Tweet
WHO DO OUR MINISTERS HAVE THEIR EYE ON?
Lragir.am
08 July 06
Vardan Mkrtichyan, Ardarutiun Faction, stated July 8 at the Azdak
Club that the aim of the bill on alienation of property for public
and state needs adopted by members of parliament, whose job is to
push the button, is intended to legalize illegality.
Vardan Mkrtichyan reminded that the bill was introduced to the National
Assembly not at least 24 hours before the discussion as the bylaws
provide for it, but a couple of minutes before the discussion, so the
bill was not discussed and evaluated by any parliamentary committee.
Vardan Mkrtichyan also reminded about the April 18 Decision 630 adopted
by the Constitutional Court, defining the alienation of the property of
the residents of the Center of Yerevan as unconstitutional. If before
this decision the government could say they did not know they were
violating the law, carrying on with the development of the Center
after the decision of the Constitutional Court means that "they
violate the Constitution consciously, which is a more grave offense."
By the way, speaking about the consequences of the bill, someone said,
"If they want to take away one's wife, they can put it as for the
needs of the state." A female reporter responded, "Do not give the
example of women. Our ministers do not have their eye on women. They
have their eye on one another."
Lragir.am
08 July 06
Vardan Mkrtichyan, Ardarutiun Faction, stated July 8 at the Azdak
Club that the aim of the bill on alienation of property for public
and state needs adopted by members of parliament, whose job is to
push the button, is intended to legalize illegality.
Vardan Mkrtichyan reminded that the bill was introduced to the National
Assembly not at least 24 hours before the discussion as the bylaws
provide for it, but a couple of minutes before the discussion, so the
bill was not discussed and evaluated by any parliamentary committee.
Vardan Mkrtichyan also reminded about the April 18 Decision 630 adopted
by the Constitutional Court, defining the alienation of the property of
the residents of the Center of Yerevan as unconstitutional. If before
this decision the government could say they did not know they were
violating the law, carrying on with the development of the Center
after the decision of the Constitutional Court means that "they
violate the Constitution consciously, which is a more grave offense."
By the way, speaking about the consequences of the bill, someone said,
"If they want to take away one's wife, they can put it as for the
needs of the state." A female reporter responded, "Do not give the
example of women. Our ministers do not have their eye on women. They
have their eye on one another."