Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Businessman Demands Calling To Account Officials Who GroundlesslyDep

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Businessman Demands Calling To Account Officials Who GroundlesslyDep

    BUSINESSMAN DEMANDS CALLING TO ACCOUNT OFFICIALS WHO GRPOUNDLESSLY
    DEPRIVED HIM OF FREEDOM

    YEREVAN, MARCH 25, NOYAN TAPAN. Hakob Tcharoyan, a businessman, accuses
    the former prosecutor of Gegharkunik marz, member of the RA Council of
    Justice Albert Margarian of corruption. H. Tcharoyan, whom the court
    found guilty of an attempt to lay hold of the property of another
    person by fraud, demands that a new investigation be conducted,
    his property returned, and the guilty officials be prosecuted. At
    the March 23 press conference H. Tcharoyan said that Margarian and
    the investigators of the Gegharkunik prosecutor's office Hovsep
    Sargsian and Vardan Avetisian took a bribe from his former partner -
    the community head of the village Tchotchkan (Lori marz) Varuzhan
    Tamazian and opened a trumped-up criminal case against him, according
    to which he alone (without Tamazian) made an attempt, by forgery, to
    take the possession of a flour mill being sold at auction. According
    to T. Tcharoyan, the investigator H. Sargsian demanded a bribe from
    him as well, and upon Tchroyan's refusal, he fabricated evidence
    against him. Later H. Sargsian refused to investigate the case,
    whereas the next investigator Vardan Avetisian also produced false
    evidence. H. Tcharoyan considered the decision made by the court of the
    first instance of Lori marz (chaired by Judge Vahan Hovhannisian) to be
    the result of an order and an obviously ufounded one. Before getting
    to the above mentioned court, the case was examined by the court of
    the first instance of Gegharkunik marz. The first judge declined to
    examine thre case, the second judge was challenged by the prosecution
    (since, according to Tcharoyan, this judge realized the case was a
    fabricated one), the third judge ruled the case should go to the court
    of the first instance of Lori marz - allegedly, to prevent the regional
    prosecutor's office from putting pressure on the court. H. Tcharoyan
    was sentenced to 4.5 years' imprisonment and spent 3 years and 3 months
    in prison. After much delay, the highest court left his court sentence
    unchanged. Thus H. Tcharoyan has exhausted all means of achieving
    justice in Armenia and intends to apply to the European Court of Human
    Rights. The businessman stated that the charge of attempting to lay
    hold of the valuable property of V. Tamazian by means of fraud and
    abuse of confidence was an ungrounded and trumped-up one. According
    to him, the point is that Tamazian and he came into conflict over
    the property, and Tamazian decided to retain the mill by getting rid
    of Tcharoyan. According to the RA Office of Prosecutor General, no
    sufficient evidence has been obtained to open a criminal case based on
    the bribe taking fact mentioned in H. Tcharoyan's application. The
    refusal to open a criminal case was motivated by the absence of a
    crime - the investigators of the Gegharkunik prosecutor's office
    denied having demanded or taken a bribe, while V. Tamazian denied
    that he had given one. H. Sharoyan refused to name the source that
    had informed him about Tamazian's bribing the prosecutors.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X