Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blowback in Africa

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Blowback in Africa

    Op-Ed: Blowback in Africa
    By RAFFI KHATCHADOURIAN

    New York Times
    April 28, 2006

    EVER since Chad gained independence 46 years ago, it has been a
    world-class model of political dysfunction. In the 1970's, Chad's
    president, François Tombalbaye, compelled civil servants to
    renounce Western customs, undergo a tribal initiation rite known as
    yondo and profess belief in a nationalist creed he called
    Chaditude. He was executed in 1975. In the 1980's, a rebel leader
    named Hissène Habré led an army to the presidential palace and
    seized power. He became known as the "African Pinochet" and
    murderously pursued opponents for nearly a decade.

    In 1990, Mr. Habré was chased out by an armed faction led by Chad's
    current president, Idriss Déby. Now Mr. Déby is facing his own
    rebellion.

    Americans might dismiss this numbing cycle of coups as esoteric
    history belonging to a troubled and distant country. They
    shouldn't. The C.I.A. armed Mr. Habré for years, and since 2003,
    the United States military has been training and equipping
    Mr. Déby's army, making his fight to stay in office our fight, too.

    Last year, Chad took part in a vast, international military exercise
    organized by the United States - the largest exercise of its kind in
    Africa since World War II, according to the Defense Department. This
    summer, American forces will continue to advise Chadian soldiers, and
    Congress is expected to allocate $500 million for a five-year program
    to train and equip several Saharan armies - including Mr. Déby's.

    The military hopes these initiatives will help contain the threat of
    terrorism by bringing order to the Great Desert and its
    borderlands. For centuries, the Sahara has been a lawless realm, and
    with millions of Muslims living across the region in isolated
    communities, counterterrorism officials fear that Islamic militants
    may seek sanctuary there.

    But dispensing military aid to Chad now - with Mr. Déby fighting
    hundreds of rebels backed by Sudan - seems reckless. It puts American
    military equipment and expertise in the hands of a desperate
    dictator. Worse still, it risks pouring additional fuel into the human
    furnace of Darfur, and it may well come to impede the careful
    diplomatic work required to solve that crisis.

    So far, American officials have made much of Sudanese assistance to
    the rebels, framing the recent conflict in Chad as an outgrowth of the
    tragedy in Darfur. There is some truth to this. But the violence in
    Chad also has its own political narrative. During his 16 years in
    power, Mr. Déby has ruled Chad brutally. His security forces have
    committed torture, rapes, summary executions and mass killings.

    Mr. Déby is a member of the Zaghawa - a northern tribe making up
    roughly 5 percent of Chad's population - and last year the State
    Department described his regime as a Zaghawa oligarchy shielded by a
    security and intelligence apparatus that violates human rights with
    impunity. In 2004, Mr. Déby altered Chad's Constitution to grant
    himself another term in office. Elections are scheduled for next
    Wednesday. There is little likelihood they will be fair.

    Only one compelling argument exists for giving Chad military aid, and
    it follows from the logic of lesser evils. Many of the refugees
    fleeing Darfur are Zaghawa, and Mr. Déby has taken them in. If his
    regime collapses, tens of thousands of people will once again be at
    the mercy of Sudan's janjaweed marauders, and the genocide may spread.

    This argument, though, is complicated by another unsettling
    development. In recent months, scores of Chadian soldiers have
    defected to the rebel militias. If the defections continue, they raise
    the horrific possibility that American military equipment and
    expertise could end up going to men aligned with the janjaweed. In
    that case, our military assistance to Chad, far from containing
    political anarchy, would only add to it.

    Raffi Khatchadourian traveled to Chad in 2005 for the International
    Reporting Project at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced
    International Studies.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/opinio n/28khatchadourian.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Working...
X