Tweet
Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
June 9 2006
The Meaning of the Mount Agri (Ararat) in the Armenian Issue Print
By Dr. Sedat Laciner
Friday , 09 June 2006
Mount Ağri (Ararat) is like 'the Ergenekon', or 'the Gokturk
Scriptures of the Armenians'. The Armenians believe that they are the
descendants of the Noah's children. According to an ancient Armenian
belief, the Deluge was not only a tragic catastrophe for the
Armenians, but also a great punishment and a test which came from the
God. There are similar approaches in other Christian sects as well.
But there are only a few who identify themselves with the Mount Ağri,
or Ararat as they call it, as much as the Armenians do. First of all,
the geographical proximity led to emotional proximity. This devotion
may be, regardless of religion, due to the genetic transmission of
the tradition of worshipping to the mountain.
This adoration can be observed in the Ottoman period or even before.
The Mount Ağri, arising with its splendor, was perceived by the
Armenians as a place to gather on its 'skirts'. But none of the
moments in history has this adoration to the Mount Ağri been as
`exalted' as today. The contemporary Armenians, so to say, deify the
Mount Ağri. They only remember Armenianness and revenge fever when
they see the Mount Ağri.
The current situation is not a good one and it is also not the result
of a natural process. The secessionist Armenian movement that started
before 1915 has sought help from many instruments such as terrorism,
assassinations, military coup, riot and collaboration with the
occupiers. The movement has never admitted defeat and the more it was
defeated, the more aggressor it became. It wanted to stand up as it
fell down and some time later, it turned out to get delight from
pain. The Armenians were first exiled to the Middle East, then to
Cyprus, to Europe and to other small regions. The feeling that the
journey was not complete did not perish as the Armenians arrived at
the final destinations like the U.S. and France. Perhaps, there has
left no place to arrive at geographically, but the journey in the
minds has severely continued. Some of them migrated first to the
Caucasus and then to Russia. Moreover, their exodus still continues.
The number of Russian Armenians who emigrated to the Western Europe
and the Northern America after the end of the Cold War increases day
by day.
Where is the motherland, where is the foreign land?
These two became fully mixed. An Armenia which doesn't include the
Mount Ağri is not perceived as a motherland.
It is hard for the Armenians to say `motherland' to an Armenia which
excluded Van adn Agri.
Well then, will these wounds heal if Turks give Van and Ararat (the
Mount Ağri)?
Is the issue that simple to say `what would you lose if you give us
Ağri?' as the Armenian-origin French singer Charles Aznavour asked.
In Turkish daily newspaper Milliyet (May 14, 2006), the answer of
Levon Ananyan, the chairman of the Armenian Writers Union, to Ece
Temelkuran's question reflects the same points:
`If you knew the meaning of Ararat (the Mount Ağri) to us, you would
carry it here by lorries! It is a mountain for you, but it is our
roots. We are an emotional community. You fear that we will demand
Ararat, but it is a hearty issue for us.'
In short, we also see in Ananyan's speech that Armenia is not viewed
as the real motherland. He sees the issue as `the motherland is where
Ararat is'. And what he doesn't see is the fact that the Mount Ağri
is very important to the Turks as well; that it is a hearty issue for
the Turks too. This is because the Mount Ağri is also a homeland for
the Turks. Just like Istanbul, Van or Izmir...
Frankly speaking, I find the Turkish approach much more sounder. The
Turks know that they came from the Altay Mountains and the Central
Asia. But they don't need a mountain or a scripture to make somewhere
homeland. They embrace and pay respect to the place they live in as
homeland. Even if you carry lorries of soil from the Central Asia, it
will not compare to Izmir for Turks. Same logic is also true in
religious aspect. The Turks will not differentiate between Gallipoli
and Mecca. Afyon is sacred, so is Ordu.
Another dimension of Armenian `disorder' is the Ararat compassion of
Armenians in the Diaspora. The Ararat, which is seen from Armenia,
can not be seen from California or Marseille (Diaspora). An
overwhelming majority of Armenians in the U.S. or France have never
seen Ararat and sat by the Van Lake. Most of them believe that they
will be slaughtered if they come to Turkey. They dream of Van and
Agri in such an `ignorance'. They name their shops with Anatolian
cities. They set up football teams and name it Malatyaspor. I don't
know what the name of this disorder in psychology is. I call it
`disorder', because the words `homesickness' or `nostalgia' are weak
for this situation.
***
The Armenia's situation is lamentable today. Unemployment is over
30%. The population is still decreasing. The unemployed youngsters
still emigrate. The Armenians, who have migrated at least 3-4 times
since 1915, keep on moving. They not only seek job or food but also
homeland. However, the homeland is the abandoned Armenia. They don't
even care about it. If millions of Armenians around the world had
invested some billions of dollars each year, Armenia would have
revitalized. Not only the emigration would have stopped but it would
also have attracted migrations from Turkey.
As long as the Armenians look at the Turkish territories from Armenia
and sigh, they will never have a homeland because the true homeland
is where you live. It is where you show your sympathy for homeland.
It is where you earn a living and live peacefully. The Armenians
perhaps will gather, if not today, on the skirts of the Mount Ağrı in
the future. But it will be never possible with this mentality. Let's
assume that they were able to obtain some land from Turkey through
violence and fraud. They will not have a homeland even in this case
because the Armenians don't know what homeland means. If Turkey had
given Ararat to Armenians, the Armenians would have only had a
mountain, but they would have lost Ararat. If they had been given
Van, they wouldn't have settled there. They would have only had a
lake but they would have lost `Vaspurakan', because they don't know
the value of Van. Can those who don't grasp the value of Armenia
grasp the value of new lands? They live in a world of dreams. The
yesterday's pains are more appealing than today's peace for them.
June 9 2006
The Meaning of the Mount Agri (Ararat) in the Armenian Issue Print
By Dr. Sedat Laciner
Friday , 09 June 2006
Mount Ağri (Ararat) is like 'the Ergenekon', or 'the Gokturk
Scriptures of the Armenians'. The Armenians believe that they are the
descendants of the Noah's children. According to an ancient Armenian
belief, the Deluge was not only a tragic catastrophe for the
Armenians, but also a great punishment and a test which came from the
God. There are similar approaches in other Christian sects as well.
But there are only a few who identify themselves with the Mount Ağri,
or Ararat as they call it, as much as the Armenians do. First of all,
the geographical proximity led to emotional proximity. This devotion
may be, regardless of religion, due to the genetic transmission of
the tradition of worshipping to the mountain.
This adoration can be observed in the Ottoman period or even before.
The Mount Ağri, arising with its splendor, was perceived by the
Armenians as a place to gather on its 'skirts'. But none of the
moments in history has this adoration to the Mount Ağri been as
`exalted' as today. The contemporary Armenians, so to say, deify the
Mount Ağri. They only remember Armenianness and revenge fever when
they see the Mount Ağri.
The current situation is not a good one and it is also not the result
of a natural process. The secessionist Armenian movement that started
before 1915 has sought help from many instruments such as terrorism,
assassinations, military coup, riot and collaboration with the
occupiers. The movement has never admitted defeat and the more it was
defeated, the more aggressor it became. It wanted to stand up as it
fell down and some time later, it turned out to get delight from
pain. The Armenians were first exiled to the Middle East, then to
Cyprus, to Europe and to other small regions. The feeling that the
journey was not complete did not perish as the Armenians arrived at
the final destinations like the U.S. and France. Perhaps, there has
left no place to arrive at geographically, but the journey in the
minds has severely continued. Some of them migrated first to the
Caucasus and then to Russia. Moreover, their exodus still continues.
The number of Russian Armenians who emigrated to the Western Europe
and the Northern America after the end of the Cold War increases day
by day.
Where is the motherland, where is the foreign land?
These two became fully mixed. An Armenia which doesn't include the
Mount Ağri is not perceived as a motherland.
It is hard for the Armenians to say `motherland' to an Armenia which
excluded Van adn Agri.
Well then, will these wounds heal if Turks give Van and Ararat (the
Mount Ağri)?
Is the issue that simple to say `what would you lose if you give us
Ağri?' as the Armenian-origin French singer Charles Aznavour asked.
In Turkish daily newspaper Milliyet (May 14, 2006), the answer of
Levon Ananyan, the chairman of the Armenian Writers Union, to Ece
Temelkuran's question reflects the same points:
`If you knew the meaning of Ararat (the Mount Ağri) to us, you would
carry it here by lorries! It is a mountain for you, but it is our
roots. We are an emotional community. You fear that we will demand
Ararat, but it is a hearty issue for us.'
In short, we also see in Ananyan's speech that Armenia is not viewed
as the real motherland. He sees the issue as `the motherland is where
Ararat is'. And what he doesn't see is the fact that the Mount Ağri
is very important to the Turks as well; that it is a hearty issue for
the Turks too. This is because the Mount Ağri is also a homeland for
the Turks. Just like Istanbul, Van or Izmir...
Frankly speaking, I find the Turkish approach much more sounder. The
Turks know that they came from the Altay Mountains and the Central
Asia. But they don't need a mountain or a scripture to make somewhere
homeland. They embrace and pay respect to the place they live in as
homeland. Even if you carry lorries of soil from the Central Asia, it
will not compare to Izmir for Turks. Same logic is also true in
religious aspect. The Turks will not differentiate between Gallipoli
and Mecca. Afyon is sacred, so is Ordu.
Another dimension of Armenian `disorder' is the Ararat compassion of
Armenians in the Diaspora. The Ararat, which is seen from Armenia,
can not be seen from California or Marseille (Diaspora). An
overwhelming majority of Armenians in the U.S. or France have never
seen Ararat and sat by the Van Lake. Most of them believe that they
will be slaughtered if they come to Turkey. They dream of Van and
Agri in such an `ignorance'. They name their shops with Anatolian
cities. They set up football teams and name it Malatyaspor. I don't
know what the name of this disorder in psychology is. I call it
`disorder', because the words `homesickness' or `nostalgia' are weak
for this situation.
***
The Armenia's situation is lamentable today. Unemployment is over
30%. The population is still decreasing. The unemployed youngsters
still emigrate. The Armenians, who have migrated at least 3-4 times
since 1915, keep on moving. They not only seek job or food but also
homeland. However, the homeland is the abandoned Armenia. They don't
even care about it. If millions of Armenians around the world had
invested some billions of dollars each year, Armenia would have
revitalized. Not only the emigration would have stopped but it would
also have attracted migrations from Turkey.
As long as the Armenians look at the Turkish territories from Armenia
and sigh, they will never have a homeland because the true homeland
is where you live. It is where you show your sympathy for homeland.
It is where you earn a living and live peacefully. The Armenians
perhaps will gather, if not today, on the skirts of the Mount Ağrı in
the future. But it will be never possible with this mentality. Let's
assume that they were able to obtain some land from Turkey through
violence and fraud. They will not have a homeland even in this case
because the Armenians don't know what homeland means. If Turkey had
given Ararat to Armenians, the Armenians would have only had a
mountain, but they would have lost Ararat. If they had been given
Van, they wouldn't have settled there. They would have only had a
lake but they would have lost `Vaspurakan', because they don't know
the value of Van. Can those who don't grasp the value of Armenia
grasp the value of new lands? They live in a world of dreams. The
yesterday's pains are more appealing than today's peace for them.