Tweet
REPRESENTATIVES OF ARMENIAN SIDE LEAVE FOR BUDAPEST FOR TAKING PART IN COURT SITTING ON CASE OF ARMENIAN OFFICER'S MURDER
Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Apr 03 2006
YEREVAN, APRIL 3, NOYAN TAPAN - ARMENIANS TODAY. Representative of
RA Defence Ministry Hayk Demoyan and representative of the aggrieved
party, lawyer Nazeli Vardanian left for Budapest for the purpose of
taking part in the court sitting on case of murder of Officer of RA
Armed Forces Gurgen Margarian. Noyan Tapan correspondent was informed
about it by the Spokesperson for RA Defence Minister, Colonel Seyran
Shahsuvarian. At the April 4 sitting, Budapest city court will hear
the final speech of Azeri Officer Ramil Safarov who killed Gurgen
Margarian with an axe. The prosecution and defence parties will
make speeches the same day. The court will pronounce a verdict
on April 13. To recap, the 4th expert conclusion was made public
at the previous, March 7 court sitting. The conclusion recognized
R.Safarov's emotional manifestations within the limits of the norm,
the defendant was recognized sane and the second expert insisting on
Safarov's "limited consciousness" again was not able to ground his
conclusion at the sitting.
Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Apr 03 2006
YEREVAN, APRIL 3, NOYAN TAPAN - ARMENIANS TODAY. Representative of
RA Defence Ministry Hayk Demoyan and representative of the aggrieved
party, lawyer Nazeli Vardanian left for Budapest for the purpose of
taking part in the court sitting on case of murder of Officer of RA
Armed Forces Gurgen Margarian. Noyan Tapan correspondent was informed
about it by the Spokesperson for RA Defence Minister, Colonel Seyran
Shahsuvarian. At the April 4 sitting, Budapest city court will hear
the final speech of Azeri Officer Ramil Safarov who killed Gurgen
Margarian with an axe. The prosecution and defence parties will
make speeches the same day. The court will pronounce a verdict
on April 13. To recap, the 4th expert conclusion was made public
at the previous, March 7 court sitting. The conclusion recognized
R.Safarov's emotional manifestations within the limits of the norm,
the defendant was recognized sane and the second expert insisting on
Safarov's "limited consciousness" again was not able to ground his
conclusion at the sitting.