Tweet
FIRST DEBATES ON CONSTITUTION INVOLVING POLITICAL FORCES
Srbuhi Vanian
Azat Artsakh, Republic of Nagorno Karabakh
Oct 3 2006
On September 28 the National Assembly kicked off debates on the draft
Constitution of NKR. The first debates involved the representatives
of political forces and parliament factions. It should be noted that
this is going to be the first Constitution of our republic, and this
fact was appreciated by everyone present (independent from their
opinion about the draft). The debates were conducted by the chair
of the Defense, Security and Legality Committee Rudolf Martirosian,
the chair of the State and Legal Committee Yuri Hairapetian, and
the head of the Task Force on Constitution Armen Zalinian. Speaker
Ashot Ghulian was present too. The text of the draft Constitution was
presented to the members of parliament, organizations and political
parties several months ago, and they had time to study the draft and
come up with proposals and questions during the debates. The members
of parliament long discussed the draft and did not reach agreement
on the way of organizing the debates. Member of Parliament Maxim
Mirzoyan said it would be expedient to discuss every chapter of the
draft separately because it is the basic document of the country and
is intended for a long period. "There should be consistency in every
action. Especially in this case. We should not be afraid of not being
recognized. Let us shake off all the complexes and discuss it part by
part considering the regional, political and military peculiarities,"
he said. Everyone appeared to approve the proposal, but Ashot Ghulian
said the shortage of time may not allow this. "The debates, in fact,
must underlie the adoption of the Constitution, but we are obliged
to take into account the time. It does not depend on our desire
and wish," said the speaker of the National Assembly. It became
known that the first reading of the draft will be in early October,
and it may be adopted at the end of the same month. In the middle
of the debates two or three people left the hall demonstratively,
and the remaining participants presented their proposals and
evaluations. The ARF Dashnaktsutyun put forward a number of questions
connected with the activities of the local governments (they say the
governors should be elected), human rights and civil rights. It was
mentioned that our system of government is saturated and certain posts
could be eliminated. Besides, it was emphasized that the parliament
majority should name the prime minister. Besides, an individual at a
government office should be a citizen of NKR. "This must be set down
in the Constitution to empower the parliament to give a vote of no
confidence to one minister or another," said V. Balayan. A. Zalinian
said for the citizenship of a high-ranking government official that
thus the deep love and care of Armenians living outside the country
is doubted. Meanwhile, the adoption of the Constitution will provide
a quite new model of forming executive power to our state, where
the role of the National Assembly will be enhanced. A. Zalinian
elucidated the questions about territorial integrity and borders
put forward by A. Mosiyan. Edward Aghabekian, ARF Dashnaktsutyun -
Movement 88 Alliance wondered if the Constitution enables people to
elect their government and participate in the activities of these
authorities. Member of the Alliance A. Sargissian pointed out the
shortage of time as the greatest drawback in adopting the Constitution,
and proposed holding debates involving the political parties, which
are not represented in the parliament. "The Constitution must first
of all be written for us, for our life, not for displaying it to
the world. In my opinion, it should solve national and territorial
problems, sustain democracy, marking its viable forms for our country,
and decentralize policies," he said.
Although there was disappointment (several members of parliament
left the hall), during the first debates Armen Zalinian called for
more responsible and balanced approach to the continuing debates on
the constitution. "The Constitution must be the product of efforts
by everyone of us, because it is our present and future," he said.
Srbuhi Vanian
Azat Artsakh, Republic of Nagorno Karabakh
Oct 3 2006
On September 28 the National Assembly kicked off debates on the draft
Constitution of NKR. The first debates involved the representatives
of political forces and parliament factions. It should be noted that
this is going to be the first Constitution of our republic, and this
fact was appreciated by everyone present (independent from their
opinion about the draft). The debates were conducted by the chair
of the Defense, Security and Legality Committee Rudolf Martirosian,
the chair of the State and Legal Committee Yuri Hairapetian, and
the head of the Task Force on Constitution Armen Zalinian. Speaker
Ashot Ghulian was present too. The text of the draft Constitution was
presented to the members of parliament, organizations and political
parties several months ago, and they had time to study the draft and
come up with proposals and questions during the debates. The members
of parliament long discussed the draft and did not reach agreement
on the way of organizing the debates. Member of Parliament Maxim
Mirzoyan said it would be expedient to discuss every chapter of the
draft separately because it is the basic document of the country and
is intended for a long period. "There should be consistency in every
action. Especially in this case. We should not be afraid of not being
recognized. Let us shake off all the complexes and discuss it part by
part considering the regional, political and military peculiarities,"
he said. Everyone appeared to approve the proposal, but Ashot Ghulian
said the shortage of time may not allow this. "The debates, in fact,
must underlie the adoption of the Constitution, but we are obliged
to take into account the time. It does not depend on our desire
and wish," said the speaker of the National Assembly. It became
known that the first reading of the draft will be in early October,
and it may be adopted at the end of the same month. In the middle
of the debates two or three people left the hall demonstratively,
and the remaining participants presented their proposals and
evaluations. The ARF Dashnaktsutyun put forward a number of questions
connected with the activities of the local governments (they say the
governors should be elected), human rights and civil rights. It was
mentioned that our system of government is saturated and certain posts
could be eliminated. Besides, it was emphasized that the parliament
majority should name the prime minister. Besides, an individual at a
government office should be a citizen of NKR. "This must be set down
in the Constitution to empower the parliament to give a vote of no
confidence to one minister or another," said V. Balayan. A. Zalinian
said for the citizenship of a high-ranking government official that
thus the deep love and care of Armenians living outside the country
is doubted. Meanwhile, the adoption of the Constitution will provide
a quite new model of forming executive power to our state, where
the role of the National Assembly will be enhanced. A. Zalinian
elucidated the questions about territorial integrity and borders
put forward by A. Mosiyan. Edward Aghabekian, ARF Dashnaktsutyun -
Movement 88 Alliance wondered if the Constitution enables people to
elect their government and participate in the activities of these
authorities. Member of the Alliance A. Sargissian pointed out the
shortage of time as the greatest drawback in adopting the Constitution,
and proposed holding debates involving the political parties, which
are not represented in the parliament. "The Constitution must first
of all be written for us, for our life, not for displaying it to
the world. In my opinion, it should solve national and territorial
problems, sustain democracy, marking its viable forms for our country,
and decentralize policies," he said.
Although there was disappointment (several members of parliament
left the hall), during the first debates Armen Zalinian called for
more responsible and balanced approach to the continuing debates on
the constitution. "The Constitution must be the product of efforts
by everyone of us, because it is our present and future," he said.