Tweet
ARMAN BABAJANYAN'S CASE CANCELLED AGAIN
A1+
[06:38 pm] 19 December, 2006
"The Prosecutor's Office, courts and Defense Minister use other
criteria in Arman Babajanyan's case which greatly differ from other
cases. The difference is so great and apparent that we have got an
impression that it is rather retribution than a trial", Hayk Aloumyan,
Arman Babajanyan's advocate, announced in the RA Cessation Court on
Criminal and Marshal Issues today.
Mr. Aloumyan made a defending speech during the court sitting. Prior
to his speech, Hayk Aloumyan and Zarouhi Postanjyan, Babajanyan's
advocates made mediations. They pledged to cancel the court sitting by
the time the interdepartmental commission studied Arman Babajanyan's
claim but the court turned down their mediation.
Hayk Aloumyan mentioned in his speech that all courts display
discrimination. Namely, the Prosecutor's Office brought an action
on false accusation. "How dares the Prosecutor's Office to accuse
Arman Babajanyan of documents forgery when it has used and attached
false document (belonging to a non-existing "Artak Khachatryan")to
Arman Babajanyan's case ? Are they guided by the principle - the aim
justifies the means?"
The advocate claims that Babajanyan's case is not so much
complicated. "Thousands of suchlike cases have been studied and
are still being studied whereas Babajanyan's case has aroused so
much noise!"
At the end of his speech Mr. Aloumyan asked the court to dismiss the
case and cease pursuit of Mr. Babajanyan.
The court sitting was postponed till December 29.
A1+
[06:38 pm] 19 December, 2006
"The Prosecutor's Office, courts and Defense Minister use other
criteria in Arman Babajanyan's case which greatly differ from other
cases. The difference is so great and apparent that we have got an
impression that it is rather retribution than a trial", Hayk Aloumyan,
Arman Babajanyan's advocate, announced in the RA Cessation Court on
Criminal and Marshal Issues today.
Mr. Aloumyan made a defending speech during the court sitting. Prior
to his speech, Hayk Aloumyan and Zarouhi Postanjyan, Babajanyan's
advocates made mediations. They pledged to cancel the court sitting by
the time the interdepartmental commission studied Arman Babajanyan's
claim but the court turned down their mediation.
Hayk Aloumyan mentioned in his speech that all courts display
discrimination. Namely, the Prosecutor's Office brought an action
on false accusation. "How dares the Prosecutor's Office to accuse
Arman Babajanyan of documents forgery when it has used and attached
false document (belonging to a non-existing "Artak Khachatryan")to
Arman Babajanyan's case ? Are they guided by the principle - the aim
justifies the means?"
The advocate claims that Babajanyan's case is not so much
complicated. "Thousands of suchlike cases have been studied and
are still being studied whereas Babajanyan's case has aroused so
much noise!"
At the end of his speech Mr. Aloumyan asked the court to dismiss the
case and cease pursuit of Mr. Babajanyan.
The court sitting was postponed till December 29.