Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Open And Shut

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Open And Shut

    Anatolian Times, Turkey
    Dec 22 2006

    Open And Shut

    BY GUNDUZ AKTAN

    RADIKAL- The EU Commission's proposal was accepted last week and
    Turkey's membership talks were suspended in eight chapters. Thus, the
    process of our talks was slowed down. Meanwhile, EU officials and the
    press stated that the EU shouldn't close its doors to Turkey,
    otherwise the process of reform might stop. When the word 'reform' is
    mentioned, we think of the army being subject to civilian authority,
    the rights of minorities, in other words, giving collective rights to
    Kurds and Christians' religious rights. It's understood that the
    Justice and Development Party will continue membership talks under
    these conditions. In other words, we will be accepting punishment for
    a crime we supposedly committed by not fulfilling our 'obligations'
    in the Additional Protocol concerning Cyprus. As we won't be able to
    solve the Cyprus issue within the UN before 2009, we will have to
    face the issue of unilaterally opening our harbors and ports to Greek
    Cypriots. This way we'll postpone this crisis to the end of 2009.

    Our relations with the EU have been governed with a similar approach
    since the mid-'70s. We were even unable to hold Membership Council
    meetings due to Greece's obstructions since 1981, when it became a
    full member. We couldn't get the financial assistance allocated to
    us. Our 1987 application for full membership also faced similar
    obstructions. The Greek Cypriot administration applied for EU
    membership as the representative of the island in 1990. In spite of
    all our objections, it was accepted in 1993. As part of the 1995
    Customs Union decision, the EU said that if the Cyprus issue could
    not be solved by 1998, it would start full membership talks with the
    Greek Cypriot administration. And it did. This government has been
    ready to do anything with the Turkish Cypriots in order to solve the
    Cyprus issue during the process of our candidacy. Nevertheless, the
    Greek Cypriot administration became a full member and Turkey was left
    outside. The decision taken in December 2004 offered limited and
    conditional candidacy. We accepted it. The framework document of
    October 2005 invented certain obstacles which were never before
    applied to another candidate country. We made no objection. Now it
    punished us, as if insulting us. We're putting up with this.

    Every time we think, 'Let's get through this, we'll consider other
    issues later.' This policy was made by paying heavy prices such as
    being the only country which has fulfilled its obligations without
    any financial assistance and accepting the Customs Union before
    becoming a full member. However, we can never reach the goal of full
    membership which covers all the areas of our lives without a certain
    political will on the other side. The first and foremost reason for
    the EU not to have such a will is its prejudices against Turkey.
    Other objective factors also strengthen this. Signs of typical
    characteristics of a pathological prejudice can be seen in certain EU
    member countries which object to our membership. For example, the
    French nation and its leaders accuse us of certain bad aspects that
    they hate to see in themselves. They turn the genocides that they
    committed into claims that we carried out an Armenian genocide. You
    wouldn't want a target group, to which you attribute your own bad
    characteristics, to be integrated with you. Because if they make us
    an EU member, they would fear that Turkey would bring all such bad
    qualities with it. So, the fact that Turkey took the French
    Revolution as an example, similarities between the two republics and
    the importance they attach to secularism would be ignored, and they
    would believe that Turkey wouldn't be able to fulfill these goals
    like France did. On the other hand, France wouldn't want Turkey,
    which has been turned into a bin by France where it can dump its
    undesired qualities, to go too far away. It must stay next to Turkey
    and use it as a place to accuse of having faults. So, the door is
    neither completely closed, nor open for us. Turkey is in a cold,
    endless limbo, just like the soul of a dead body which is between
    heaven and hell, as in Kipling's famous poem 'Tomlinson'.

    Published: 12/22/2006
Working...
X