Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dezinformatsiya Alive But Transparent

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dezinformatsiya Alive But Transparent

    DEZINFORMATSIYA ALIVE BUT TRANSPARENT

    Wednesday, July 19, 2006

    By Vladimir Socor

    Two forgeries now circulating in Europe and North America bear the
    classic imprint of Soviet disinformation, presented, however, in
    modern-looking packaging developed by Modest Kolerov's department of
    the presidential administration in the Kremlin.

    One of these forgeries attempts to portray Georgian President Mikheil
    Saakashvili as suffering from "psychiatric disturbances." Handed out
    discretely to Western journalists in recent weeks, this "study" is
    attributed to mental health institutes with prestigious-looking titles
    in six West European countries. However, the document is written in
    awkward English and with occasional telltale Russianisms ("convinced
    in," "diceased.") It purports to "diagnose" Saakashvili with various
    psychiatric "syndromes" and "dysfunctions" without substantiating these
    in any way, resorting instead to simple assertions and occasionally
    innuendo. Significantly, no direct claim is made that any of those
    six institutes ever examined or interviewed the Georgian president;
    instead, their "contribution to the study" is acknowledged.

    The "study's" political goals are also apparent in the forecasts it
    derives from that "diagnosis." It warns that the Georgian president
    may provoke social and military conflicts and that he tends to situate
    himself in opposition to the Georgian public.

    To lend credence to such predictions it clearly misrepresents
    Saakashvili as an insecure, "paranoid" personality; and his
    public speaking style as reflecting those alleged traits as well
    as difficulties of expression while under pressure. In reality,
    however, this Georgian president's defining message is one of
    optimism and confidence in the nation, while his speaking style
    in English and Russian makes him undoubtedly one of the most
    effective political orators in today's international arena (albeit
    one in which oratorical talent is in short supply). Even as this
    "study" was being circulated, the June meeting of Saakashvili with
    Russian President Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg saw a relaxed
    and articulate Georgian president easily dominating his stilted
    Russian counterpart throughout their lengthy joint news conference
    (see EDM, June 16). Economist correspondent Edward Lucas has
    wittily debunked the psychological "study" on his widely read blog
    (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdwardLucas).

    Concurrently with the anti-Georgian "study," a report on Transnistria
    was released apparently by the same workshop or a related one, with
    false attribution to seven highly reputed academics from leading U.S.
    and British universities. This report backs Transnistria's "right" to
    secede from Moldova and to be granted international recognition. The
    document describes Transnistria as a "democratic" polity meeting
    the criteria of state sovereignty under international law. It passes
    over in silence Russia's military and economic support that enabled
    Transnistria's secession from Moldova.

    Some parts of this report are easily recognized as having been lifted
    from an earlier report about Karabakh. Other parts are written in
    awkward English. The news agency Regnum, a Kolerov outlet (he was
    its founder and chief executive prior to his move into the Kremlin)
    first publicized this report.

    The seven purported co-authors have, in the meantime, denied any
    involvement in the preparation of the report on Transnistria and
    asked that their names be removed from the authors' roster. Some
    other scholars, whose work is referenced in the report's footnotes
    in distorted or misleading ways, have similarly asked for removal of
    those references. Indeed, most of those names have in the meantime
    disappeared the website of the organization that sponsors this report.

    The sponsoring organization, the "International Council for Democratic
    Institutions and State Sovereignty," at www.icdiss.org, was found
    to share an IP address with www.pridnestrovie.net when it posted the
    report. The reference to democratic institutions and state sovereignty
    reflects this Council's function to advocate for recognition of the
    post-Soviet secessionist enclaves. Meanwhile, that same "Council,"
    along with something called the "United Euro-Atlantic Forum," has
    released a report criticizing Ukraine's cooperation with the European
    Union in enforcing customs regulations against Transnistria's "external
    trade." Names of disinformation outlets that use misleading references
    to Western values (the "Free Europe Foundation," also propagandizing
    for recognition of the secessionist enclaves, is another case) are
    typical of Kolerov's growing network of such organizations.
Working...
X