Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What lies beneath

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What lies beneath

    What lies beneath

    Bangkok Post - Thailand; Mar 24, 2006
    KONG RITHDEE

    Where the Truth Lies, Starring Kevin Bacon, Colin Firth, Alison
    Lohman, Rachel Blanchard, Directed by Atom Egoyan : With a little help
    from live lobsters, potbellied mobsters, and a 39-hour save-polio-kids
    live telethon that succeeds in canonising a pair of showbiz sleazebags
    as Angels of America, Lanny Morris and Vince Collins, a song-and-dance
    nightclub duo from the 1950s, worm their way out of a murder scandal
    when the corpse of a blonde waitress shows up in their hotel suite's
    bathtub. There's a session of amphetamine-fuelled menage a trois,
    complete with confusion over limbs and orifices, and a shot of
    fantasised lesbian sex between Alice (as in Wonderland) and a
    zonked-out Nancy Drew-wannabe in a slinky dress.

    Sure it sounds like something that makes males sweat. But Where the
    Truth Lies, Atom Egoyan's schematic reconstruction of noirish
    semi-potboilers, ends up like a pedantic exercise in complex
    screenwriting that involves us in the process yet yields little
    payoff. In classic Egoyan works, like Exotica, Felicia's Journey and
    above all The Sweet Hereafter (check them out on DVD), the
    writer/director's celebrated technique of jigsaw narrative - where the
    story loops back and forth in time with sublime fluency, where the
    characters' fragmented memories supply the rich vein of narrative -
    yields not simply a complete picture of what "really happened" after
    the collages are put together, but also a profound feeling of
    heartache and loss that strike his protagonists as inevitable.

    Egoyan, a Canadian auteur of Armenian descent, remains as agile as
    ever in his manipulation of past and present in this detective/drama
    period montage.

    But what I see is craft; and what's lacking is the empathy we usually
    feel for the characters suffering from the vestige of long-ago
    tragedies, which makes Egoyan's early films shrill and resonant.

    Here the story relies on shifting points of view in recounting a
    Rashomon-style murder mystery. In the late 1950s, Lanny Morris and
    Vince Collins (Kevin Bacon and Colin Firth, in sinewy performances)
    are a restless comic duo booked by nightclubs on either coast, usually
    ones managed by the mob. Lanny (Bacon channelling a licentious lustre)
    croons numbers and seduces pretty audiences as his buddy Vince pops
    pills and beats up smart-ass male spectators in the toilet. Not
    surprisingly, Lanny and Vince backstage are the id of their on-stage
    superego, two cynical duds who suffer the showbiz burden of having to
    be nice to the public when they know in the privacy of their own
    hearts that they're not nice guys.

    That would remain tolerable enough had the wide-eyed corpse of
    Maureen, a waitress who delivered room service to the duo three nights
    before, not been found floating in their bathtub just after their
    historic live telethon. The film fast forwards to the early '70s,
    where we meet Karen O'Connor (Alison Lohman), a journalist who's
    investigating the duo's break-up following the scandal.

    Karen approaches Vince for an interview - her publishing house agrees
    to pay him a hefty sum - then in an incredible coincidence, she bumps
    into Lanny on her first-class flight, where he wastes not a second in
    seducing her with his smoothie's spell. Karen lies to him about her
    real job and identity, and the encounter fires her up to unearth the
    truth about the murder 15 years ago.

    What I've described is a simplification; Egoyan's plot is pocketed
    with little nooks and crannies that weave into a complicated web of
    deceit, as flashbacks and recollections gradually peel off the cover.
    They provide clues to solve the whodunit mystery, but I don't think
    they really add up to the meanings of the characters' motives. The
    recurring theme of the film is how everybody has double faces: one to
    be worn in order to get what he/she wants, the other, naturally
    uglier, is kept hidden under the lid until no more lies can cover the
    truth. In this dynamism of duplicity - the gist of film noir tradition
    - the roles of victims and perpetrators are constantly shifted as
    truth and lies mingle freely. Lanny, Vince, Karen, and even Maureen -
    when they take off their clothes in the film's notorious NC-17 sex
    scenes - are they also shedding their skins to reveal to us who they
    really are?

    Perhaps not. Stilted as the direction is, the film sometimes groans
    under the heavy mechanism of its own plot. Where the Truth Lies is
    based on a novel by Rupert Holmes, who used real-life celebrities,
    Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis, as his protagonists (Lanny and Vince are
    fictitious substitutes). The advantage of using real celebrities in
    the narrative, I believe, is in showing the impact of social milieu of
    post-war America, as the cult of celebrities gives way to moral
    corruption. Lanny and Vince couldn't have done what they did had they
    not been exalted by the media in general and television in particular
    to star status. They - as well as their groupies, Karen and Maureen
    included - are the products of their own heady decades, though the
    film could've pressed harder in this regard and recast its characters
    at the centre of a cultural shift that's taking place around them.

    Sure we'll find out the truth about what really happens to Maureen
    that night in the hotel, all details of the incident neatly laid out
    and wrapped in a nice package. That's when the truth stops lying, and
    unfortunately that's also when the film stops being interesting.
Working...
X