Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Did The Government Understand?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How Did The Government Understand?

    HOW DID THE GOVERNMENT UNDERSTAND?
    James Hakobyan

    Lragir, Armenia
    Dec 25 2006

    The intention of the government to revise the procedure of subsidizing
    gas for the industries could be considered as reasonable if the
    subsidy were not such an unreasonable step. Like the prime minister
    said several days ago, they thought the subsidy would help to keep
    the prices of products low, but the prices soared, nevertheless,
    and it aroused questions with the government. Now the government is
    likely to discuss whether the subsidy is expedient.

    This could be considered progress of the government towards economic
    thinking. In reality, however, this phenomenon reveals once again how
    void this thinking is. After seeing the consequence of this thinking
    only a hopeless fool would not realize that it is a mistake and would
    not try to correct his mistake. Meanwhile, the problem is to think
    enough before making a mistake to avoid it. And not everyone is able.

    The government gives a subsidy of several million dollars to such
    industrial giants of Armenia like the cement factories of Ararat and
    Hrazdan and then suddenly finds out that it was a mistake, and the
    price of the cement nevertheless soars. The impression is that the
    government listens to its inner voice and then finds out its mistake.

    Meanwhile, the government should first study every branch of the
    economy before granting subsidies. The tendencies of development,
    the correlation of the supply and demand, the regional developments
    should be evaluated first because the factories of cement, for
    instance, sell the bulk of their production abroad. In that case
    the government would see that in the economy nothing is absolute,
    and subsidy should not be based on the same measurement.

    There is another explanation of subsidizing which is as absurd. The
    government said that it would help the Armenian producers become
    competitive compared with the producers of Georgia and Azerbaijan
    who have to pay more for gas, and for the Armenian producers the
    price remained the same or increased. For a term of three years it
    is possible, but the price of the Russian gas will cost 110 dollars
    for this period, and the government decided to subsidize gas for this
    period. But this resembles a situation when a doctor gives a painkiller
    to the patient instead of a treatment. Meanwhile, the other patients
    are taking a treatment, and the government is not interested in what
    will happen later when the others recover, for it is only solving a
    current problem. But if they have decided to reconsider the subsidy,
    something must be happening. Maybe the reason was the appeal of the
    IMF resident representative for Armenia Nienke Oomes who advised to
    reconsider the subsidy because it is not effective. Considering the
    "deep respect" of the Armenian government for female representatives
    of the international organization, the government may have listened
    to the appeal of the IMF representative.

    But the problem is what the government understood from this appeal.

    It is possible that the current size of the subsidy is not effective
    because it is small and needs to be boosted.
Working...
X