Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TBILISI: Will GUAM Peacekeepers Replace Russians?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TBILISI: Will GUAM Peacekeepers Replace Russians?

    WILL GUAM PEACEKEEPERS REPLACE RUSSIANS?

    The Messenger, Georgia
    Aug. 23, 2006

    With the Georgian leadership pushing to sideline Russian peacekeepers
    in the conflict zones, questions have arisen as to just who could step
    in as a substitution force. The US openly supports the withdrawal of
    Russian peacekeepers, calling for the introduction of an international
    force in their stead.

    However, finding a replacement for the Russian peacekeepers, let
    alone convincing Moscow to withdraw, is not a simple task. There are
    500 Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia, and 1600 in Abkhazia.

    Ukraine or the Baltic countries are widely viewed as possible
    substitutions for Russia, but peacekeeping tasks require a substantial
    commitment of material, logistical, and human resources.

    Georgia may be hard-pressed to convince states without a strategic
    national interest in the region to take on those responsibilities.

    There is another, increasingly popular, option: GUAM. The organization
    of Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova, created in 1997 to
    counterbalance Russian influence in the region, met in June to
    discuss the creation of a united peacekeeper battalion. The once
    moribund alliance, reenergized by the 'color revolutions' and Western
    encouragement, have strong motivation to establish a joint peacekeeping
    force-three out of four of the member-states have unresolved conflicts
    on their territories (including Nagarno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan and
    Transnistria in Moldova).

    The GUAM peacekeeping battalion could function under the aegis of
    UN, OSCE, NATO or EU-anything but CIS-mandates, participating in
    peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. GUAM summits in 2005,
    in Chisinau, and 2006, in Kiev, erected the legal framework to move
    ahead with the idea.

    There is support from experts and observers for replacing CIS (that
    is, Russian) peacekeepers with GUAM forces. Director of the Strategic
    Research Center Irakli Menagharishvili, minister of foreign affairs
    at the time of GUAM's creation, says that resolving conflicts and
    creating a joint peacekeeping contingent was a priority issue for
    the alliance from the get-go.

    According to Menagharishvili, today GUAM is fit enough to take on
    this mission; of additional helpfulness is the fact that its member
    countries now have peacekeeping experience in different part of the
    world. Russia's clear failure to act as a disinterested party in the
    conflicts, he says, is a violation of international norms.

    Georgia is already taking some modest steps to subtract Russia from
    the peacekeeping equation. Recently, on Tbilisi's demand, Russian
    peacekeepers were left out of the monitoring group assembled to
    observe the situation in the Kodori Gorge.

    Foreign Minister Gela Bezhuashvili has pushed forth with other
    substantial demands, including an insistence that in addition to
    monitoring of the Georgian-controlled upper Kodori Gorge, observers
    should be placed in the Abkhaz-controlled lower part. Additionally,
    Tbilisi has long made noise over the former Russian military base in
    Gudauta; theoretically, it is completely dismantled by now, but the
    Russians, claiming that the Abkhaz authorities won't allow inspections,
    haven't let observers ascertain that for themselves.

    And now, perhaps skittish over this increased talk of a withdrawal of
    Russian peacekeeping forces from the conflict zone, Abkhaz separatist
    authorities are explicitly threatening military reprisals should
    the Abkhazian government-in-exile be resituated in the Kodori Gorge
    as planned by Saakashvili's administration. Far from dampening the
    martial rhetoric, Moscow has added its voice to the chorus, saying it
    'shares the concern' of the Abkhazian de facto government.

    Still, Abkhaz separatist leadership is dissatisfied with Russian
    conduct; they want their northern patron to bare its teeth against
    Georgia. The entry of Georgian 'police forces' into the gorge was a
    perceived blow to their security, and in their minds a preventable
    one should Moscow have more forcefully intervened.

    With Abkhazia feverishly convinced that a Georgian attack is imminent,
    calls for Russian peacekeeper withdrawal predictably meet with howls
    of protest. Finding an independent body willing to step into that
    maelstrom will take some doing.
Working...
X