Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Israel and Azerbaijan's Furtive Embrace

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Israel and Azerbaijan's Furtive Embrace

    ISRAEL AND AZERBAIJAN'S FURTIVE EMBRACE

    PipeLineNews.org, CA
    Aug 6, 2006

    by Ilya Bourtman

    August 7, 2006 - Washington, DC - PipeLineNews.org via Middle East
    Forum - The disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 changed
    the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. Within weeks,
    six predominantly Muslim countries along the southern rim of the
    Soviet Union gained independence. Israel, along with Turkey, Iran,
    and various Arab states, rushed to establish embassies in capitals
    ranging from Ashgabat to Tashkent. While Jerusalem maintains good
    working relations with these newly independent states, few could have
    foreseen how Israel's relationship with Azerbaijan would blossom. The
    two countries formally established relations in April 1992, one year
    after Azerbaijan declared its independence. The idea that a country
    93 percent Muslim would cooperate closely with Israeli intelligence,
    and even provide Israeli officials a defensive platform in such a
    volatile region, was hardly considered. Yet, Jerusalem and Baku have
    quietly become strategic partners-sharing intelligence, developing
    trade relations, and together building regional alliances. Although the
    Israel-Azerbaijan partnership has had important regional implications,
    uncertainty remains how far Azerbaijani elites are willing to pursue
    ties.

    A Convergence of Interests

    While the mutual relationship has not been a priority for either
    Israel or Azerbaijan, both Jerusalem and Baku have expanded their
    ties in response to the realization that policy coordination best
    protects Caspian security and counters Iranian expansionism. Both
    Israel and Azerbaijan face challenges to their legitimacy if not
    their very existence. Both share a sense of trial by fire after
    winning independence only after a territorial war with neighbors.

    While Israel had to face down five invading Arab armies upon its
    independence and remains in a technical state of war with Syria,
    Lebanon, and Iraq, Azerbaijan remains embroiled in a decade-long
    military conflict with Armenia over the mountainous enclave of
    Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijani territory occupied by an Armenian army.

    Indeed, unproven rumors persist in the Arabic-language press and
    pro-Saudi journals suggesting Israeli arms exports to Azerbaijan may
    have even preceded formal Azerbaijani independence.

    Insecurity complexes born of war and siege cause both Jerusalem and
    Baku to see the region through similar prisms. Both countries grapple
    with identity problems: how can Azerbaijan be "the Azeri state"
    when close to 20 million Azeris-almost twice its population-live
    in neighboring Iran? Indeed, Iranian Supreme Leader 'Ali Khamene'i
    is an ethnic Azeri. Israel, meanwhile, grapples both to define its
    relationship to the Jewish diaspora and to its own sizable Arab
    minority.

    The Israeli government reached out to Azerbaijan for a number
    of reasons. Israeli policymakers, like their Arab and Iranian
    counterparts, viewed Azerbaijan and the Caspian littoral as part
    of the "Greater Middle East." Expanding its influence into an area
    of the world heavily Muslim but not Arab has long been a strategic
    Israeli objective. After all, prior to the revolution in 1979,
    Israel had sold weapons to the Iranian army and considered the shah
    a friend. Similarly, since the early 1990s, Israel has reached out
    to Turkey. New allies could also lead to new economic opportunities,
    greater energy security, and, it was hoped, extra U.N. votes. Israel
    aimed to exploit the region's energy resources by lobbying for the
    development of gas and oil pipelines that would help its allies and
    circumvent its foes. Finally, Israeli officials hoped that direct
    ties would facilitate the immigration of Azerbaijan's 20,000-strong
    Jewish community to Israel.

    The Azerbaijani government, meanwhile, found itself cooperating with
    Israel both out of respect for the Jewish state and because of lack
    of an alternative. In 1991, Azerbaijan was economically fragile,
    politically unstable, and militarily weak. Desperate for outside
    assistance, Baku turned to Israel to provide leverage against a much
    stronger Iran and a militarily superior Armenia. Israel promised
    to improve Azerbaijan's weak economy by developing trade ties. It
    purchased Azerbaijani oil and gas and sent medical, technological,
    and agricultural experts. Most importantly for Azerbaijan, Israel's
    foreign ministry vowed to lend its lobby's weight in Washington
    to improve Azeri-American relations, providing a counterweight to
    the influential Armenian lobby. According to Azerbaijan's first
    president, Abulfas Elcibey, "Israel could help Azerbaijan in [the]
    Karabakh problem by convincing the Americans to stop the Armenians."

    Azerbaijani diplomats recognized the need to diversify their contacts
    in Washington, especially after the U.S. Congress imposed sanctions on
    Azerbaijan at the behest of the Armenian lobby following the war in
    Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijani military officials also believed that
    Israeli firms could better equip the ragtag Azerbaijani army, which
    needed new weapons following its defeat in Nagorno-Karabakh. On several
    occasions, Heydar Aliyev, Azerbaijan's president between 1993 and 2003,
    personally requested military assistance from Israeli prime ministers.

    http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm? page=bourtman8706.htm
Working...
X