's Intelligence
Conspiracy, to be published by I B Tauris in October 2005.
The opinions expressed here are the author's and do not necessarily
reflect the editorial position or have the endorsement of Aljazeera.
You can find this article at:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/7896BBD4-28AB-48BA-A949-2096A02F864D.htm
(MT Edit -- "The road to Tehran leads through Baku")
Aljazeera.net
Sunday 19 June 2005
By Scott Ritter
Americans, along with the rest of the world, are starting to wake up to
the uncomfortable fact that President George Bush not only lied to them
about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (the ostensible excuse for
the March 2003 invasion and occupation of that country by US forces),
but also about the very process that led to war.
On 16 October 2002, President Bush told the American people that "I have
not ordered the use of force. I hope that the use of force will not
become necessary."
We know now that this statement was itself a lie, that the president, by
late August 2002, had, in fact, signed off on the 'execute' orders
authorising the US military to begin active military operations inside
Iraq, and that these orders were being implemented as early as September
2002, when the US Air Force, assisted by the British Royal Air Force,
began expanding its bombardment of targets inside and outside the
so-called no-fly zone in Iraq.
These operations were designed to degrade Iraqi air defence and command
and control capabilities. They also paved the way for the insertion of
US Special Operations units, who were conducting strategic
reconnaissance, and later direct action, operations against specific
targets inside Iraq, prior to the 19 March 2003 commencement of hostilities.
President Bush had signed a covert finding in late spring 2002, which
authorised the CIA and US Special Operations forces to dispatch
clandestine units into Iraq for the purpose of removing Saddam Hussein
from power.
The fact is that the Iraq war had begun by the beginning of summer 2002,
if not earlier.
This timeline of events has ramifications that go beyond historical
trivia or political investigation into the events of the past.
It represents a record of precedent on the part of the Bush
administration which must be acknowledged when considering the ongoing
events regarding US-Iran relations. As was the case with Iraq pre-March
2003, the Bush administration today speaks of "diplomacy" and a desire
for a "peaceful" resolution to the Iranian question.
But the facts speak of another agenda, that of war and the forceful
removal of the theocratic regime, currently wielding the reigns of power
in Tehran.
As with Iraq, the president has paved the way for the conditioning of
the American public and an all-too-compliant media to accept at face
value the merits of a regime change policy regarding Iran, linking the
regime of the Mullah's to an "axis of evil" (together with the newly
"liberated" Iraq and North Korea), and speaking of the absolute
requirement for the spread of "democracy" to the Iranian people.
"Liberation" and the spread of "democracy" have become none-too-subtle
code words within the neo-conservative cabal that formulates and
executes American foreign policy today for militarism and war.
By the intensity of the "liberation/democracy" rhetoric alone, Americans
should be put on notice that Iran is well-fixed in the cross-hairs as
the next target for the illegal policy of regime change being
implemented by the Bush administration.
But Americans, and indeed much of the rest of the world, continue to be
lulled into a false sense of complacency by the fact that overt
conventional military operations have not yet commenced between the
United States and Iran.
As such, many hold out the false hope that an extension of the current
insanity in Iraq can be postponed or prevented in the case of Iran. But
this is a fool's dream.
The reality is that the US war with Iran has already begun. As we speak,
American over flights of Iranian soil are taking place, using pilotless
drones and other, more sophisticated, capabilities.
The violation of a sovereign nation's airspace is an act of war in and
of itself. But the war with Iran has gone far beyond the
intelligence-gathering phase.
President Bush has taken advantage of the sweeping powers granted to him
in the aftermath of 11 September 2001, to wage a global war against
terror and to initiate several covert offensive operations inside Iran.
The most visible of these is the CIA-backed actions recently undertaken
by the Mujahadeen el-Khalq, or MEK, an Iranian opposition group, once
run by Saddam Hussein's dreaded intelligence services, but now working
exclusively for the CIA's Directorate of Operations.
It is bitter irony that the CIA is using a group still labelled as a
terrorist organisation, a group trained in the art of explosive
assassination by the same intelligence units of the former regime of
Saddam Hussein, who are slaughtering American soldiers in Iraq today, to
carry out remote bombings in Iran of the sort that the Bush
administration condemns on a daily basis inside Iraq.
Perhaps the adage of "one man's freedom fighter is another man's
terrorist" has finally been embraced by the White House, exposing as
utter hypocrisy the entire underlying notions governing the ongoing
global war on terror.
But the CIA-backed campaign of MEK terror bombings in Iran are not the
only action ongoing against Iran.
To the north, in neighbouring Azerbaijan, the US military is preparing a
base of operations for a massive military presence that will foretell a
major land-based campaign designed to capture Tehran.
Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld's interest in Azerbaijan may have
escaped the blinkered Western media, but Russia and the Caucasus nations
understand only too well that the die has been cast regarding
Azerbaijan's role in the upcoming war with Iran.
The ethnic links between the Azeri of northern Iran and Azerbaijan were
long exploited by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and this vehicle
for internal manipulation has been seized upon by CIA paramilitary
operatives and US Special Operations units who are training with
Azerbaijan forces to form special units capable of operating inside Iran
for the purpose of intelligence gathering, direct action, and mobilising
indigenous opposition to the Mullahs in Tehran.
But this is only one use the US has planned for Azerbaijan. American
military aircraft, operating from forward bases in Azerbaijan, will have
a much shorter distance to fly when striking targets in and around Tehran.
In fact, US air power should be able to maintain a nearly 24-hour a day
presence over Tehran airspace once military hostilities commence.
No longer will the United States need to consider employment of Cold
War-dated plans which called for moving on Tehran from the Arab Gulf
cities of Chah Bahar and Bandar Abbas. US Marine Corps units will be
able to secure these towns in order to protect the vital Straits of
Hormuz, but the need to advance inland has been eliminated.
A much shorter route to Tehran now exists - the coastal highway running
along the Caspian Sea from Azerbaijan to Tehran.
US military planners have already begun war games calling for the
deployment of multi-divisional forces into Azerbaijan.
Logistical planning is well advanced concerning the basing of US air and
ground power in Azerbaijan.
Given the fact that the bulk of the logistical support and command and
control capability required to wage a war with Iran is already forward
deployed in the region thanks to the massive US presence in Iraq, the
build-up time for a war with Iran will be significantly reduced compared
to even the accelerated time tables witnessed with Iraq in 2002-2003.
America and the Western nations continue to be fixated on the ongoing
tragedy and debacle that is Iraq. Much needed debate on the reasoning
behind the war with Iraq and the failed post-war occupation of Iraq is
finally starting to spring up in the United States and elsewhere.
Normally, this would represent a good turn of events. But with
everyone's heads rooted in the events of the past, many are missing out
on the crime that is about to be repeated by the Bush administration in
Iran - an illegal war of aggression, based on false premise, carried out
with little regard to either the people of Iran or the United States.
Most Americans, together with the mainstream American media, are blind
to the tell-tale signs of war, waiting, instead, for some formal
declaration of hostility, a made-for-TV moment such as was witnessed on
19 March 2003.
We now know that the war had started much earlier. Likewise, history
will show that the US-led war with Iran will not have begun once a
similar formal statement is offered by the Bush administration, but,
rather, had already been under way since June 2005, when the CIA began
its programme of MEK-executed terror bombings in Iran.
Scott Ritter is a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq, 1991-1998, and
author of Iraq Confidential: The Untold Story of America's Intelligence
Conspiracy, to be published by I B Tauris in October 2005.
The opinions expressed here are the author's and do not necessarily
reflect the editorial position or have the endorsement of Aljazeera.
You can find this article at:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/7896BBD4-28AB-48BA-A949-2096A02F864D.htm