Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Turkish Dilemma

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Turkish Dilemma

    THE TURKISH DILEMMA
    By George Gregoriou

    Greek News, New York
    March 20 2006

    At a party the other day a French woman who was connected with the
    United Nations said to me "Turkey will not be in the European Union".

    I said "I will not loose any sleep over it. If Turkey does change she
    does not deserve to be in the EU". Maybe the cynical among us will
    not loose any sleep. But, Washington and London will, and the Turkish
    corporate interests and the left, who want to move in the direction of
    Europe. Official Athens and Nicosia also want Turkey to be in Europe. A
    more civilized Turkey will be a better neighbor in the Aegean, even
    settle the Cyprus problem in a way which is acceptable to the Greek and
    Turkish Cypriots. At least, this has been the official line from the
    moment Ankara became a candidate for membership in the European Union.

    Not all Turks want to join the European Union. Not just nationalists
    and Islamicists. Secularists are not eager, especially if Turkey
    will pay a price for membership in the EU. PM Embarkan, PM Erdogan's
    predecessor/head of the Islamist movement, wanted to redirect Turkey
    towards the Islamic Middle East, even form an Islamic "NATO". He
    was booted out of power by the military. PM Erdogan has managed to
    tip-toe around this issue, maintaining his Islamic credentials but
    maneuvering in the direction of the EU, for the economic benefits.

    The recent crisis over the trial and possible jailing of the prominent
    novelist Orhan Pamuk is only the tip of the iceberg. Pamuk is not the
    real issue. Turkey is on trial, stated Oli Rehn, the EU enlargement
    commissioner. The charge against Pamuk is over his statement in an
    interview with Das Magazin, a Swiss publication, that the Ottoman
    Turks committed genocide against the Armenians in 1915.

    Over a million Armenians were massacred. The Kurds, who were "promised"
    Armenian land and property, hand a hand in this massacre, until
    Ataturk turned his guns on these "mountain Turks". Pamuk's other
    "crime" was his statement that thousands of Kurds were killed in
    the war against the separatist P.K.I. in the 1980s. These comments
    "denigrate Turkishness". Any criticism of the state, the army, or the
    founder of the Turkish Republic, Kemal Ataturk, are crimes which can
    send one to prison. Pamuk is not the first to be charged. According to
    the NYTimes(12/17/05) nearly 60 intellectuals have been charged with
    this crime. On his way to court Pamuk was confronted by protestors
    hurling eggs and insults "Traitor Pamuk!"

    The Islamic religion in Turkey is not the only issue. Those who
    brought the charges against Pamuk are known secularists who brought
    charges against women wearing the shroud, which violates the Ataturk
    legacy of modernization. So, if we were to add the Islamists and the
    nationalists/secularists who will defend Turkish "honor" against
    free speech and democratic rights, who among the 70 million Turks
    is eligible to be in the EU at a time when the wave of anti-Muslim
    attitudes is on the increase throughout Europe?

    The Pamuk trial was so hot, the political and criminal establishment
    postponed the case until February 7. Turkey's trajectory into the
    EU is at risk. If Pamuk is found not guilty in February the penal
    code is invalidated. If he is guilty, more ammunition is given to
    those opposing Turkey in the EU, a slap in the face of the Bush-Blair
    regimes promoting. Turkey's accession talks for geopolitical reasons,
    to control the Middle East and Central Asia for their oil and natural
    resources.

    Turkey's trajectory into the EU will be very bumpy. The Pamuk case
    involves admission by the Ankara regime for the crimes committed
    against Armenians and Kurds, which is common knowledge throughout
    the world. The worse scenario would be demands for reparations by
    the descendants of the Armenians massacred. The Turkish state seems
    to be good at taking, not giving or paying its dues, even offering an
    apology for crimes committed 90 years ago. Money is the real problem,
    but there is more to it. Pandora's box will be opened. A flood will be
    cascading into the faces of those Turks hiding behind the fig leaf of
    "honor" to deny the barbarism within the Turkish civilization.

    If official Ankara cannot admit to the massacre of Armenians and
    Greeks at the turn of the last century, how can it admit to the crimes
    committed against the 15 million Kurds, persecuted since the days of
    Ataturk. Ataturk's policy was, those who could be Turkified could stay
    in Turkey, those who could not, be eliminated. The fate of millions
    of Greeks, Armenians, and Jews in Asia Minor is well-known to Turks
    in the street, but not to the all the regimes in Ankara since WWI.

    This Turkish barbarism is not just the legacy of the past. The war
    on the Kurds continued throughout the 20th Century. It continues
    today in Eastern Anatolia and Ankara's current policy towards the
    Kurds in northern Iraq. It continues in Cyprus as well. The invasion
    and ethnic cleansing in 1974 has been in place for 31 years. 200,000
    Cypriots were forced to leave the northern part of Cyprus, to make
    room for 130,000 settlers from Anatolia. This is the Turkish method of
    settling disputes, settlers to change the demographics and an army of
    occupation to guarantee that the facts on the ground created by the
    invasion are irreversible. There could be a settlement of the Cyprus
    problem between the Greeks and Turks of Cyprus within 24 hours if
    the settlers and the Turkish army were to go back to Turkey.

    Ankara is not alone in this crime. Washington and London are its
    co-conspirators.

    The Turkish dilemma is real. If Ankara cannot admit the massacre of
    the Armenians and is prosecuting one of Turkeyıs best known novelist,
    Orhan Pamuk, how can it deal with the Kurdish and Cyprus problems
    if it is serious and wants to be in the EU? Nicosia, Athens, and
    other European capitals may have the last word: a veto over Turkeyıs
    membership in the European Union.

    *** George Gregoriou Professor, Critical Theory and Geopolitics
    Department of Political Science The William Paterson University Wayne,
    New Jersey 07470 e-mail: [email protected]

    http://www.greeknewsonline.c om/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid= 4248&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

    --Bo undary_(ID_LKYnrIq3TAjI2VLZJ/I9dA)--
Working...
X