Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: 'Judiciary Obstructs Democratization In Turkey'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: 'Judiciary Obstructs Democratization In Turkey'

    'JUDICIARY OBSTRUCTS DEMOCRATIZATION IN TURKEY'
    By Cihan News Agency

    Zaman, Turkey
    Sept 27 2005

    zaman.com

    A recent conference on Armenians during the decline of the Ottoman
    Empire in Turkey did not attract the expected level of attention from
    the European media.

    Despite recent reforms that have been made in line with plans to
    become a member of the European Union (EU), Turkey's judicial system
    was "riddled with loopholes" the British newspaper The Financial
    Times commented.

    German Suddeutsche only reported that the conference location was
    changed at the last moment and that the "taboos" were gradually
    disappearing.

    As for the cancellation of the conference on Armenians, The
    Financial Times said, "Nobody yet knows whether the progressives
    or the reactionaries have won the battle over free speech that has
    raged in Turkey for the past few days. One thing is clear, however:
    despite years of reforms, the country's justice system is riddled
    with loopholes."

    Commenting on Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk, who will appear in court
    because due to his remarks on Armenians and Kurds to a Swiss newspaper,
    the Financial Times noted:

    "The two incidents suggest how the criminal justice and judicial
    systems steeped in decades of nationalist ideology, reinforced by
    an authoritarian constitution, can betray a reforming government's
    best intentions."

    The Guardian said, "The European commission accused the Turkish
    judiciary of "provocation" on Friday, after an Istanbul court prevented
    the conference from opening."

    Ankara's opponents in the EU would have been strengthened if the ban
    over the conference had succeeded, The Guardian wrote.

    German newspaper Die Welt assessed that the conference would be
    boring news if organized in another country, but it caused a scandal
    in Turkey.

    Turkey was absolutely against the so-called genocide thesis the
    newspaper continued, and that the government had launched a campaign
    to refute this opinion.

    Die Welt claimed that mentioning the so-called Armenian genocide was
    a crime in Turkey. The conference, asserted in Die Welt, passed in a
    peaceful atmosphere and that none of the historians attending dared
    to utter the word "genocide" during their presentations.
Working...
X