Tweet
THE STATUE OF LIBERTY BELONGS IN SYRIA
By Gabe Huck
National Catholic Reporter
Aug. 30, 2006
Mideast refugees find a home and haven in an unexpected place
We came back from 10 months in Damascus in mid-June and plan to
return to Syria early in September. When we speak about Syria with
small groups in homes or churches here these days, my wife always
makes a suggestion: Let's start a movement to tow the Statue of
Liberty from the harbor in New York City to Syria's Mediterranean
seaport at Latakia. That's where it belongs if there's anything at
all to this business about giving over "your tired, your poor, your
huddled masses."
Just in these weeks we've been here in the United States, Syria has
again been the only place of refuge for the Lebanese whose homes
and jobs have been destroyed and whose lives have been endangered by
Israel's air strikes. Even though Israel bombed the roads and bridges
that connect Beirut and Damascus, killing many, still hundreds of
thousands of Lebanese have gotten to the border. Did Syria have a
homeland security department there to decide who got in and who did
not? Did the refugees pass through any metal detector? I would be
surprised if anyone even asked them to put their meager baggage on
an x-ray belt.
Instead they probably heard: "Ahlan ou sahalan!" You are welcome! It
comes naturally to the lips of Syrians.
We have heard from friends in Damascus that public schools and other
institutions are being used to house these refugees. We have heard that
President Bashar al-Assad has asked households to open their doors
and give sanctuary to the stranger. One U.S. journalist suggested
this was a public relations move on Syria's part. Some move. The
United States should hire that PR firm.
Americans should know that Syrians are good at this work of receiving
refugees. They have been practicing. If we go back a whole century,
we'll find that Armenians were taken in. In 1948 and the years
following, tens of thousands of Palestinians fleeing Israel's seizure
of their homes and farms sought and received refuge in Syria. They and
their children and their children's children are still there, unable
even to visit the land of their ancestors. The early Palestinian
camps in Damascus are now neighborhoods of four- and five-story
cinderblock apartments.
Then there are the Iraqis. As the U.S. occupation of Iraq grinds on
through its fourth year, more than half a million Iraqis have fled
to Syria and a like number to Jordan. Once again, Syria's borders
were open. Iraqi children can enroll in Syrian schools. Iraqis
can seek work in an economy that already has much unemployment and
underemployment. Refugees do what refugees always do: find their
relatives, crowd into small apartments, find ways to earn enough
for dinner.
Syria and Jordan, two nations never mentioned among the big oil owners
of the Middle East, are the countries people go to for refuge.
Jordan, a U.S. ally, has grown stricter about who gets in and sends
some Iraqis back to Iraq. Syria has rules too, but the refugees seem
to stay on.
So who are these people who have been doing what the tall lady in
New York harbor used to do, opening that door? To start with, there
are only about 18 million Syrians. So go figure how many refugees the
United States would have to admit from Iraq to be in the same league
as Syria. The number comes to about 8 million, or a quarter of Iraq's
population. But few of the refugees in Amman and in Damascus even
bother to apply for a visa of any kind to the United States. They
know the odds are overwhelmingly against their receiving even a
nonimmigrant visa, let alone an immigrant visa.
But wait, what about Iraqis still in Iraq? Don't they apply at the
U.S. embassy there, now the largest embassy in the world we hear? No.
Iraqis are not allowed to apply for U.S. visas in Iraq. They must
make the dangerous journey to Amman or Damascus first. That in itself
determines that only a fraction of the Iraqis who take the Statue of
Liberty seriously ever get to apply for a U.S. visa.
And does the United States dare admit that Iraqis can be refugees at
all? What would that say about our invasion and occupation of Iraq?
But Syria, a nation somewhere near the bottom of the middle of the
heap -- a Syrian uses in an average day about one-eighth the energy
allotted an American -- still holds the gates open for Iraqis and
Lebanese. The United Nations gives some help too.
Americans today seem to have turned their back on the hospitality
they used to offer. They could do worse than to turn to Syria for
while a relatively poor country -- and certainly an imperfect one in
many respects -- Syria does a powerful amount of good to refugees in
desperate need.
By Gabe Huck
National Catholic Reporter
Aug. 30, 2006
Mideast refugees find a home and haven in an unexpected place
We came back from 10 months in Damascus in mid-June and plan to
return to Syria early in September. When we speak about Syria with
small groups in homes or churches here these days, my wife always
makes a suggestion: Let's start a movement to tow the Statue of
Liberty from the harbor in New York City to Syria's Mediterranean
seaport at Latakia. That's where it belongs if there's anything at
all to this business about giving over "your tired, your poor, your
huddled masses."
Just in these weeks we've been here in the United States, Syria has
again been the only place of refuge for the Lebanese whose homes
and jobs have been destroyed and whose lives have been endangered by
Israel's air strikes. Even though Israel bombed the roads and bridges
that connect Beirut and Damascus, killing many, still hundreds of
thousands of Lebanese have gotten to the border. Did Syria have a
homeland security department there to decide who got in and who did
not? Did the refugees pass through any metal detector? I would be
surprised if anyone even asked them to put their meager baggage on
an x-ray belt.
Instead they probably heard: "Ahlan ou sahalan!" You are welcome! It
comes naturally to the lips of Syrians.
We have heard from friends in Damascus that public schools and other
institutions are being used to house these refugees. We have heard that
President Bashar al-Assad has asked households to open their doors
and give sanctuary to the stranger. One U.S. journalist suggested
this was a public relations move on Syria's part. Some move. The
United States should hire that PR firm.
Americans should know that Syrians are good at this work of receiving
refugees. They have been practicing. If we go back a whole century,
we'll find that Armenians were taken in. In 1948 and the years
following, tens of thousands of Palestinians fleeing Israel's seizure
of their homes and farms sought and received refuge in Syria. They and
their children and their children's children are still there, unable
even to visit the land of their ancestors. The early Palestinian
camps in Damascus are now neighborhoods of four- and five-story
cinderblock apartments.
Then there are the Iraqis. As the U.S. occupation of Iraq grinds on
through its fourth year, more than half a million Iraqis have fled
to Syria and a like number to Jordan. Once again, Syria's borders
were open. Iraqi children can enroll in Syrian schools. Iraqis
can seek work in an economy that already has much unemployment and
underemployment. Refugees do what refugees always do: find their
relatives, crowd into small apartments, find ways to earn enough
for dinner.
Syria and Jordan, two nations never mentioned among the big oil owners
of the Middle East, are the countries people go to for refuge.
Jordan, a U.S. ally, has grown stricter about who gets in and sends
some Iraqis back to Iraq. Syria has rules too, but the refugees seem
to stay on.
So who are these people who have been doing what the tall lady in
New York harbor used to do, opening that door? To start with, there
are only about 18 million Syrians. So go figure how many refugees the
United States would have to admit from Iraq to be in the same league
as Syria. The number comes to about 8 million, or a quarter of Iraq's
population. But few of the refugees in Amman and in Damascus even
bother to apply for a visa of any kind to the United States. They
know the odds are overwhelmingly against their receiving even a
nonimmigrant visa, let alone an immigrant visa.
But wait, what about Iraqis still in Iraq? Don't they apply at the
U.S. embassy there, now the largest embassy in the world we hear? No.
Iraqis are not allowed to apply for U.S. visas in Iraq. They must
make the dangerous journey to Amman or Damascus first. That in itself
determines that only a fraction of the Iraqis who take the Statue of
Liberty seriously ever get to apply for a U.S. visa.
And does the United States dare admit that Iraqis can be refugees at
all? What would that say about our invasion and occupation of Iraq?
But Syria, a nation somewhere near the bottom of the middle of the
heap -- a Syrian uses in an average day about one-eighth the energy
allotted an American -- still holds the gates open for Iraqis and
Lebanese. The United Nations gives some help too.
Americans today seem to have turned their back on the hospitality
they used to offer. They could do worse than to turn to Syria for
while a relatively poor country -- and certainly an imperfect one in
many respects -- Syria does a powerful amount of good to refugees in
desperate need.