Tweet
TO LEAVE AS A REFORMER
Margaret Yesayan
Aravot.am
09 June 06
According to Mr. Dallakian Robert Kocharian has that opportunity.
The NA deputy Victor Dallakian thinks that vulgar and narrow-minded
relations exist instead of political one in the ruling coalition in
coalition; `If political rules acted in Armenia and not vulgar rules
then it would be recorded after OEP leaving the coalition that the
coalition didn't exist any more that the Government didn't have
political majority in the National Assembly instead it had button
majority. It isn't understandable whose project nowadays authority
realizes. In my deep assurance there were two solutions from the
current situation. The solution number one, the government had to be
dismissed, a new coalition agreement should be signed and the new
government should be signed after it which would represent its
projects and the NA political majority would adopt it and only in
that case it will be possible to speak that the government has a
qualitative majority'.
But the solutions aren't limited. According to our interlocutor, there
is the second solution in case of which the National Assembly had to
be liquidated holding special elections. We noticed that all these
are already a passed stage, because nothing happened. So at what a
conclusion should we arrive? Dallakian's conclusions are the
following; `The analyze ofparliamentary elections of three republics
of Armenia shows that there is a great deficiency of holding free and
fair elections, that is, deficiency of parliamentarism. The executive
authority has formed the National Assembly since 1995 as a rule and
it is a political nonsense and is dangerous for the
country. Factually executive authority controls legislative one while
it should be the opposite'. In Victor Dallakian's opinion `market,
trade relations' have been formed today.
According to Victor Dallakian all these analyzes makes us conclude
that the current president can find himself in a profitable situation;
`Kocharian has that opportunity, especially the interest of the
outside world towards the parliamentary elections in 2007 has been
increased and they even understandin abroad that the wined powers in
parliamentary elections will be dominant during the presidential
elections in 2008. Now will be the opposite, parliamentary elections
will precede the presidential elections and each power will aspire to
get serious seats especially for achieving is goals in connection with
2008. That means mutual control will be great and in this case
Kocharian has an opportunity to be the guarantor for elections and
leave as the reformer. But it's another problem whether he will use
that opportunity'. To our question why should Robert Kocharian behave
himself in that way when it is obvious today that new-formed parties
are formed by Kocharian's approval? Victor Dallakian explained in this
way; `If it was profitable for Robert Kocharian to rig the results of
parliamentary elections in 2003 it can't be profitable for him in 2006
as he can't be nominated for the third time and in that case if he
becomes the guarantor of holding free and fair elections and powers
accepted and elected by people come to power his made mistakes can be
soothed and he will adopted as a political figure who has performed a
great mission. Anyway those powers, which will come to power in 2007,
must take into consideration Robert Kocharian till 2008. I think he
has an opportunity to use that chance and I, as a politician, consider
important to use that chance'.
Margaret Yesayan
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Margaret Yesayan
Aravot.am
09 June 06
According to Mr. Dallakian Robert Kocharian has that opportunity.
The NA deputy Victor Dallakian thinks that vulgar and narrow-minded
relations exist instead of political one in the ruling coalition in
coalition; `If political rules acted in Armenia and not vulgar rules
then it would be recorded after OEP leaving the coalition that the
coalition didn't exist any more that the Government didn't have
political majority in the National Assembly instead it had button
majority. It isn't understandable whose project nowadays authority
realizes. In my deep assurance there were two solutions from the
current situation. The solution number one, the government had to be
dismissed, a new coalition agreement should be signed and the new
government should be signed after it which would represent its
projects and the NA political majority would adopt it and only in
that case it will be possible to speak that the government has a
qualitative majority'.
But the solutions aren't limited. According to our interlocutor, there
is the second solution in case of which the National Assembly had to
be liquidated holding special elections. We noticed that all these
are already a passed stage, because nothing happened. So at what a
conclusion should we arrive? Dallakian's conclusions are the
following; `The analyze ofparliamentary elections of three republics
of Armenia shows that there is a great deficiency of holding free and
fair elections, that is, deficiency of parliamentarism. The executive
authority has formed the National Assembly since 1995 as a rule and
it is a political nonsense and is dangerous for the
country. Factually executive authority controls legislative one while
it should be the opposite'. In Victor Dallakian's opinion `market,
trade relations' have been formed today.
According to Victor Dallakian all these analyzes makes us conclude
that the current president can find himself in a profitable situation;
`Kocharian has that opportunity, especially the interest of the
outside world towards the parliamentary elections in 2007 has been
increased and they even understandin abroad that the wined powers in
parliamentary elections will be dominant during the presidential
elections in 2008. Now will be the opposite, parliamentary elections
will precede the presidential elections and each power will aspire to
get serious seats especially for achieving is goals in connection with
2008. That means mutual control will be great and in this case
Kocharian has an opportunity to be the guarantor for elections and
leave as the reformer. But it's another problem whether he will use
that opportunity'. To our question why should Robert Kocharian behave
himself in that way when it is obvious today that new-formed parties
are formed by Kocharian's approval? Victor Dallakian explained in this
way; `If it was profitable for Robert Kocharian to rig the results of
parliamentary elections in 2003 it can't be profitable for him in 2006
as he can't be nominated for the third time and in that case if he
becomes the guarantor of holding free and fair elections and powers
accepted and elected by people come to power his made mistakes can be
soothed and he will adopted as a political figure who has performed a
great mission. Anyway those powers, which will come to power in 2007,
must take into consideration Robert Kocharian till 2008. I think he
has an opportunity to use that chance and I, as a politician, consider
important to use that chance'.
Margaret Yesayan
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress