Tweet
Kathimerini, Greece
Sept 15 2005
Unwanted engagement
By Petros Papaconstantinou
The failure by European Union officials yesterday to establish a
joint negotiating position for Ankara's membership talks is not
attributable to pressure from Nicosia but to other factors.
Despite France's modest compromise in the joint Franco-British deal,
Paris wants an emergency summit by the end of 2006 to evaluate
whether Ankara has achieved full implementation of its obligations
before it can start negotiating membership. Austria is demanding
clarification that talks will not necessarily lead to full
membership, envisaging rather a `privileged partnership' similar to
Angela Merkel's proposal.
In corridor talk, European envoys argue that the main roadblock to
Ankara's EU ambitions is not Cyprus but the Kurdish issue. Despite
recent democratization reforms, Turkey's handling of ethnic minority
issues leaves much to be desired. Charges against novelist Orhan
Pamuk for his comments on Turkey's killings of Armenians and Kurds
echo European concerns. Olli Rehn, EU commissioner for enlargement,
called the date of Pamuk's trial, set to clash with an EU summit, a
`provocation.'
The hardening of EU states' stand on Turkey is the result of many
different political factors. It's highly unlikely that it will be
reversed, even though Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's
complaints about EU states `shifting the goalposts' ahead of the
entry talks are partly justified.
The moment of truth is approaching for Turkey as well as Europe. The
two sides would be better off breaking an unwanted engagement - for
the sake of a special relationship - than canceling the wedding after
the invitations have been sent out. If, on the other hand, the
Europeans want full membership for Turkey, they must hammer out a
road map of specific deadlines and conditions, including a settlement
of the Cyprus problem.
Sept 15 2005
Unwanted engagement
By Petros Papaconstantinou
The failure by European Union officials yesterday to establish a
joint negotiating position for Ankara's membership talks is not
attributable to pressure from Nicosia but to other factors.
Despite France's modest compromise in the joint Franco-British deal,
Paris wants an emergency summit by the end of 2006 to evaluate
whether Ankara has achieved full implementation of its obligations
before it can start negotiating membership. Austria is demanding
clarification that talks will not necessarily lead to full
membership, envisaging rather a `privileged partnership' similar to
Angela Merkel's proposal.
In corridor talk, European envoys argue that the main roadblock to
Ankara's EU ambitions is not Cyprus but the Kurdish issue. Despite
recent democratization reforms, Turkey's handling of ethnic minority
issues leaves much to be desired. Charges against novelist Orhan
Pamuk for his comments on Turkey's killings of Armenians and Kurds
echo European concerns. Olli Rehn, EU commissioner for enlargement,
called the date of Pamuk's trial, set to clash with an EU summit, a
`provocation.'
The hardening of EU states' stand on Turkey is the result of many
different political factors. It's highly unlikely that it will be
reversed, even though Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's
complaints about EU states `shifting the goalposts' ahead of the
entry talks are partly justified.
The moment of truth is approaching for Turkey as well as Europe. The
two sides would be better off breaking an unwanted engagement - for
the sake of a special relationship - than canceling the wedding after
the invitations have been sent out. If, on the other hand, the
Europeans want full membership for Turkey, they must hammer out a
road map of specific deadlines and conditions, including a settlement
of the Cyprus problem.