Tweet
Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR)
June 22 2005
OPPOSITION ANGRY AT KARABAKH POLL
Government declares victory in parliamentary elections in the
mountainous republic.
By Karine Ohanian in Stepanakert
The Nagorny Karabakh opposition suffered a stinging electoral defeat
in the June 19 parliamentary elections, winning only three seats out
of 33 in the new assembly.
Karabakh opposition parties are now considering their next move after
faring badly in a poll that many had expected them to do well in.
However, after the liveliest election in the mountainous territory
since the end of the war in 1994, most observers agree the voting was
free and many analysts put the drubbing down to a strategic
outflanking of the opposition by the authorities.
There were more than 130 non-governmental observers monitoring the
polls from many countries, though the international community has not
recognised the legitimacy of the election and Azerbaijan has strongly
condemned them since Armenian-run Nagorny Karabakh is an unrecognised
state.
One of the observers, James Hooper, head of the US-based Public
International Law and Policy Group expressed hope that democratic
elections in Karabakh could positively influence the peace process
with Azerbaijan.
`The region will only win if Azerbaijan and Karabakh are competing in
democracy and not an arms race,' he told IWPR.
According to preliminary results, pro-government forces won a
convincing victory, with two pro-government parties, the Democratic
Party of Artsakh and Free Motherland, claiming a total of 22 seats in
the 33-seat parliament. A further five seats went to independents
known for their pro-government sympathies.
The opposition alliance, ARF Dashnaktsutiun-Movement 88, gained 24.4
per cent of the popular vote, giving it just three seats.
Movement 88 is a newly formed party, while Dashnaktsutiun is
Armenia's oldest nationalist party. Their opposition to the
government was not over policy on the status of Karabakh - all the
parties want it to be separate from Azerbaijan - but on criticism of
the government's democratic record.
These elections differed markedly from three previous polls in
Nagorny Karabakh. They took place under a new electoral law, with the
use of transparent ballot boxes and with an unprecedented 127
candidates registered to run.
Most non-governmental foreign observers saw few irregularities and
said that the elections had been largely free and fair.
`I witnessed a completely democratic electoral process, and I think
many recognised states would do well to take Nagorny Karabakh as an
example,' said Mark Almond of the British Helsinki Human Rights
Group. `A lot here was organised better than in Great Britain and in
this regard we have something to learn.'
Only one foreign observer, Milan Stefanec from the Czech Republic,
said what he saw at nine stations fell short of European standards.
At one station, he said the chairman rejected a complaint by an
opposition observer, calling it `unimportant'. There were also
instances where problems with documentation were sorted out not by
the electoral commission but by the security forces, he said.
Some Karabakhis also though the poll was unfair. `Many people went
and voted not for people they chose themselves but for people who
were named for them by their bosses,' said Zhan Apresian, a voter in
the village of Askeran.
A spokesman for the opposition alliance said his movement would soon
publish information about electoral irregularities. `The elections
were unfree, unfair and untransparent,' said Gegam Bagdasarian.
The leader of another losing party, Karen Ohanjenian of Social
Justice, also insisted the elections were rigged. `A system of buying
votes has demonstrated how corrupt society in Karabakh is. A
corrupted democracy is prevailing here,' he said.
People working on behalf of different candidates told IWPR they had
seen residents voting without proper registration documents and
entering polling booths in pairs.
Most of the complaints, however, have focussed on the use of
so-called `administrative resource', pressure from the authorities on
electors to vote for official candidates. People spoke of threats of
being dismissed from work, bribery and pressure being put on army
conscripts.
`First they asphalted our road, then they fixed our neighbour's
roof,' said Galina Babayan. `One person offered money, someone else
built a children's playground. No one dared to try to bribe me, but
my friends and neighbours got very concrete offers.'
However, political analyst David Babayan urged the opposition to look
not at government corruption but at its own strategy, which he
believes was the key to its defeat.
`It acted impulsively, from the start setting the highest priority on
criticising the authorities. For the first 10 days voters took that
well, but then they got tired from the endless criticisms,' he said.
A local expert who asked not to be named added that the introduction
of a second pro-government party, Free Motherland, was a clever move
by the authorities to avenge an opposition victory in last year's
elections for mayor of Stepanakert.
The results have given a boost to Karabakh president Arkady Gukasian,
who has one year remaining on his second term.
On election day, Gukasian called the poll `the most honest elections
in the entire post-Soviet space'. Asked to comment on Azerbaijan's
rejection, he said, `Today the attention of the people and observers
is fixed on processes inside Karabakh, which directly affect the
independent future of the Nagorny Karabakh Republic.'
Tension is still high in Karabakh. On June 20 there was alarm at the
news that opposition candidate and war veteran Pavel Manukian had
been badly beaten up after an incident in the defence ministry. In
hospital Manukian named the names of two well-known Karabakh
generals.
Gukasian said the incident would be investigated and criminal charges
brought if necessary and talks were held with the opposition. `When
someone is hurt it's not important who won and lost,' said a top
official. `The authorities won the election but today it's more
important that the state does not lose.'
Karine Ohanian is a journalist with the Demo Newspaper in
Stepanakert.
June 22 2005
OPPOSITION ANGRY AT KARABAKH POLL
Government declares victory in parliamentary elections in the
mountainous republic.
By Karine Ohanian in Stepanakert
The Nagorny Karabakh opposition suffered a stinging electoral defeat
in the June 19 parliamentary elections, winning only three seats out
of 33 in the new assembly.
Karabakh opposition parties are now considering their next move after
faring badly in a poll that many had expected them to do well in.
However, after the liveliest election in the mountainous territory
since the end of the war in 1994, most observers agree the voting was
free and many analysts put the drubbing down to a strategic
outflanking of the opposition by the authorities.
There were more than 130 non-governmental observers monitoring the
polls from many countries, though the international community has not
recognised the legitimacy of the election and Azerbaijan has strongly
condemned them since Armenian-run Nagorny Karabakh is an unrecognised
state.
One of the observers, James Hooper, head of the US-based Public
International Law and Policy Group expressed hope that democratic
elections in Karabakh could positively influence the peace process
with Azerbaijan.
`The region will only win if Azerbaijan and Karabakh are competing in
democracy and not an arms race,' he told IWPR.
According to preliminary results, pro-government forces won a
convincing victory, with two pro-government parties, the Democratic
Party of Artsakh and Free Motherland, claiming a total of 22 seats in
the 33-seat parliament. A further five seats went to independents
known for their pro-government sympathies.
The opposition alliance, ARF Dashnaktsutiun-Movement 88, gained 24.4
per cent of the popular vote, giving it just three seats.
Movement 88 is a newly formed party, while Dashnaktsutiun is
Armenia's oldest nationalist party. Their opposition to the
government was not over policy on the status of Karabakh - all the
parties want it to be separate from Azerbaijan - but on criticism of
the government's democratic record.
These elections differed markedly from three previous polls in
Nagorny Karabakh. They took place under a new electoral law, with the
use of transparent ballot boxes and with an unprecedented 127
candidates registered to run.
Most non-governmental foreign observers saw few irregularities and
said that the elections had been largely free and fair.
`I witnessed a completely democratic electoral process, and I think
many recognised states would do well to take Nagorny Karabakh as an
example,' said Mark Almond of the British Helsinki Human Rights
Group. `A lot here was organised better than in Great Britain and in
this regard we have something to learn.'
Only one foreign observer, Milan Stefanec from the Czech Republic,
said what he saw at nine stations fell short of European standards.
At one station, he said the chairman rejected a complaint by an
opposition observer, calling it `unimportant'. There were also
instances where problems with documentation were sorted out not by
the electoral commission but by the security forces, he said.
Some Karabakhis also though the poll was unfair. `Many people went
and voted not for people they chose themselves but for people who
were named for them by their bosses,' said Zhan Apresian, a voter in
the village of Askeran.
A spokesman for the opposition alliance said his movement would soon
publish information about electoral irregularities. `The elections
were unfree, unfair and untransparent,' said Gegam Bagdasarian.
The leader of another losing party, Karen Ohanjenian of Social
Justice, also insisted the elections were rigged. `A system of buying
votes has demonstrated how corrupt society in Karabakh is. A
corrupted democracy is prevailing here,' he said.
People working on behalf of different candidates told IWPR they had
seen residents voting without proper registration documents and
entering polling booths in pairs.
Most of the complaints, however, have focussed on the use of
so-called `administrative resource', pressure from the authorities on
electors to vote for official candidates. People spoke of threats of
being dismissed from work, bribery and pressure being put on army
conscripts.
`First they asphalted our road, then they fixed our neighbour's
roof,' said Galina Babayan. `One person offered money, someone else
built a children's playground. No one dared to try to bribe me, but
my friends and neighbours got very concrete offers.'
However, political analyst David Babayan urged the opposition to look
not at government corruption but at its own strategy, which he
believes was the key to its defeat.
`It acted impulsively, from the start setting the highest priority on
criticising the authorities. For the first 10 days voters took that
well, but then they got tired from the endless criticisms,' he said.
A local expert who asked not to be named added that the introduction
of a second pro-government party, Free Motherland, was a clever move
by the authorities to avenge an opposition victory in last year's
elections for mayor of Stepanakert.
The results have given a boost to Karabakh president Arkady Gukasian,
who has one year remaining on his second term.
On election day, Gukasian called the poll `the most honest elections
in the entire post-Soviet space'. Asked to comment on Azerbaijan's
rejection, he said, `Today the attention of the people and observers
is fixed on processes inside Karabakh, which directly affect the
independent future of the Nagorny Karabakh Republic.'
Tension is still high in Karabakh. On June 20 there was alarm at the
news that opposition candidate and war veteran Pavel Manukian had
been badly beaten up after an incident in the defence ministry. In
hospital Manukian named the names of two well-known Karabakh
generals.
Gukasian said the incident would be investigated and criminal charges
brought if necessary and talks were held with the opposition. `When
someone is hurt it's not important who won and lost,' said a top
official. `The authorities won the election but today it's more
important that the state does not lose.'
Karine Ohanian is a journalist with the Demo Newspaper in
Stepanakert.