Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Two Sides To The Story: Nagorno-Karabakh Features Both A Thriving Re

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Two Sides To The Story: Nagorno-Karabakh Features Both A Thriving Re

    TWO SIDES TO THE STORY: NAGORNO-KARABAKH FEATURES BOTH A THRIVING REGIONAL CENTER AND GHOST TOWNS
    By Shaun Walker

    Russia Profile, Russia
    Dec 12 2006

    STEPANAKERT, Nagorno-Karabakh. As we approached the Karabakh military
    post, I felt a vibration in my pocket. "Azercell welcomes you to
    Azerbaijan," said the message on my cell phone. Indeed, we were several
    kilometers inside Azerbaijan proper, but standing on territory where no
    Azeri has walked for over a decade. When the Nagorno-Karabakh region
    - which was an autonomous territory inside the Soviet republic of
    Azerbaijan - declared full independence from its parent state after
    a bloody war in the early 1990s, a further 9 percent of Azerbaijan's
    territory was also occupied to act as a buffer zone of defense.

    Our exact location remained unclear. "It's secret information," said
    the guide from the Karabakh foreign ministry. "Maybe the enemy will
    read your material." We had come along the road from Karabakh's capital
    Stepanakert, past the deserted shells of Azeri villages strewn across
    the arid, monochromic landscape. We were well outside the official
    territory of the Karabakh republic, possibly somewhere near Aghdam,
    formerly a thriving Azeri city with 50,000 inhabitants, but now a
    sea of rubble; only the mosque remained standing.

    The soldiers at the post did their best to look upbeat, but it was
    clear that theirs was a miserable task. In the bitter cold, they
    surreptitiously breathed warmth onto their gloveless hands when they
    thought no one was looking. Mice scuttled across the floor in the
    unheated barracks, and the trench dug into the muddy ground was more
    reminiscent of First World War than 21st century.

    The Azeri front line was just 600 feet away, visible from a command
    post through binoculars. "We do have occasional exchanges of fire,"
    said the officer in charge of the post, a tanned giant with a crude
    heart tattoo on his hand and a face etched with years of conflict. "A
    week ago one of our men was shot in the head by a sniper at the next
    post down," he added.

    A timid boy of 18 quietly mumbled answers to the questions of a young
    Russian television reporter about the living conditions. "He doesn't
    see many beautiful women, so he's shy," chirped the foreign ministry
    official. "Maybe the American army is all about posing, but this army
    is here to defend its motherland."

    The motherland in question is the odd-one-out of the post-Soviet
    breakaway zones. Over the years of its de facto independence,
    Nagorno-Karabakh has developed many of the institutions of
    a functioning state, and is more likely than the other three
    (Transdniestr, South Ossetia and Abkhazia) to gain some kind of
    official independent status in the medium-term future.

    There are two key reasons for this: first of all, the fact that
    Russia, while most certainly an interested party, is not a defining
    player in this conflict, meaning that the West would not see Karabakh
    independence as a strategic gain for Russia; and secondly, the presence
    of an influential and vocal Armenian Diaspora to lobby for the state
    on the international stage. Calls from Washington and Brussels to
    preserve Azerbaijan's territorial integrity are far more muted than
    those demanding that Georgia's remain intact.

    While Russia is accused of "meddling" in the other three breakaway
    zones - providing financial and military support to segments of land
    that officially are part of another state - Armenia's "meddling" in
    Karabakh is of a different type altogether. While Karabakh claims to
    be a separate country, there is no border post, and people come and
    go freely. Armenia contributes around half of Karabakh's budget and
    trains the army, making it far more than just a friendly ally.

    At the consulate in Yerevan, travelers can obtain a brightly colored
    Karabakh visa, although no one will check it, and the officials
    seem more intent on offering maps, hotel rooms, and taxi rides to
    Stepanakert than investigating the purpose of the trip.

    Karabakh does not directly border Armenia, but is connected by a small
    area of occupied Azerbaijani territory known as the Lachin Corridor,
    where the switchback road from Yerevan to Stepanakert reaches a height
    of 2,600 meters. The road itself is symbolic of the support that
    Karabakh has not only from Armenia, but from its Diaspora - despite
    the isolation of Stepanakert, hundreds of kilometers from any airport,
    the road to Yerevan was a multi-million dollar project completed just
    a few years ago. It was financed by a Diaspora foundation, and halved
    the journey time to Yerevan.

    Another Referendum

    But despite the fact that Karabakh feels like a province of Armenia,
    local officials talk of nothing but full independence. On Dec. 10,
    the republic held a referendum on a new constitution, affirming its
    existence as an independent state, and repeating the independence
    referendum held in 1991, when the war was raging. It was the final
    act in a flurry of breakaway state referendums that year, giving the
    people of Karabakh the same chance to assert their independence as
    the residents of Transdniestr and South Ossetia had in the fall.

    "The children of those who voted for independence in 1991 have
    reaffirmed that desire," said Karabakh President Arkady Ghoukasian
    after casting his vote. "We have managed to create a state and to
    resurrect the hope we had at the beginning. Any other route except
    independence is a route to war."

    Negotiations to find a solution to the conflict, which are conducted
    bilaterally between Armenia and Azerbaijan without representatives
    from Karabakh itself, have so far come to nothing, including earlier
    this year at Rambouillet, and again in Minsk, when the two presidents
    met and many analysts predicted a major breakthrough. There is a fear
    in Stepanakert, reinforced by frequent bellicose announcements by
    Azeri officials, that Azerbaijan is biding its time before waiting
    to launch a military offensive to recover the lost territory. "The
    Azeris are becoming richer, buying weapons, and preparing for war,"
    said Masis Mayilian, Karabakh's deputy foreign minister. "But we are
    ready for it."

    There seems to be little appetite for further conflict, however,
    and even the referendum itself was ignored not only by most of the
    international press, but by the citizens themselves. Although there
    was clearly some activity at the polling stations, the general apathy
    encountered among a sample of people at Stepanakert's central market
    suggested that the official figure of an 87 percent turnout (with
    98.5 percent voting in favor) might have been somewhat exaggerated.

    Regeneration and Destruction

    Stepanakert itself bears few scars of conflict, and is a pleasant -
    if architecturally unappealing - provincial city. Although everyone
    has war stories of lost friends, children taken away before their
    time and careers interrupted, the locals are on the whole upbeat and
    friendly, and there are far more shops, cafes and restaurants than
    one would expect from such a backwater.

    Despite the fact that the enclave is now almost exclusively populated
    by ethnic Armenians, Russian is everywhere, and the locals speak it
    more readily than in Yerevan - testament to the cosmopolitan past of
    the region, when Russian was the lingua franca.

    But Stepanakert is a new city. A few decades ago, it was a mere
    village. Nowhere tells the story of Karabakh better than Shushi (in
    Azeri, Shusha), a town just a few miles from Stepanakert that was
    once the capital of Karabakh, and for many decades a regional center,
    famed for its curative mountain air and sanatoria. The Armenian part
    of town was razed by Azeris and Turks in 1920, and by the 1980s,
    the vast majority of the town's inhabitants were Azeri. During the
    war, it was an Azeri stronghold, before the Armenians took it in June
    1992. The Azeris were driven out, and Shusha now lies in ruins. In his
    book Black Garden, Thomas de Waal writes that the Azeri residents now
    live in a makeshift town on the coast north of Baku - Shusha in exile.

    A bright sign on a ruined building in the central square proclaims
    that: "This is historical Armenian territory; we will never give it
    up to anyone." Some of the apartments have been inhabited by Armenian
    refugees from Baku, making the best of what remains of the town. The
    population now is estimated at around 3,000, a shadow of the 14,000
    that lived there before the war. But the strategic importance of
    Shushi (the Azeris shelled Stepanakert from the ridge above the town
    during the war) means that the return of Azeri refugees any time soon
    is unlikely.

    A beautiful, rose-pink facade stands on one of the main streets, with
    nothing behind it but rubble and a view over the mountains. Once,
    it was a hospital; now it stands forlorn, looted for anything of
    value, right down to the star in its Soviet crest. The slogan over
    the main door, in Cyrillic Azeri, has been whitewashed out, an empty
    head-shaped space above it, where the incumbent (Lenin, perhaps)
    has been unceremoniously removed.

    The expansive Persian marketplace still has four walls and some ornate
    carvings, but no roof and empty holes where there were once windows
    - in another city it might be an ultra-chic architectural project;
    here it is a reminder of what has been lost. The 1883 mosque remains
    intact from the exterior, its handsome minarets still standing, but the
    inside is open to the elements and strewn with rubble. From the top
    of the minaret, the view across the hills reveals Karabakh's Grozny:
    everywhere, the empty shells of apartment blocks and sanatoria. The
    nineteenth century Ghazanchetzots Cathedral has been restored, but
    for all intents and purposes Shushi is a ghost town, and looks set
    to remain so for some time.

    But Shushi is far from the most depressing reminder of the war.

    Fizuli, halfway between Stepanakert and the border with Iran, was
    captured by the Armenians in summer 1993, and completely razed. A
    sizeable town that stretched over several square miles, it is now
    simply a pile of stone and rubble, with only the occasional structure
    rising above a few feet. Like an ancient ruin, it was a guessing game
    to work out what had been where - the twisted shell of a bus stop;
    a contorted teardrop that must have once been a Soviet monument;
    a flight of stairs that led nowhere but the sky.

    The only life visible in the city was a small, rusting truck with a
    plume of steam coming from its rear. Its interior had been turned into
    living quarters for two Armenians, who spent their days sifting through
    the rubble for scrap metal. After more than a decade of looting, they
    were searching out the last reminders of humanity in what looked like
    a nuclear holocaust, to sell them in Yerevan.

    While its hard to see the Azeris gaining any kind of meaningful
    control over Nagorno-Karabakh, the first stage of a deal might well
    involve the return of territories like Fizuli, and a chance for the
    resettlement of some of more than half a million Azeris who lost
    their homes. But looking at the ruins of Fizuli, it is unclear just
    what they would be coming back to. It would take years for the piles
    of stones to become once again a functioning community. They served
    as yet another reminder that even if a solution is reached to the
    conflict, its scars will remain for decades to come.
Working...
X