Tweet
MARK ZORYAN: ARE THEY SACRIFICING JAVAKH FOR THE GREAT GOAL?
Regnum, Russia
Nov 30 2006
The struggle for the international recognition of the Armenian
Genocide of 1915 is actually an expression of national idea for the
Armenian people. This idea is not subject to rational analysis, and,
even though the Armenians say that they seek just moral compensation,
they will certainly not forget their lost Homeland - Western Armenia
- and firmly believe that they can restore Armenian statehood over
4/5 of their historical territory. Even strong as it is, the idea
of Nagorno-Karabakh (Armenians call it Artsakh) has failed to push
back the problem of the Armenian Genocide and its international
recognition. The Armenians just sneer at the hopes of some politicians
that they may give up this political struggle.
Even though many states have recognized the Armenian Genocide and the
number of such states is growing every year, the major obstacle to
the final goal is the US, whose officials are constantly maneuvering
in the matter. In fact, the US is the only state who has worked out a
program of the Armenian Genocide recognition, but it would be native
to think that a state like the US will solve this problem by just
one presidential signature (that would be a banal and useless action).
The US administration is acting consistently: they are waiting
until the Armenian Genocide is acknowledged by the American society,
by civil, religious and ethnic organizations, by all 50 states with
their legislative bodies and governors and, finally, by both houses
of the Congress. This will make the President's signature a kind of
forced action: after all, the President can't disregard the opinion
of the whole American society, can he? By the way, the Armenian NGOs
are beginning to play just a consultative role in the growing campaign
for the Genocide recognition. In some states the Armenian lobby acted
just formally but still the states recognized the Genocide. That is,
things have got underway and the key tasks are fulfilled. Democrat
Nancy Pelosy has been elected Speaker of the House of Representatives
and she says that the Armenian Genocide may be recognized as early
as Apr 24 2007.
Irrespective of the wish of the influential political circles of the
US, the process of the Armenian Genocide international recognition
has become an element of the US' foreign policy, and even the most
radical opponents have already begun thinking how to use this tendency
in their own interests. At the same time, this reality concerns not
only the US' policy on Turkey but also on Armenia.
This situation is quite convenient for building relations with
Armenia. In the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, the Americans see
absolutely no sense or profit in offering something in exchange for
the recognition of the Genocide. But there is also the problem of
Samtskhe-Javakheti, a Georgian province with over 50% Armenian majority
(the region Armenians call Javakh). In that province, despite all their
democratic commitments, the Georgian authorities have not yet solved
even elementary cultural-educational and linguistic-educational
problems. The prospects of the local self-government are also
unclear. Having allocated over $104mln for road recovery, the US has
seen that the Georgian authorities are not going to restore the 25
km road connecting the Javakh administrative centers with Armenia.
The US has seen the gist of Georgia's policy in its ethnic regions
but prefers not to make a row about it so as not to give trumps to
Russia. The European community is acting in almost the same way.
Still, both the Americans and the Europeans have seen the risks of
Georgia's uncontrolled policy in 2006 and have decided not to risk
any further and have put a strong veto on that country's foreign and
domestic policies.
In their efforts to curb the social-political movement in Javakh, the
Americans are actively cooperating with the local Armenian political
forces and NGOs and the authorities of Armenia. The Americans perfectly
understand that the key developments in Javakh have nothing to do with
the stories they push forward, i.e. to the Russian special services
or certain ambitions of the Armenian nationalist organizations,
even though some of them, particularly, the ARF Dashnaktsutiun,
have a strong ramified network in the province - a force that can
solve many problems both in cooperation with the Georgian political
parties and authorities and quite independently.
Presently, Dashnaktsutiun is the best organized party in the territory
of Georgia, much better organized than any Georgian party.
Their goal is to pave the way for partnership with the Georgian
political leadership; the only question is what kind of leadership
it will be. Considering the fact that the ARFD is a ruling party in
Armenia, the Americans prefer to work with the Dashnak organizations in
the US (simply they are closer). That's why the Dashnak organization
in Javakh preferred to keep silence in the conflict situation over
the last local elections in the province.
Even more, they almost supported the "Georgian party," that is, it was
a professionally coordinated political operation that has made Javakh
a part of the big politics and a political resource for a number of
projects. What we are witnessing is a very sophisticated game and
it seems that somebody is eager to turn this backwater district into
the crossroads of various interests. What consequences will this game
have for this ethnic region?
Mark Zoryan - expert of the Caucasus analytical center
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Regnum, Russia
Nov 30 2006
The struggle for the international recognition of the Armenian
Genocide of 1915 is actually an expression of national idea for the
Armenian people. This idea is not subject to rational analysis, and,
even though the Armenians say that they seek just moral compensation,
they will certainly not forget their lost Homeland - Western Armenia
- and firmly believe that they can restore Armenian statehood over
4/5 of their historical territory. Even strong as it is, the idea
of Nagorno-Karabakh (Armenians call it Artsakh) has failed to push
back the problem of the Armenian Genocide and its international
recognition. The Armenians just sneer at the hopes of some politicians
that they may give up this political struggle.
Even though many states have recognized the Armenian Genocide and the
number of such states is growing every year, the major obstacle to
the final goal is the US, whose officials are constantly maneuvering
in the matter. In fact, the US is the only state who has worked out a
program of the Armenian Genocide recognition, but it would be native
to think that a state like the US will solve this problem by just
one presidential signature (that would be a banal and useless action).
The US administration is acting consistently: they are waiting
until the Armenian Genocide is acknowledged by the American society,
by civil, religious and ethnic organizations, by all 50 states with
their legislative bodies and governors and, finally, by both houses
of the Congress. This will make the President's signature a kind of
forced action: after all, the President can't disregard the opinion
of the whole American society, can he? By the way, the Armenian NGOs
are beginning to play just a consultative role in the growing campaign
for the Genocide recognition. In some states the Armenian lobby acted
just formally but still the states recognized the Genocide. That is,
things have got underway and the key tasks are fulfilled. Democrat
Nancy Pelosy has been elected Speaker of the House of Representatives
and she says that the Armenian Genocide may be recognized as early
as Apr 24 2007.
Irrespective of the wish of the influential political circles of the
US, the process of the Armenian Genocide international recognition
has become an element of the US' foreign policy, and even the most
radical opponents have already begun thinking how to use this tendency
in their own interests. At the same time, this reality concerns not
only the US' policy on Turkey but also on Armenia.
This situation is quite convenient for building relations with
Armenia. In the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, the Americans see
absolutely no sense or profit in offering something in exchange for
the recognition of the Genocide. But there is also the problem of
Samtskhe-Javakheti, a Georgian province with over 50% Armenian majority
(the region Armenians call Javakh). In that province, despite all their
democratic commitments, the Georgian authorities have not yet solved
even elementary cultural-educational and linguistic-educational
problems. The prospects of the local self-government are also
unclear. Having allocated over $104mln for road recovery, the US has
seen that the Georgian authorities are not going to restore the 25
km road connecting the Javakh administrative centers with Armenia.
The US has seen the gist of Georgia's policy in its ethnic regions
but prefers not to make a row about it so as not to give trumps to
Russia. The European community is acting in almost the same way.
Still, both the Americans and the Europeans have seen the risks of
Georgia's uncontrolled policy in 2006 and have decided not to risk
any further and have put a strong veto on that country's foreign and
domestic policies.
In their efforts to curb the social-political movement in Javakh, the
Americans are actively cooperating with the local Armenian political
forces and NGOs and the authorities of Armenia. The Americans perfectly
understand that the key developments in Javakh have nothing to do with
the stories they push forward, i.e. to the Russian special services
or certain ambitions of the Armenian nationalist organizations,
even though some of them, particularly, the ARF Dashnaktsutiun,
have a strong ramified network in the province - a force that can
solve many problems both in cooperation with the Georgian political
parties and authorities and quite independently.
Presently, Dashnaktsutiun is the best organized party in the territory
of Georgia, much better organized than any Georgian party.
Their goal is to pave the way for partnership with the Georgian
political leadership; the only question is what kind of leadership
it will be. Considering the fact that the ARFD is a ruling party in
Armenia, the Americans prefer to work with the Dashnak organizations in
the US (simply they are closer). That's why the Dashnak organization
in Javakh preferred to keep silence in the conflict situation over
the last local elections in the province.
Even more, they almost supported the "Georgian party," that is, it was
a professionally coordinated political operation that has made Javakh
a part of the big politics and a political resource for a number of
projects. What we are witnessing is a very sophisticated game and
it seems that somebody is eager to turn this backwater district into
the crossroads of various interests. What consequences will this game
have for this ethnic region?
Mark Zoryan - expert of the Caucasus analytical center
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress