Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Human Rights Are Not Protected By Turkey's Constitution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Human Rights Are Not Protected By Turkey's Constitution

    HUMAN RIGHTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY TURKEY'S CONSTITUTION
    By Dana Swartz

    Kurdish Media, UK
    Nov 5 2006

    It is important to remember that although Turkey is considered a
    democratic nation, its government is still controlled by the military
    regime. The Turkish Constitution, while an attempt to show democracy,
    allows for the violation of Human Rights towards the minorities that
    live in Turkey. This is proven everyday, when the Turkish government
    still attempts to deny the Armenian Genocide, and allows its military
    to continue to harass and murder innocent Kurds. Turkey claims that
    if Kurds, Armenians, or other minorities are allowed to have their
    identity it will destroy the republic. Well the United States, as
    you can read from its name, is the unity of 50 states, territories,
    and home to thousands of immigrants that are still arriving every year.

    Other Western nations also have immigrants who are recognized for
    their individuality, ethnic traditions, cultures, and languages,
    yet these nations are not destroyed.

    So, how can allowing the minorities in Turkey to be seen as distinct
    ethnic groups weaken Turkey? One has only to look at history to see
    that trying to change or assimilate a group of people, only leads to
    civil wars, deep hatred, and horrible atrocities to life. In addition,
    the laws that are made using the Turkish Constitution should apply
    to every citizen residing within Turkey's boarders, not just certain
    groups of people.

    Even though little changes have been made to the Constitution, these
    changes have not occurred in real life. Human Rights abuses are still
    occurring everyday, in direct violation, of the two greatest democratic
    organizations in the world, the United Nations and the European Union.

    Hitler was forcibly removed from power for his atrocities towards the
    Jews. The Khmer Rouge was tried over the ethnic cleansing in Cambodia.

    Saddam Hussein and his Ba'th regime were removed from power by
    democratic forces for his government's policy of genocide towards
    Kurds. When will Turkey be punished for its attempts to annihilate
    its own minority populations by hiding behind a Constitution that is
    legally and morally wrong?

    Who are the Kurds?

    Today, approximately 40 million Kurds make up the largest ethnic
    group of people without a recognized country. The Kurds live in the
    mountainous areas in southeast and east of Turkey, northwest of Iran,
    north of Iraq, and northeast of Syria. The Kurdish people can claim
    their heritage back to Ancient Mesopotamia. The mountainous regions
    they live in are harsh areas, which few people could live in and
    prosper; however the Kurds made it their home and have lived there for
    thousands of years. The major mountain regions they live in are the
    Taurus, Zagros, and Elburz Mountains. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers
    are the major source of water, not only for the mountains, but also for
    much of the Middle East. The Kurds are agricultural: raising sheep,
    goats, and cereals, such as wheat, barley, and oats. Another major
    crop of the Kurds is tobacco. Some of the finest "Turkish tobacco"
    is grown in the land of the Kurds. Kurds belong to clans, which are
    part of a tribe. The clans make up the immediate family groups, while
    the tribe makes up the extended family. Kurdish people are fiercely
    loyal to their family, clan, and tribe. (About the Kurds, History &
    Hemin Shekhani).

    Another important aspect of Kurdish life is the language that they
    speak.

    Kurdish language is in the Indo-European family of languages. Kurdish
    is broken up into four main dialects, Kurmanci (60%), Sorani (25%),
    Zazaki (10%), and Gorani (5%), with many smaller sub-dialects.

    According to Kemal Burkay, "Kurdish is a lively and rich language
    that has managed to survive despite all the oppression and bans to
    which is has been exposed." (Kurdistan's Homepage, Para 3). Kurdish
    is considered one of the few surviving original languages of the
    Mesopotamian people. Because the Kurdish language is so rich and
    vibrant, it has created beautiful traditions using songs and poetry.

    Before 1991, Kurds were not even allowed to speak their language in
    the privacy of their homes without fear of being arrested, or worse,
    killed. Since 1991, Kurds are now allowed to speak the Kurdish language
    inside their homes, but it is still illegal to write, read or teach the
    language. Today more than half of all Kurds living in Turkey cannot
    read or write Kurdish because of Turkey's brutal Constitutional laws
    concerning the language. In Turkey if minorities speak their "mother
    language" they are branded as traitors, terrorist, and enemies of
    the state.

    The country known as Kurdistan by the Kurds includes land from Turkey,
    Iran, Iraq, Syria, and small parts of Russia. According to census
    reports, approximately 50% of all Kurds live in Turkey, with smaller
    percentages living in the other areas of Kurdistan. After World War I,
    Kurds were promised a separate and independent country-state, in the
    Treaty of Servres, but then England and France, decide to divvy up
    the land and not give the Kurds their independence. "The Treaty of
    Lausanne formalized this division."

    (About the Kurds, History, Para 15). Since this time, Kurds all
    over the world have clamored for their rights of culture, language,
    traditions, and autonomy. But most importantly, the Kurds have asked
    to be recognized as a distinct people.

    Quoting directly from Hemin Shekhani's website, "the Turkish government
    also passed various laws forbidding the use of the Kurdish language and
    imposing other restrictions on manifestations of Kurdish nationalism.

    Although all Turkish Kurds possess full Turkish citizenship and
    millions of Kurds have assimilated into Turkish society, relations
    between Kurds and the Turkish government continue to be strained."

    (Hemin Shekhani, History of Kurdistan). Kurds in Turkey, for the
    last 80 years, were forced to be assimilated into Turks. By this,
    the Republic of Turkey has denied the existence of Kurds, their
    language, culture, ethnicity, and traditions. Since the 1980's Kurds
    "have waged a war of national liberation" against Turkeys governmental
    and military attempts to suppress all signs of Kurdish identity. (The
    Kurds & the Future of Turkey, Page 21). The Turkish government has
    been exceptionally harsh and repressive to its Kurdish population.

    The Washington Post stated in an article, "Turkish government, which
    tried to deprive them [the Kurds] of Kurdish identity by designating
    them "Mountain Turks, outlawing their language and forbidding them
    to wear traditional Kurdish costumes in the cities. The government
    also encouraged the migration of Kurds to the cities to dilute
    the population in the uplands. Turkey continues its policy of not
    recognizing the Kurds as a minority group." (Washington Post. Para 4).

    "The Kurds have been subjugated by neighboring peoples for most of
    their history. In modern times, Kurds have tried to set up independent
    states in Iran, Iraq and Turkey, but their efforts have been crushed
    every time." (Washington Post, Background: The Kurds Inset). While
    many Kurds want a separate and recognized state called Kurdistan, much
    could be settle peaceable if Kurds were allowed their identity. Forcing
    a people to abandon their culture, traditions, language, music, and
    other ideals that make them unique, is cultural genocide. Basic Human
    rights are what each of us, as individuals require, so why deny the
    Kurds these same rights?

    Why should the Kurds be treated separately from any other ethnic
    group in the world? Kurds deserve to be recognized, allowed the
    freedom of identity, and the right to be the unique people that they
    are. Turkey's Constitution grants the right that all individuals should
    be allowed their identity so why are they killing Kurds for saying
    "I am a Kurd!" This is not freedom this is murder, this is genocide!

    The physical, linguistic, and cultural genocide committed by
    Turkey against the Kurds is treated with silence and/or considered
    controversial.

    The status of the Turkish government in denying their actions has
    created pressure on the United States and other Western Nations
    governments, universities, and media organizations to treat this
    holocaust as delusions of the Kurdish people. The Turkish government
    is in full control of media, and many attempts to let the outside
    world know what is really happening in Southeastern Turkey [Northern
    Kurdistan] are met with beatings, destroyed camera equipment, and
    imprisonment for reporters from all western nations. It is even worse
    for the Kurds who have tried to document the atrocities occurring,
    as they usually just disappear, never to be seen again. The denial
    of the Turks and their government in regards to this horrible time
    in their recent history suggests that any government that commits
    crimes against humanity will go unpunished and suffering of the people
    involved will continue.

    Turkish Constitutions Articles and Human Rights:

    The Turkish Constitution states that it is the law of the Republic
    of Turkey. The Constitution is a large document with many articles,
    polices, and rules. Only the articles, policies, and laws pertaining
    to Human Rights will be discussed in this paper. In this section
    of the paper you will see how the Constitution seems to allows for
    human rights, but examples will show how those same rights are being
    violated were Kurds are concerned.

    To begin, here is a quote from the Preamble of the Turkish
    Constitution, "they [the people of the Turkish Republic] have the
    right to demand a peaceful life based on absolute respect for one
    another's rights and freedoms, mutual love and fellowship, and the
    desire for, and belief in, 'Peace at home, peace in the world.'"
    (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey Page 2, Para 1). This
    sentence signifies that every citizen in Turkey has the right to
    live a peaceful and just life. If this is the case, then why has
    the Turkish government forcibly removed Kurds from the homes they
    have lived in for centuries? Do you think that having your house,
    business, and/or village destroyed and burned to the ground, allows
    for a peaceful life? Turkey's own human rights minister admitted
    that the military has been destroying Kurdish villages for years. He
    stated, "Some two million Kurds have been displaced, a dozen towns
    depopulated and five to six million Kurds forced into western Turkey
    by state terror and economic collapse." (A Test for Turkey, Page 1,
    Para 3). Yet when questioned by the United Nations, Turkey's government
    denies they are burning villages or forcibly removing minorities from
    their ancestral lands.

    Article 10, Section 10 of the Turkish Constitution states, "All
    individuals are equal without and discrimination before the law,
    irrespective of language, race, color, sex, political opinion,
    philosophical belief, religion and sect, or any such considerations."

    (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, Page 3, Para. 3). This
    statement is a true democratic statement shared by all the democratic
    nations of the world. However, while this article gives equal rights
    to all citizens, it is not enforced where Kurds are concerned. The
    language of the Kurds is forcibly denied to the Kurdish people. The
    beginning of the Constitution says that Turkish is the national
    language, but Turkey has several languages that are unique to the
    individual groups that live within Turkey's boarders. What threat
    is it to the nation as a whole to allow these native languages to be
    used, taught, and spoken? How come military personal are allowed to
    shoot you in the street for speaking Kurdish or whistling a Kurdish
    tune. Outlawing a language because it belongs to a minority group is
    ludicrous. Forcing Kurds to give up their mother tongue is cultural
    genocide and Turkey's government has been doing this for over 80
    years. Kurds are till not allowed to speak Kurdish in their own homes.

    In addition, the Turkish Constitution says everyone born in Turkey
    is Turkish, not a Turkish citizen, but Turkish. Well if both your
    parents are Kurdish and you are born in Turkey that makes you a
    Turkish citizen of Kurdish heritage, not a Turk. For the Turkish
    government there is no such thing and they prove this by making
    elementary children stand up and recite that they are Turks everyday.

    Kurds are not allowed to call themselves Kurds. Kurds are not allowed
    to recognize their identity without fear of dreadful repercussions.

    Why is it against the law, punishable by torture and death, to call
    oneself a Kurd? Does this sound like equality? Kurds are distinct race,
    with culture and traditions, which have a right to be recognized,
    respected, and treated without discrimination. While Turkey's
    constitution says all people are born equal, clearly, equal only
    applies to those who are willing to forget who they are and become
    Turks.

    Secondly, no one is allowed to speak out or mention the atrocities that
    are occurring everyday to the Kurds. While the Turkish Constitution
    guarantees the right to speak freely, that only applies as long as you
    talk about what the government wants you to speak about. To speak out
    against the government or the military actions taken against Kurds
    is tantamount to suicide and murder for your family. Leyla Zana,
    a member of the Turkish Parliament and a Kurd, was sentenced to
    fifteen years in prison for "bearing witness to the Kurdish people's
    immense tragedy in Turkey." (A Test for Turkey, Page 1, Para 1). Nor
    is Leyla Zana the only one, even today many journalists, newspaper
    printers/writers, radio stations producers, and academics are being
    arrested, imprisoned, or disappearing because they have talked about
    the Kurdish Problem, even citizens of other countries. Turkey's
    government refuses to admit there is a problem, one created by their
    own hatreds, so instead of trying to compromise and peacefully fix
    these issues, the government allows the Turkish military and state
    police to commit genocide. This is Turkey's idea of democracy; make
    a constitution then let the military interpret the way they want,
    even if it means killings thousands of innocent Kurds.

    Freedom of Religion and conscience is defined in Section IV, Article
    24 of the Turkish Constitution as: "Everyone has the right to freedom
    of conscience, religious beliefs and conviction. Acts of worship,
    religious services, and ceremonies may be conducted freely -No one
    may be compelled to worship, or be blamed or accused because of
    his religious beliefs and convictions. Education and instruction in
    religion and ethics shall be conducted under State supervision and
    control." (Turkish Constitution, Page 5, Para. 4). This article shows,
    without a doubt, how double standard the government is when it comes
    to human rights. In one sentence it defines freedom of religion, and
    in another sentence it states the government has control over what
    you can believe. In Turkey, the religion is Islamic; the state runs
    strict educational programs that only cover the Islamic religion. The
    government therefore does not allow for the freedom of religion for
    those who follow the Yezidi religion, Christian religion, or any other
    religion. Those citizens who chose to follow a different religion
    will soon find themselves criminals of the Republic or Turkey and
    branded a terrorist.

    Article 28, Section 10 of the Turkish Constitution allows for the
    Freedom of Press and Publication. It states, "The Press is free, and
    may not be censored. The State shall take the necessary measures to
    ensure the freedom of the Press and freedom of information." (Turkish
    Constitution, Page 6, Para 4&5). Well, this sounds like a great
    Constitutional amendment, it has never been allowed when the newspapers
    or magazines are written in Kurdish. It is against the military law
    to publish any newspapers, magazines, radio programs, or other such
    informative materials in any language other than Turkish.

    All types of Press that have opened up and tried to publish in Kurdish
    have been forcibly put out of business, and the owners/writers
    imprisoned or killed. What kind of Freedom of Press is this? This
    is state censorship, and attempt by the government with military
    backing to ruin a minorities chance to read and be educated in their
    own language. Again, this stresses how Turkey is committing cultural
    genocide towards the Kurds while hiding behind a Constitution that is
    not worth the paper it is written on. Another thing to remember is
    that even the Turkish newspapers can only print what the government
    wishes it to print; all articles must coincide with what the government
    wants the public to know.

    United Nations

    Before there was a United Nations, there was the League of Nations.

    The League of Nations was founded during World War I under the Treaty
    of Versailles. Its mission was "to promote international cooperation
    and to achieve peace and security" (History of the United Nations,
    Par 4).

    Franklin D. Roosevelt, the United States President came up with the
    name United Nations during World War II. This name was officially used
    in 1942 when the Declaration by the United Nations was convened by
    26 nations committed to continue fighting the hostile Axis Powers of
    the Second World War. The United Nations was not officially organized
    until 1945 when 50 countries met in San Francisco to work out the
    details on how this organization would function. The charter of the
    United Nations was signed on June 26, 1945 and the United Nations
    was officially open for business on October 24 1945.

    According to the United Nations website, the following words are the
    reason for it's [the United Nation] existence.

    "The only true basis of enduring peace is the willing cooperation of
    free peoples in a world in which, relieved of the menace of aggression,
    all may enjoy economic and social security. It is our intention to
    work together, and with other free peoples, both in war and peace,
    to this end." (History of the UN Charter, Par 4).

    The United Nations was the first organization to introduce human
    rights laws for all membership countries to follow. It is believed
    that the United Nations greatest achievement was the creation of
    Human Rights Laws and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Charter. This Charter defines human rights and what is included
    within those rights. The United Nations expects all its members to
    commit to this charter and not violate its decrees; the charter is
    "one to which all nations can subscribe and to which all people can
    aspire." (United Nations, Human Rights, Par 1). The United Nations has
    defined a wide range of rights that include, but are not limited to,
    economic, social, cultural, political, and civil rights.

    According to the UN the most important individual fundamental rights
    are as follows:

    1) Dignity 2) Freedoms 3) Equality 4) Solidarity 5) Citizens' Rights
    6) Justice

    Guidelines have been drawn to help all the membership nations to
    protect and assist their governments in being responsible towards
    its citizen's human rights.

    Human Rights law receives its foundation from the United Nations
    Charter and Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These laws
    are important internationally, as they are used to determine if a
    country is in violation of human rights. Individuals and nations can
    be tried and punished according to the human rights laws enacted by
    the United Nations.

    Over the years the United Nations has made amendments and adjustments
    to the Charter and Universal Declaration to allow more+

    Specific standards for women, children, disabled persons, minorities,
    migrant workers and other vulnerable groups, who now possess rights
    that protect them from discriminatory practices that had long
    been common in many societies. Rights have been extended through
    groundbreaking General Assembly decisions that have gradually
    established their universality, indivisibility and interrelatedness
    with development and democracy (United Nations, Human Rights, Par 3).

    The United Nations has spent many man-hours and dollars on educational
    campaigns to make sure that every citizen or every country knows what
    their inalienable rights are. Also, the educational campaigns are
    designed to inform the general populations that a national judicial
    and penal system is available for grievances to be discussed. This
    branch of the United Nations has gained considered power among member
    and non-member countries as a champion of human rights issues. In
    addition, "the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights works
    to strengthen and coordinate United Nations work for the protection and
    promotion of all human rights of all persons around the world" (United
    Nations, Human Rights, Par 5). According to the Secretary-General
    of the United Nations the ideals surrounding peace and security,
    humanitarian assistance, and social affairs is the most important
    duty of the Organization's work.

    (United Nations, Human Rights, Par 5).

    These fundamental rights can be found and describe in detail on the
    United Nations website. Every individual should know what these rights
    are, there definitions, and every country should apply them to their
    populations. Basic Human Rights are guaranteed by the United Nations.

    Furthermore, any country that is a member of this great organization
    must also guarantee its citizens these fundamental rights. As a member
    of the United Nations, Turkey must demonstrate adherence to the laws
    provided by this multi-national group. However, Turkey still engages
    in cultural and physical genocide towards its minorities while the
    United Nations basically turns its head in the other direction.

    How can a country, like Turkey, who has proven it-self to be unreliable
    in allowing its minority citizens to have basic Human Rights, be
    allowed into the United Nations? Since Turkey is a member of the
    United Nations why does its Constitution allow for violations of
    Basic Human Rights?

    According to the United Nations own Universal Declaration of
    Human Rights, Turkey is not a country of democracy, but a military
    dictatorship that abuses its own citizens. Yet, the United Nations
    still allow the atrocities of human rights abuses to continue,
    without any kind of repercussions to Turkey. While the rest of
    the western world continues to look away from Turkey's excesses of
    military use against its own citizens, the horrors continue. Will we,
    the democratic nations, silently look the other way, while innocent
    people are abused, murdered, and annihilated?

    Will Turkey be allowed to continue its ideals of democracy, using its
    constitution as a weapon, and legal document to commit genocide to the
    Kurds? How can we live with ourselves, as a nation, as individuals,
    if we do not fight against this type of false democracy that Turkey
    is projecting to the world with its Constitution and violations of
    Basic Human Rights?

    Democratic nations cannot condemn Hitler and his Nazis, Saddam
    Hussein and his regime and give other governments like Turkey the
    right to continue committing genocide towards its minorities. We
    can't undo the past or raise the dead, but we can remember and learn
    from history, and stop the abuses that are occurring today. It is our
    [The United States] responsibility to show true democratic leadership
    and recognize genocide for what it is the annihilation of a people:
    their identity, cultures, language; and talk about it truthfully. In
    addition, we must hold each nation equally accountable for their sins
    and crimes against Human Rights.

    Turkey's constitution on paper sounds democratic, but its government
    and military follow a different set of rules and laws, bending
    the Constitution to support its atrocities towards the Kurds. When
    minorities, like the Kurds, are not allowed Basic Human Rights, which
    are guaranteed by the Constitution, how can Turkey be considered
    a democratic country, which is a member of the United Nations. The
    physical, cultural, and linguistic genocide of the Kurds in Turkey
    must be stopped!

    Bibliography

    About the Kurds. 4 October 2006. Retrived from <
    http://selenasol.com/selena/struggle/kurds.ht ml >

    "Articles of the International Press on Human Rights Violations
    in Turkey".

    2006.

    < http://phlebas.rockefeller.edu/~giannak/turkey.htm l >

    Barkey, H and Fuller, G. Turkey's Kurdish Question. Rowman &
    Littlefield Publishers, Inc.: 1998.

    Fernandes, Desmond & Sarafian, Ara. "Kurdish and Armenian Genocides
    Focus of London Seminar." Armenian Forum. (1999). Page 1-5.

    < http://www.gomidas.org/forum/af4kurds.htm >

    Gunter, Michael M. The Kurds and the Future of Turkey. St. Martin's
    Press: 1997.

    Hr-Net Hellenic Resources Network. Copyright 1995-2006.

    < http://www.hri.org/docs/turkey/ >

    Kurdistan's Homepage. 1999. The Kurdish Question - Its History
    and Present Situation. 13 October 2006. Retrieved from <
    http://members.aol.com/Kurdis6065/index.html >

    Rugman, Jonathan. Ataturk's Children: Turkey and the Kurds. Cassell,
    London: 1996.

    Shekhani, H. 2001-2007. "Welcome to Hemin Shekhani's Website."

    History of Kurdistan. Retrieved 16 October 2006.

    < http://www.hemin.i8.com/index.html >

    United Nations. About the United Nations. Human Rights. More
    Information.

    10 October 2006. < http://www.un.org/rights/morerights.htm >

    United Nations. About the United Nations. History of the UN Charter.

    History of the Charter. 10 October 2006 <
    http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/history/ >

    United Nations. About the United Nations. UN History. History of the
    United Nations.

    10 October 2006. < http://www.un.org/aboutun/unhistory/ >

    United Nations. Human Rights. Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    10 October 2006.

    < http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html >

    WashingtonPost.com. 1999. Who are the Kurds? The
    Washington Post on the web. Retrived from <
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/da ily/feb99/kurdprofile.htm
    >

    Zana, Leyla. "A Test for Turkey: Liberty or Oppression for Kurds
    in Parliament?" International Herald Tribune. (7 December 1994). <
    http://www.hr-action.org/khr/IHT120794.htm >
Working...
X