Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ilham Aliev's Policy Concerning The Question Of Armenia Is Fully In

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ilham Aliev's Policy Concerning The Question Of Armenia Is Fully In

    ILHAM ALIEV'S POLICY CONCERNING THE QUESTION OF ARMENIA IS FULLY IN DEADLOCK

    PanARMENIAN.Net
    03.11.2006 GMT+04:00

    Matthew Braisa: "The President of Azerbaijan can say whatever he wants;
    we are not going to comment on any of his statements"

    The only obstacle for the continuation of the negotiations and for the
    achievement of the success in the settlement is the absence of trust
    between the nations. Absolutely everybody speaks about it, including
    EU, OSCE, and the co-chairmen countries of MG OSCE in the adjustment
    of the Nagorno-Karabagh conflict. And exactly in that question the
    whole world is powerless. The reason is not the unwillingness of
    the Armenian side to carry on a normal dialogue as it is the way of
    putting up the things in Azerbaijan but in the idea carried on by
    Ilham Aliev about the total isolation of Armenia.

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Sometimes it even seems that the president of
    Azerbaijan has lost his sense of reality and proportion and he thinks
    that if Azerbaijan still lives in the feudal Middle Ages then the rest
    of the world has the same idea as he has -to annihilate the Armenia
    that dares to stand on the way of the "Great Azerbaijan". We can
    only guess what the reactions of the political figures and world-wide
    mass media towards these statements are, since the Azerbaijan press
    comes breathless with delight from their president's openness at
    the time when the other countries keep absolute silence. We can
    suppose that this silence is not a mark of consent but just an
    unwillingness to comment on this absurdity. Matthew Braisa from the
    USA in the framework of MG OSCE reacted best of all to junior Aliev:
    "The president of Azerbaijan can say whatever he wants; we are not
    going to comment on his statements".

    Ilham Aliev will fail to drive Armenia at a deadlock and to become
    "the second national leader' by the example of his father for a
    variety of reasons. The main cause that he, being just the image of
    his father, makes statements that match only for a tribal princeling
    with excessively developed ambitions. By the way, Haydar Aliev will
    never let himself to make such statements. He treated the question
    more seriously; the unfounded statements were not enough for him,
    but he paid the mass media for reports in the favor of Azerbaijan. It
    was the way during the war of Karabagh. And later in Moscow and not
    only there the matter was quickly taken under control and they began
    writing and showing what was really going on. Making the impact of
    the Armenian lobby greater, roughlyspeaking Azerbaijan doubts the
    common sense of the whole world.

    The fact that Ilham Aliev's policy in the matter of Armenia is driven
    at a deadlock is clearly known in Baku. They also know that not the
    Azerbaijanis can become impatient, as by the highest standards nothing
    matters to them but the world community can lose the patience. Ilham
    Aliev's hopes concerning the political dividends from the oil-pipe line
    can not become the very truncheon with the help of which the Armenians
    of Karabagh can be "pacified". To put it mildly, these dividends are
    more like soap bubbles, as judging by the words of American expert
    Richarg Giragosyan, the value of the oil-pipe line Baku-Tbilisi-Ghehyan
    turns to be in the direct dependence on Kazakhstan. That is to say
    if tomorrow Nursultan Nazarbaev decides that there is no point to
    support Azerbaijan than he will just turn off the tap. And it will
    mean the end of Aliev's flow of the oil dollars. And if we add onto
    all this the steady slump in oil prices then Azerbaijan will appear
    in difficult straits. The oil in Caspian Sea makes 3% of the world
    wide explored reserves; in the Middle East it makes 63%. It is a
    simple arithmetic-Azerbaijan can not be seriously perceived by the
    USA and Europe as one of the leading suppliers of hydrocarbons. And
    it means that the political influence of that country is in the direct
    dependence on that very 3%.

    "PanARMENIAN.Net" analytical department
Working...
X