Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Controversial Berlin exhibition sparks Polish ire

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Controversial Berlin exhibition sparks Polish ire

    Deutsche Presse-Agentur
    August 18, 2006 Friday 2:05 AM EST

    Controversial Berlin exhibition sparks Polish ire =

    Clive Freeman, dpa

    DPA CULTURE, ENTERTAINMENT Germany Culture Poland FEATURE:
    Controversial Berlin exhibition sparks Polish ire = Clive Freeman,
    dpa Berlin

    Wilfried Rogasch stands in the foyer of Berlin's Kronprinzenpalais
    shaking his head in disbelief at the hostile reactions in Poland to
    the exhibition he has organised.

    It depicts the plight of millions of European refugees, among them
    many Germans, who either fled or were expelled from their homes at
    the end of World War II.

    When it opened last Thursday, the Polish government and a large
    section of the Polish media were quick to criticise it. Warsaw's
    mayor Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz even cancelled plans to visit Berlin.

    Rogasch told Deutsche Presse-Agentur, dpa, he was surprised by the
    "hysterical reaction" in Poland. "Even without seeing the contents of

    the show the Polish premier, foreign minister and culture minister
    had decided it was, anti-Polish," he said.

    At the heart of the current dispute is a campaign spearheaded by German
    expellee groups aimed at creating a centre in Berlin remembering the
    mass expulsions of 12-14 million ethnic Germans from several countries
    of Eastern Europe after World War 11.

    Rogasch frankly concedes that the Berlin exhibition, which lasts for
    three months, is the "first step towards a permanent documentation
    centre here in Berlin."

    There has been a fiery debate over such plans, with German Nobel
    Literature Prize winner Guenter Grass - himself now in the news over
    his admission he was a teenage member of the wartime Waffen SS -
    warning three years ago that the creation of a centre in Berlin would

    open old wounds with Germany's eastern neighbours.

    As a result of the controversy caused by the current exhibition,
    Rogasch said he had returned several exhibition art loans back to
    Poland in order, as he put it, to "avoid curators there any possible
    embarrassment."

    He added: "It was my decision. They did not ask that l should do
    so. So, yes, I am disappointed. I saw myself as a bridge-builder
    between Germany and Poland, not as a trouble-maker."

    The curator also praised several Polish museums for "standing firm"
    during a trying period.

    "Pressure has been put on these institutions by the (Polish)
    government, and by a large proportion of the Polish press," he claimed.

    "I find this quite outrageous in a country which belongs to the
    European Union, and in which scientific and cultural institutions
    should be independent of the prevailing government.

    "We are all members of the International Council of Museums, which
    is a part of UNESCO. As such, museums should be able to decide freely

    with whom they co-operate and to whom they send loans.

    "No sitting government has a right to put pressure on these
    institutions, which has been the case in a way I never would have
    expected," he added, with irritation.

    Rogasch says while the Berlin exhibition involves the fate of 12-
    14 million German refugees who either fled or were ousted from their
    homes in Poland, Czechoslovakia and several other countries in eastern
    Europe after World War II, it also clearly defines the traumatic
    experiences of millions of other expellees from other countries.

    Entitled "Forced Paths - Flight and Expulsion in Europe During the
    20th Century", the exhibition fills three rooms of the newly revamped

    Palais building on the Unten den Linden.

    In the biggest hall, nine mass expulsion episodes get pin-pointed,
    ranging from the Armenian massacres in 1915 to the German persecution

    of the Jews between 1933-45, and the ethnic cleansing terror in
    Bosnia-Herzegovina in the early 1990s.

    Supporters of the centre, like German Expellees' leader Erika
    Steinbach, who is a conservative (CDU) deputy, argue that it would
    serve as a warning against future expulsions.

    To its advocates, the centre is deemed a natural development, an
    effort to remember and understand an often forgotten fact: That, in
    the two years after Germany's World War II defeat in 1945, millions
    of ethnic Germans were forced to leave countries where they and their

    ancestors had lived in some cases for centuries, and resettle in
    Germany itself.

    But in Poland, such talk provokes considerable uneasiness. Most
    critics in Poland worry the planned Berlin centre could be misused by

    historical revisionists to marginalise or cast aside Nazi Germany's
    responsibility for the colossal civilian suffering which occurred
    during the Second World War.

    Wladslaw Bartoszewski, an Auschwitz survivor and former Polish foreign
    minister argues that if a centre is created then it should be

    located in Wroclaw, which prior to World War II was for hundreds of
    years the German city of Breslau.

    Wroclaw was almost entirely destroyed during the war, when it was
    bombarded and eventually over-run by Soviet troops after a desperate
    14 week German defence that lasted until four days after the fall of
    Berlin in the spring of 1945.

    Subsequently it became a classic "refugee city." Those who settled in
    Wroclaw after the war were Polish refugees from the eastern city of
    Lvov, which at the end of World War II became Soviet Ukraine's Lviv,
    where mainly ethnic Ukrainians resettled.

    Rogasch, who has made numerous visits to museums in Poland in recent
    years for talks with fellow curators, insists that Germany has

    since the 1939-45 conflict worked painstakingly at documenting the
    "outrageous criminal aspects of Germanys history."

    "Now," he says, "this country has every right to focus on groups
    whose German members were also victims 60 years ago. Now they are
    in their 70s or 80s. Then, they were children. So they would neither
    have voted for Hitler or known anything about the concentration camps."

    "We cannot deny such groups their personal right to remember that
    they were victims - victims of Nazi dictatorship and also of Stalinist
    expansionism," says Rogasch.

    Aug 1806 0205 GMT
Working...
X