Tweet
EVOLUTION WAY DOESN'T EXIST
Margaret Yesayan
Aravot.am
18 May 06
The "Republic" party leader Aram Sargsian makes such a conclusion
from the last events.
How do you mark what happened to the OEP. It seems it is a bad
tradition that such stories happen to almost all political powers of
Armenia from time to time.
These authorities realized privatization in the economic field of
Armenia and the result of that privatization was the formation
of monopolistic economies. The same they act with the political
field. They have finished privatization of the economy and have begun
the privatization of the political field.
And they do their best to privatize the political field completely. And
this is a way, which leads to destruction. We live in the 21st century
but unfortunately their logic belongs to the 19th century.
Do you consider normal that the political power inside the authority
constantly criticizes the authority and then becomes the opposition.
Every political power has been formed round its project, goals and
ideology.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of timeservers in the authority. Be
sure if such a situation starts against "Republican" less people will
remain in that party than they remained in the OEP. If such process
starts against Robert Kocharian or Serge Sargsian nobody will stay
with them. Unfortunately it is so.
Those persons who left the OEP hadn't entered into that party for
the ideology of that party but for having support /roof/, avoiding
of some kind of taxes, acquiring some sort of property. This must be
a problem for those persons who will admit those persons making them
as their advisors or something else.
Can Robert Kocharian use this situation in favor of him, declaring
to international structures that he can't concretize his answers on
Karabakh conflict because of the political situation in the country?
I share that standpoint that this situation was formed for solving
just such problems. Because there is only a cause; internal political
situation. And this can lead to double dangers. I see Robert
Kocharian's refusal of not taking part in the NATO summit in this
context. Today Robert Kocharian is in the political backstage and
the outside world has some demands from him. He is in this situation
because of himself, and frankly speaking, I pity him.
Some people think that Serge Sargsian takes advantages for the
coming presidential elections from the events happened to Arthur
Baghdasarian. There were two possible presidential candidates in the
authority and one of them must leave.
I don't think that Serge Sargsian took advantages of it because it
doesn't bring public resource, public vote to him. Serge Sargsian
has administrative and financial resources. But I'm sure that force
majeure conditions will be in Armenia and presidential elections will
be held before parliamentary elections.
Doesn't Arthur Baghdasarian disturb the oppositionists becoming
the opposition?
It isn't so. There is a plenty of places in the opposition and
each party from the opposition proves that nothing is right in
the authority and there is a crisis in that field. Opposition or
authority is decided during the elections and the opposition has
won in all our elections and it will. Why don't I go to the NA,
because I consider it non legitimate. And now if people think that
the elections had been rigged and the coming elections must be fair,
I consider it positive. 'RepublicÂ" party declared that the only way
of a problem settlement is revolution. Arthur Baghdasarian tried to
prove that there was an evolution way for the problem settlement. And
here is the result. I think he made sure that the evolution way didn't
exist and the only way was revolution.
--Boundary_(ID_JNvxlRXLO5Wa61ADDQrkdA )--
Margaret Yesayan
Aravot.am
18 May 06
The "Republic" party leader Aram Sargsian makes such a conclusion
from the last events.
How do you mark what happened to the OEP. It seems it is a bad
tradition that such stories happen to almost all political powers of
Armenia from time to time.
These authorities realized privatization in the economic field of
Armenia and the result of that privatization was the formation
of monopolistic economies. The same they act with the political
field. They have finished privatization of the economy and have begun
the privatization of the political field.
And they do their best to privatize the political field completely. And
this is a way, which leads to destruction. We live in the 21st century
but unfortunately their logic belongs to the 19th century.
Do you consider normal that the political power inside the authority
constantly criticizes the authority and then becomes the opposition.
Every political power has been formed round its project, goals and
ideology.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of timeservers in the authority. Be
sure if such a situation starts against "Republican" less people will
remain in that party than they remained in the OEP. If such process
starts against Robert Kocharian or Serge Sargsian nobody will stay
with them. Unfortunately it is so.
Those persons who left the OEP hadn't entered into that party for
the ideology of that party but for having support /roof/, avoiding
of some kind of taxes, acquiring some sort of property. This must be
a problem for those persons who will admit those persons making them
as their advisors or something else.
Can Robert Kocharian use this situation in favor of him, declaring
to international structures that he can't concretize his answers on
Karabakh conflict because of the political situation in the country?
I share that standpoint that this situation was formed for solving
just such problems. Because there is only a cause; internal political
situation. And this can lead to double dangers. I see Robert
Kocharian's refusal of not taking part in the NATO summit in this
context. Today Robert Kocharian is in the political backstage and
the outside world has some demands from him. He is in this situation
because of himself, and frankly speaking, I pity him.
Some people think that Serge Sargsian takes advantages for the
coming presidential elections from the events happened to Arthur
Baghdasarian. There were two possible presidential candidates in the
authority and one of them must leave.
I don't think that Serge Sargsian took advantages of it because it
doesn't bring public resource, public vote to him. Serge Sargsian
has administrative and financial resources. But I'm sure that force
majeure conditions will be in Armenia and presidential elections will
be held before parliamentary elections.
Doesn't Arthur Baghdasarian disturb the oppositionists becoming
the opposition?
It isn't so. There is a plenty of places in the opposition and
each party from the opposition proves that nothing is right in
the authority and there is a crisis in that field. Opposition or
authority is decided during the elections and the opposition has
won in all our elections and it will. Why don't I go to the NA,
because I consider it non legitimate. And now if people think that
the elections had been rigged and the coming elections must be fair,
I consider it positive. 'RepublicÂ" party declared that the only way
of a problem settlement is revolution. Arthur Baghdasarian tried to
prove that there was an evolution way for the problem settlement. And
here is the result. I think he made sure that the evolution way didn't
exist and the only way was revolution.
--Boundary_(ID_JNvxlRXLO5Wa61ADDQrkdA )--