Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mankind's deadly toll

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mankind's deadly toll

    New York Daily News, NY
    Sept 11 2005

    Mankind's deadly toll


    One of the many disturbing aspects of the Gulf Coast disaster is the
    way everyone has been repeating this one phrase: A devastating
    hurricane hit was never a question of "if," they say, but "when."
    It is the same wording people use when they talk about another
    terrorist attack here in New York.

    For the last four years, an "if, not when" at the hand of man has
    haunted most New Yorkers' scariest daydreams. The London bombings
    turned up the volume. So does an anniversary like today.

    But as we see the bodies in New Orleans and feel for the families
    there, it's obvious that Mother Nature harbors a wrath at least as
    terrible as Osama Bin Laden's. And guess what? A 'cane could drown
    N.Y.C., a headline in the Daily News announced Thursday. Said the
    story, "New York is a coastal city in a vulnerable spot."

    Vulnerable again? It's enough to make a mere mortal wonder which to
    fear more: man or nature. And it is hardly reassuring to hear the
    answer: Humans are gaining the deadly edge.

    This is a new distinction for our species. Until the last century,
    says Steven Katz, director of the Elie Wiesel Center at Boston
    University, nature was probably responsible for more death than
    murderous mankind. And if you count disease, nature still is - maybe.
    No one is absolutely sure about the math.

    But if we are talking about natural disasters like floods and fires
    versus man-made evils like war and banishment, humans recently pulled
    ahead in the destruction sweepstakes.

    "In the 20th century, the estimate is that 100 million people were
    killed by government," says Katz. These include all the soldiers who
    died in World Wars I and II - 5 million Russians alone in the first
    six months of fighting Hitler - as well as the 6 million Jews
    exterminated in the Holocaust, all the Chinese killed in China's
    civil war and later Cultural Revolution, millions more killed in the
    India-Pakistan War, millions slain by Stalin, as well as untold
    murders in Rwanda, Uganda, Croatia, Cambodia, Armenia, Argentina. ...
    The list, unfortunately, goes on and on.

    What's worse, we civilians are only becoming more imperiled, says
    Stephen Couch, a sociologist at Penn State. "Centuries ago, wars were
    by and large limited to professional armies fighting one another," he
    says. "So the majority of casualties were military. Now, the majority
    of casualties are civilians."

    This is a byproduct of what we call progress. "New weapons made new
    tactics possible, like the deliberate wiping out of civilian
    populations," says Couch, citing Dresden and Hiroshima.

    Terrorism is just the latest military technique, and Couch is not
    optimistic about how it may evolve. "I think that the destructiveness
    of war is likely to remain the same or perhaps get worse, with all
    sorts of weapons of mass destruction, atomic proliferation and
    biological warfare. The history of weaponry is that if you have a
    weapon, it gets used."

    Mother Nature will continue to wreak her tsunamis, floods,
    earthquakes and hurricanes, all of them devastating. But she does not
    spend her days devising new ways to destroy mankind.

    That is what the Bin Ladens of this world do.

    In New York, as we pray for all those lost and prepare for all
    eventualities, we must vow to work for peace. Because it's not Mother
    Nature that we can change.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X