Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Politics or propaganda?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Politics or propaganda?

    Politics or propaganda?
    By Karine Mangasarian

    Yerkir
    29 April 05

    On the eve of the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide the Turkish
    Prime Minister Rejep Tayip Erdogan extended a letter to the Armenian
    president Robert Kocharian proposing to establish a joint group of
    Armenian and Turkish historians and other experts that would research
    the events of 1915 and would present the results of the research to
    the international community.

    At first sight, the Turkish prime minister's letter could be seen as
    a pretext for Turkey to start relations with Armenia had it not been
    for the proposal to appeal to the historians of the two countries to
    sort out the relations between Armenia and Turkey.

    President Robert Kocharian's answer to Erdogan stated, "Your
    proposal to look back at the past cannot be efficient since it
    does not deal with the present and the future. In order to engage
    in an efficient dialog we need to establish a favorable political
    environment." Kocharian also pointed out that the responsibility
    of developing relations between the two countries lies with their
    governments and not the historians.

    Now that we are familiar with the two letters, what conclusions can we
    draw? How sincere was Erdogan's proposal? Was it not made for merely
    propaganda purposes especially that it was made on the eve of the
    Genocide commemoration?

    Most of the Armenian political forces believe that the Turkish prime
    minister's proposal aimed at countering the increasing international
    pressure on Turkey.

    "It is obvious that the Turkish prime minister's proposal was
    a political move aimed at minimizing the increasing pressure
    on Turkey. I think it was a miscalculated move since it was more
    propaganda than anything else, and everyone knows about this," head
    of ARF's parliamentary faction Levon Mkrtchian said.

    As to president Kocharian's response, Mkrtchian believes his letter
    emphasized the weakest points in Erdogan's letter whereby the latter
    tried to transfer the issues that should be dealt with by the state
    to the historians.

    "This is a groundless proposal and can stand no criticism either from
    diplomatic or from academic perspectives. The president's response is
    rather well grounded and reflects the main directions of our foreign
    policy," Mkrtchian said.

    Commenting on the possible developments of the incident Mkrtchian,
    noted that Erdogan will either reply again or will abstain from any
    further activities since the commemoration of the 90th anniversary
    of the Armenian Genocide is over and the Turkish political circles
    no longer need to launch such propaganda activities.

    Chairman of the New Communist Party of Armenia Yuri Manukian noted that
    the Turkish prime minister and those Turkish officials who share his
    position are first of all the enemies of their own population since
    they continue the policies of Sultan Hamid. "The Turkish leadership
    never tells the truth to its people. I agree with president Kocharian's
    response.

    The time for playing games is over and the Armenian leadership has
    to go on pursuing international denunciation of the Genocide with
    its foreign policy and in cooperation with the Diaspora Armenian
    organizations," Manukian said adding that these activities should be
    carried out not by historians but by politicians.
    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X