Tweet
EXTREMISTS MANAGE TO KEEP EACH OTHER HAPPY
By Gwynne Dyer
Hamilton Spectator, Canada
Oct 18 2006
Words matter. The Holocaust of the Jews in the Second World War
was genocide. The mass deportation of Chechens from their Caucasian
homeland in the same war was a crime but not genocide, though half of
them died, because Moscow's aim was to keep them from collaborating
with German troops, not to exterminate them. Which brings us to the
Armenians and the Turks.
On Oct. 12, France passed a law declaring that anyone who denies that
the mass murder of Armenians in Turkey in 1915-17 was genocide will
face a year in prison. But the French foreign ministry called the law
"unnecessary and untimely" and President Jacques Chirac called Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyib Erdogan to apologize.
Why would the conservative majority in the French parliament
deliberately set out to annoy the Turks, knowing the law will
eventually be vetoed by the president? Because they hope to provoke
a nationalist backlash in Turkey that will further damage its already
difficult relationship with the European Union.
French public opinion is already in a xenophobic mood over the last
expansion of the EU, with folk tales of "Polish plumbers" working for
peanuts and stealing the jobs of honest French workers causing outrage,
especially among right-wing voters who never much liked foreigners
anyway. The prospect of 80 million Muslim Turks joining the EU, even
if it is at least 10 years away, is enough to make their blood boil.
So a row with Turkey should attract votes to the right's presidential
candidate in next May's election. That's likely to be none other
than current Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy who said last month that
Turkey should never be allowed to join the EU: "We have to say who
is European and who isn't. It's no longer possible to leave this
question open." The new law is not really about Armenians or Turks.
It's about the French election.
Meanwhile, in Turkey, anti-EU nationalists have their own game. As
Turkey was busy amending its penal code to conform to EU standards in
the past few years, hard line lawyers and bureaucrats smuggled in a
new law, Article 301, that provides severe penalties for "insulting
Turkishness."
In practice, that mainly means trying to ban public discussion of the
Armenian massacres. Some 70 prosecutions have already been brought
by the ultra-right-wing Union of Lawyers against Turkish authors,
journalists and other public figures.
For several generations Turkey flatly denied any guilt for the Armenian
massacres, insisting they didn't happen and if they did, it was the
Armenians' own fault for rebelling against Turkey in wartime.
Latterly, Turkish intellectuals have been saying that a million or
more Armenians did die in the mass deportations and that Turkey needs
to admit its guilt and apologize, though most still refuse to call
it genocide as that would put it in the same category as the Holocaust.
The prosecutions for "insulting Turkishness" -- even against Turkey's
greatest living novelist, Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk -- are
not just attempts to stifle this dialogue among Turks, or between
Turks and Armenians. The ultra-nationalists also want to derail the
negotiations for EU membership by painting Turkey as an authoritarian
and intolerant state that does not belong in Europe. They are, in
effect, Sarkozy's objective allies.
But Prime Minister Erdogan will probably repeal Article 301 once next
year's elections are past. France's law, which requires people not to
deny the Armenian massacres, the talks that 301 bans, will probably be
vetoed by Chirac. And Turkey's best-known Armenian journalist, Hrant
Dink, who has already been prosecuted several times under 301, has
just announced he'll go to France "to protest against this madness and
violate the law ... and I will commit the crime to be prosecuted there,
so that these two irrational mentalities can race to put me into jail."
Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles
are published in 45 countries.
http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASAp p/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton/Layout/Articl e_Type1&c=Article&cid=1161121814335&ca ll_pageid=1020420665036&col=1112188062581
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
By Gwynne Dyer
Hamilton Spectator, Canada
Oct 18 2006
Words matter. The Holocaust of the Jews in the Second World War
was genocide. The mass deportation of Chechens from their Caucasian
homeland in the same war was a crime but not genocide, though half of
them died, because Moscow's aim was to keep them from collaborating
with German troops, not to exterminate them. Which brings us to the
Armenians and the Turks.
On Oct. 12, France passed a law declaring that anyone who denies that
the mass murder of Armenians in Turkey in 1915-17 was genocide will
face a year in prison. But the French foreign ministry called the law
"unnecessary and untimely" and President Jacques Chirac called Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyib Erdogan to apologize.
Why would the conservative majority in the French parliament
deliberately set out to annoy the Turks, knowing the law will
eventually be vetoed by the president? Because they hope to provoke
a nationalist backlash in Turkey that will further damage its already
difficult relationship with the European Union.
French public opinion is already in a xenophobic mood over the last
expansion of the EU, with folk tales of "Polish plumbers" working for
peanuts and stealing the jobs of honest French workers causing outrage,
especially among right-wing voters who never much liked foreigners
anyway. The prospect of 80 million Muslim Turks joining the EU, even
if it is at least 10 years away, is enough to make their blood boil.
So a row with Turkey should attract votes to the right's presidential
candidate in next May's election. That's likely to be none other
than current Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy who said last month that
Turkey should never be allowed to join the EU: "We have to say who
is European and who isn't. It's no longer possible to leave this
question open." The new law is not really about Armenians or Turks.
It's about the French election.
Meanwhile, in Turkey, anti-EU nationalists have their own game. As
Turkey was busy amending its penal code to conform to EU standards in
the past few years, hard line lawyers and bureaucrats smuggled in a
new law, Article 301, that provides severe penalties for "insulting
Turkishness."
In practice, that mainly means trying to ban public discussion of the
Armenian massacres. Some 70 prosecutions have already been brought
by the ultra-right-wing Union of Lawyers against Turkish authors,
journalists and other public figures.
For several generations Turkey flatly denied any guilt for the Armenian
massacres, insisting they didn't happen and if they did, it was the
Armenians' own fault for rebelling against Turkey in wartime.
Latterly, Turkish intellectuals have been saying that a million or
more Armenians did die in the mass deportations and that Turkey needs
to admit its guilt and apologize, though most still refuse to call
it genocide as that would put it in the same category as the Holocaust.
The prosecutions for "insulting Turkishness" -- even against Turkey's
greatest living novelist, Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk -- are
not just attempts to stifle this dialogue among Turks, or between
Turks and Armenians. The ultra-nationalists also want to derail the
negotiations for EU membership by painting Turkey as an authoritarian
and intolerant state that does not belong in Europe. They are, in
effect, Sarkozy's objective allies.
But Prime Minister Erdogan will probably repeal Article 301 once next
year's elections are past. France's law, which requires people not to
deny the Armenian massacres, the talks that 301 bans, will probably be
vetoed by Chirac. And Turkey's best-known Armenian journalist, Hrant
Dink, who has already been prosecuted several times under 301, has
just announced he'll go to France "to protest against this madness and
violate the law ... and I will commit the crime to be prosecuted there,
so that these two irrational mentalities can race to put me into jail."
Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles
are published in 45 countries.
http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASAp p/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton/Layout/Articl e_Type1&c=Article&cid=1161121814335&ca ll_pageid=1020420665036&col=1112188062581
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress